crfcom
About
- Username
- crfcom
- Joined
- Visits
- 12
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 26
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 20
Reactions
-
Retaliatory Chinese iPhone ban could cause 'demand destruction,' hammer Apple's earnings
GeorgeBMac said:
Trump is in a very strong position in this situation and he knows it. The Chinese and Huawei have already taken some major hits in the first round of this thing, and their trash talk isn't working.This is a simple re-negotiation of a bad trade agreement that the Chinese are blowing out of proportion by personalizing it. Your warning that China may start a war over this is silly. First, they can't afford a war. Second, their economy is already under considerable strain which the escalation of this situation only makes worse. They will continue to sell their rare earth metals because they have to, in order to try and keep their cash flow from going upside down. Apple has more than sufficient means to move all their production jobs out of China to other Asia countries and are already moving their business model away from dependence on sales by pumping up their services. There is no way for China to do any significant damage to Apple. However, they are making a very pedestrian president look like a hero. They are losing big all the way around, and these attempts to make them look dangerous are comical. The mainstream of their population are desperately poor, and they need jobs. China needs to stop the posturing, speak and negotiate responsibly, and take care of their peep's. -
Apple could take a 29% earnings bite if China threatened retaliatory ban
Part of the Chinese frustration is they realize the US has much less to lose and much more to gain from this situation than they do. Any electronics production jobs that are moved to India will be permanent losses for the Chinese and the sales losses for Huawei will also be permanent. China needs to settle up on the best terms they can, and then focus on their own internal problems, which are considerable. -
Samsung to spend $116B in next decade to overtake chipmakers TSMC, Intel, Qualcomm
seanismorris said:cornchip said:Investing in core competency I see.. Making awesome mobile electronics is hard. Especially when you don't have any good software.
Phones are a commodity business, and Samsung is poor at software (which would allow them to differentiate). This just makes sense... -
AT&T says the Galaxy Fold will ship on June 13, Samsung still has no date set
-
Samsung to spend $116B in next decade to overtake chipmakers TSMC, Intel, Qualcomm