kurai_kage
About
- Username
- kurai_kage
- Joined
- Visits
- 50
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 344
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 121
Reactions
-
Apple isn't done with concessions in iOS to placate the European Union
-
Apple Silicon M3 Pro competes with Nvidia RTX 4090 GPU in AI benchmark [u]
-
We demand our Right to Repair, iFixit tells FTC
InspiredCode said:Right to repair should definitely be applied to the battery since that will likely need replacement every 3 years. This is the closest thing to the origins of right to repair in the tractor and automobile industry. In my opinion, right to repair should relate to wear and preventive maintenance, not damage.The rest of it should really be best effort since all other repairs would relate to accidental damage. It would be good for Apple to make repairability one of their core principles since it relates to environmental impact and total cost of ownership. Both areas where Apple deserves negative press if they fail to do a good job. However, that should be minimally regulated if at all. -
Apple Pay antitrust lawsuit accuses Apple of coercing consumers, excessive fees
rob53 said:avon b7 said:
Given how these credit card networks have been treated since their inception, it is no surprise that Apple is getting a similar treatment because it is sitting between consumers and their banks, and charging a nominal fee. It also means we aren't going to hear an end to Apple Pay lawsuits any time soon.Visa and MasterCard have been embroiled in antitrust litigation repeatedly since the early 1970s—and there is no sign of this litigation abating any time soon. In fact, antitrust litigation now afflicts these networks nearly continuously.1 Yet the Visa and MasterCard networks continue to be able to exercise market power in large part because prior cases have failed to focus on the leading cause of Visa’s and MasterCard’s market power, i.e., the ability of banks to act collectively to fix interchange fees they collect from retail merchants throughout the United States.
-
Old Macs can still get macOS Sonoma with a tool available in October
Ilovelinux said:I have used MacOS OpenCore with great success. It has worked fine on 2009 to 2015 Macbooks. I've installed Big Sur to Ventura. I will admit Linux distros seem towork better but the patcher has been fantastic. The problem with using older MacOS versions is that newer software doesn't always work. I'm not saying that you will get the same level of performance with a patched system that you'd get with one that natively supports the new OS but its a godsend on older machines.However try it for yourself. Its FREE. If you don't like it you can always go back to the old version of MacOS. Just create a bootable USB of the OS you had. Apple is in the business of selling new computers. A machine with 8gb of ram and an SSD can run for many years. The M1 and M2 systems are fantastic and if you use programs likeFinal Cut Pro or Photo Shop and need premium performance than buy it. Used units can be found around $500. However if you have an older system around that you aren't using or can find a good used deal, go for it or listen to people who may work for Apple who try and dissuade you.
I wouldn't go so far as to tell the average user to try it for yourself. New OSes are not guaranteed to support hardware that has been deprecated. Not only could older drivers be removed, but there is firmware to consider which could cause all manner of funky issues as well a potentially impact trying to roll back your OS.
This is about being responsible with experimental installations, weighing the risks, and making a responsible choice.