sdw2001
About
- Username
- sdw2001
- Joined
- Visits
- 283
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 5,035
- Badges
- 2
- Posts
- 18,016
Reactions
-
iPhone 15 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra -- specs, price, & features compared
-
Epic's Tim Sweeney is mad about Apple's EU App Store concessions
-
Netflix says use Safari on Apple Vision Pro, because you aren't getting an app
-
Apple's stripping out blood oxygen sensing from Apple Watch enough to skirt import ban
tech_traveller said:I am glad. Whether you like or dislike Apple, medical devices should have some exception to other product categories.
That being said, I hope Masimo gets reimbursed for their troubles.This whole thing is about money. I know that sounds obvious, but what I mean is Apple controls the entire process. They decided it would be more cost-effective to fight it and make changes on the periphery. They could’ve simply cut a big check to license the technology. Who knows what they want for that. Let’s say they wanted $250 million. That’s a core technology for them and the company has a market cap of a little over 6 billion. Apple likely figured that fighting it in court and making changes would cost less. Let’s say 50 million. Ultimately, Apple will win either way. They’re not simply going to tuck their tail between their legs and not sell the Apple Watch anymore. If push comes to shove, could buy Masimo 30 times over just with its cash-on-hand. -
Tim Cook's pay drops to $63 million for 2023
Appleish said:Unlike most uber CEOs, he probably earned it. That being said, tax the rich like we did back in the good ol' 1950s.