- Last Active
SpamSandwich said:ericthehalfbee said:What about the Mac Pro? Seems like an ideal time to announce it.
Two videos, one encoded normally at 555 kilobits per second (kbps) and another using Dynamic Optimizer at half the bitrate, are said to look identical, while another comparison showed the Dynamic Optimizer-encoded version of a video looks better at 100kbps than the existing technique at the same bitrate.Soli said:Is that image in the article from Netflix or chosen by the AI staff, because the image on the left isn't even close to the quality on the right, and not even close to any realitive designation of identical? Did I miss where it was referenced in the article?
This incident reminded me of the riveting story of Airfrance 447. Cars will be better drivers sometime soon, but until then, there are going to be accidents; this won't be the last time the driver is at fault for failing take over for an "autopilot".
nubus said:mknelson said:Remember 1998 when the first iMac came out? There weren't a lot of USB devices so you had to buy USB to ADC and USB to serial adapters.
It removed the extra cost of accessories for Mac and gave us access to more devices.
This is different. What exactly do we gain by not having MagSafe and mini DisplayPort? Now all our dongles and power adapters are of no value.
"Currently, no USB devices exist for the Mac."
While USB was on many PCs prior to the iMac, I remember that virtually all of them still shipped with PS2 keyboards and mice. USB, a standard in 1998? Well, it was a "standard" from the day it was released, but it was not the de facto standard in 1998 that you seem to be claiming it was.
For an accurate account of how forward looking USB was on the first iMac, read this post on Stephen Hackett's blog, 512 pixels. He's a noted Mac history buff, and also provides 1998 quotes about the state of USB on the PC (see the "waffling" quote).
The state of USB-C today is ahead of where USB was when the original iMac was announced in 1998.