canucklehead

Weird for Appleinsider to do focus on the idea that it’s overpriced. Yes, it’s expensive. It may even be slightly overpriced. But considering what it does, the tech behind it, the ultra high resolution display, and the quality of the materials, I’d argue it’s priced almost appropriately.

But to draw a conclusion that the contestants guesses - contestants who clearly know nothing about the device and the tech behind it - proves it’s overpriced, is ridiculous.

Does Appleinsider understand what the term rumour means?

“Why does Apple think anyone wants it?“

IT’S A RUMOUR! “Why does Appleinsider write this piece as if this is actually happening?“

Not to mention, Apple explores a lot of options just because it may be desired. Appleinsider writes about this ALL THE TIME!”

This is what extreme privilege looks like. “You’re not giving me enough of the free thing so I’m going to sue you for more free thing.”

It becomes normalized to have something amazing so when things aren’t absolutely amazing, people think they're being cheated.

People need to grow up and get over themselves.

Jodie Comer, not Cromer

rickzelinsky@mac.com said:

Leather is cruelty and death. 

As long as humans continue to consume cows/animals (which is likely never going to stop), I see no problem with the use of leather. It's a way to make use of an entire animal, rather than just the meat. I think we need to ban the raising of animals just for leather and to continue pursuing environmentally sound methods of tanning, which are already available. Many tanning methods currently employed create a leather product that is no longer biodegradable, which for obvious reasons, will have a negative environmental impact (not to mention, the chemicals used). However, veg tanned leather is still biodegradable and is the traditional method for tanning. There is no reason why cases can't be made with veg tanned leather.