Madbum

Sweeney also doesn’t have to sell in App Store. He can go sell door to door himself  for 0 percent commission or hire some kids to do it for him for a negotiated wage. Or he can just sell it in his website and pay just web hosting, I am sure Apple would be ok with that as well 

Epic and Sweeney is owned by Chinese communists.

This is no different than Putin going after Apple

let that sink in 

mangakatten said:

Isn’t it more like Railroad companies blocking competitors from driving their own trains and selling tickets on the Railroad companies tracks? That being said I kinda wish Epic would give up, I wanna play Fortnite again. 

Well if the railroads were built and owned privately by railroad company A, why would they need to let rail company B use it for free or dictate any rules?

Xed said:

Madbum said:

jblongz said:

II don't agree with the way Epic Games started this, but I do feel their sentiment.  Taking 30% of someone's business in order to sell on their platform is like doing the same in order to make a MacOS or Windows 11 app.  It does seem unfair.

Sweeney and his company is owned by the Chinese communists.

The Chinese communists argument has been stated 3x already and two of them were by you. We get it.

Don’t you think this is a big deal. I mean people were all over Apple for Foxconn and Foxconn isn’t even owned by Chinese communists! Epic games is!

hmlongco said:

How am I supposed to be able to get 90% of the profits if Apple insists on getting 30%?

Is apple
forcing him to sell on the App Store with a gun? Sweeney can sell on the web, his own store, but he wants to use Apples store at his price.

any of you try walking into home depot
and try to sell your stuff there lately? You tell them the rules and see what haplens