pascal007

It’s bluff on Apple’s part. Apple Intelligence wasn’t going to be available anyway because it only works in English for now.

its also bluff because Microsoft’s solution is available and working in multiple languages and countries, and so is Google’s (and ChatGPT, as well as others).

So Apple is agitating the American flag to hide the limitations of their current AI implementation. 

22july2013 said:

Apple could trademark the term "Apple Intelligence" to try to get people to think of Apple when they think of "AI".

I’m sure they thought about it, but went against it as it would be a constant source of derision if Apple’s AI implementation ended up  as good as their current Siri. 

I’m not a Meta fan, in no way shape or form. But I have a hard time finding a tear for Apple’s dramatic stance. If Apple thinks that managing fees has a cost, then they should simply stop requiring that developers use their transactional platform. Less use, less transactions, less costs overall. Stop forcing developers to use Apple transactional platform and leave reimbursements to the developers. The current system doesn’t adequately protect customers anyway as abusive developers still manage to charge abusive fees without Apple even batting an eye. 

It seems to me that wifi 6 has barely stabilized (and not everything has stepped up to 6E, let alone 6), and already they’re trying to sell us a new standard? Nope! 

MplsP said:

From Nebraska Furniture Mart????

A little googling leads to this : https://www.nfm.com/ipad-and-tablets