mobius

I can't help but notice the name looks like someone shrugging their shoulders...

Hopefully that's not the stock response to most of your questions!

Makes sense. But I think they also need to address the confusing naming schemes across all of their product lines.

What we have now is starting to echo the confusion that met consumers before Steve Jobs returned in 1997:

Macbook, Macbook Air, Macbook Pro

iMac 21.5" Retina 4k, iMac 27" Retina 5k, Mac Pro, Mac Mini

iPad mini 2, iPad mini 4, iPad Air 2, iPad Pro 9.7", iPad Pro 12.9"

iPhone SE, iPhone 6, iPhone 6 Plus, iPhone 6s, iPhone 6s Plus

iPod Touch, iPod Nano, iPod Shuffle

Apple TV, The New Apple TV

Apple Watch, Apple Watch Sport, Apple Watch Edition

I think the main problem is the iPad and iPhone naming schemes which is confusing for new customers. But the fact that there seems to be no naming convention between product categories makes navigating the various options less than simple - ironic for a company traditionally thought of as consumer friendly.

I am in support of Apple. But in the interests of fairness, impartiality, and balanced journalism I would like to know how many (if any) significant figures, groups, organisations or companies have filed amicus briefs in support of the FBI.

SpamSandwich said:

Please, Tim. Perform a corporate inversion, relocate to Ireland and compete in the US with all of the unreasonable advantages foreign competitors have. Apple is not welcome here anymore.

When the Apple Spaceship is finished perhaps we'll see it take off and relocate to the moon where they'll be free of interfering backwards laws.

iPhone
Designed by Apple in Space
Assembled on Earth

prox said:

ibill said:

Do you have a source for that claim, or are you just making stuff up?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3456654/Apple-refusing-unlock-San-Bernardino-terrorist-s-phone-ask-did-seemingly-let-China-secret-data-security-checks-year.html I think if you do a Google Search plenty more articles can be found.

If you want to be taken seriously, and I assume that you do, never use the Daily Mail as evidence to support your assertions. They are a disgusting newspaper and value sensationalism above truth.