eriamjh
About
- Username
- eriamjh
- Joined
- Visits
- 217
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 3,558
- Badges
- 2
- Posts
- 1,847
Reactions
-
iPhone 15 Pro Max periscope camera to be major selling point, says Kuo
-
Developers evangelize Apple Vision Pro labs in latest update
-
Major 'Apple Watch X' redesign rumored to arrive in 2024
If they call it X, I will sh*t. X is stupid, just like that idiot who called his company X. This isn’t 2000.I don’t buy the whole “takes up a lot of space” argument. The current band method is secure an elegant. It’s 1000x better than the stupid spring-pin method used by conventional watches. It’s clean. It works.The band attachment method is external. It does not take up space inside the watch. It does not make the watch significantly larger. It’s a part of the watch. It’s required.Magnetic attachment is weak and lame.A thinner watch would be neat, but the battery life is horrendous already and will only be worse if thinner.Sorry, Gurman, I call shenanigans. -
Apple's forgotten Trailers app is on its way out
-
Windows XP can partially run on Vision Pro hardware in emulation