Rogue01

About

Banned
Username
Rogue01
Joined
Visits
55
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
985
Badges
1
Posts
309
  • MacBook Pro 16-inch M3 Max review: Battery-powered Mac Pro power

    Great review on the M3 Max version of the MacBook Pro.  Apple's tax on RAM and SSD is extortion, especially since they know it cannot be upgraded later.  But a smokin' fast MacBook.
    williamlondonOferkillroy
  • Apple confirms that there is no Apple Silicon 27-inch iMac in the works


    mike1 said:
    timmillea said:
    Next on the culling list is the Mac Studio. When a 14" MacBook Pro can outshine a Mac Pro in reported benchmarks, then the entire M3 SoC family can be fitted to a Mac Mini. There is simply no need for the Studio. 


    Wow. That is a ridiculous conclusion. Everyone should stop developing new computers and chips now. timmillea has decreed that computers can no longer get faster/smaller/more efficient or better in any way. Do you seriously not believe that the Studio, Pro with M4 and M5 or whatever is coming won't have better benchmarks than the current M3?!
    Actually it is not so ridiculous considering the M3 Pro is only 6% faster than the M2 Pro, and intentionally hobbled by Apple to upsell their other computers.  The M3 Max has the huge increase in performance, but the M3 Pro was hobbled with two less performance cores, one less GPU core, and 25% slower memory bandwidth than the M2 Pro.  Why would Apple do this when they claim Apple Silicon is so great?  So a MacBook Pro with M3 Max will be faster than a Mac Studio with M2 Pro and M3 Pro.  So the 3nm process for the M3 Pro did absolutely nothing for the chip.  If Apple maintained the 8 core performance and 4 core efficiency with the same GPU core and same memory bandwidth, the M3 Pro would be a much better chip.  So don't assume the M4 or later would be surprisingly better when everyone thought the M3 was going to be this huge performance boost.  Only true if you look at the M3 and M3 Max.  M3 Pro is a waste.
    gatorguydarkvaderwilliamlondonwatto_cobra
  • Apple confirms that there is no Apple Silicon 27-inch iMac in the works

    It’s going to be 27.5” and it is coming out 15 days after you buy your 24”.
    I was thinking 27.1" and Apple will claim it is the 'All New iMac' and so revolutionary.
    darkvaderwatto_cobra
  • M3 24-inch iMac vs M1 24-inch iMac -- Specs, price, and features, compared

    I would hardly call the 24" iMac 'well received' with consumers.  Within a few months of release, the Apple refurb store was full of them due to customer returns.  It was a downgrade from the 27" that supported 128GB of RAM, more ports, high-end GPU, higher SSD storage, and a 5K larger display.  Sad that the only upgrade is an M3, without even offering the M3 Pro or M3 Max.  I would never buy an iMac again with these specs.  Too limiting.
    Alex1Nmuthuk_vanalingamwilliamlondonnubusmarklarkbaconstang
  • Apple gifts influencers AirPods Max before Monday's 'Spatial' event

    It would be interesting if they were a new version of the AP Max , and the fact will be made public during the presentation.
    That would never happen.  Apple would never give out a new product before they even announce it.
    byronlronn