1st
About
- Username
- 1st
- Joined
- Visits
- 48
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 81
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 443
Reactions
-
Apple testing AR-based car navigation and self-driving software with virtual reality rigs - report
josha said:ireland said:My hunch is Apple Car project hasn't stopped and won't. They're working on a car. Vertical company.
The computer technology for self driving is where Apple should be. -
Corporate culture, haste reportedly at core of Samsung mishandling of Note 7 situation
misa said:
My hope here is that some regulations come down the pipe regarding batteries large enough to ignite, that they have a physical "kill switch" or the battery be ejectable to ensure that the user isn't harmed, and they can be safely mailed back. Even then, if the problem is something to do with the battery internals, the battery might still spontaneously combust.
bomb is bad (exploded battery), sling gun (eject able battery) even worse... stop weaponize the commercial product please.
-
More Galaxy Note 7 fires reported as cryptic communications from Samsung complicate exchange proces
lkrupp said:Well, people are still buying Volkswagens so... -
AT&T might halt Samsung Galaxy Note 7 sales due to safety risks, other carriers offer swaps
anyone know what is the problem? none of the theory out there explain why it explode after charge, mostly, just sitting around... not during charge, firm ware update didn't help (charge up to 60%, 3xxx battery basically only used a bit more than half capacity), the phone on the airplane may experience pressure change, but with casing around, it can't deform that much, unless the casing like soft packet (watch your potato chip bag inflated on airplane? don't open it...;-).learn from someone else mistake is priceless treat... anyone care to shin light? thx in advance...it just didn't make any sense with all the stuff they put out there... -
Professor proves NAND mirroring attack thwarts iPhone 5c security protocols
svanthem said:So this 5c stymies the entire FBI who has to pay a hacker a zillion dollars to get it done and this guy does it in 40 hours with a $100 of hardware? Am I missing something here?
The "guy" is super smart computer geek professor from top notch university in UK. FBI may not have access to his brain at any price. As for $100 or so hardware, it depend upon the user/designer, not the hardware... you missing big here. Knowing who is the best in the field is priceless.