crowley

I don't add "in my opinion" to everything I say because everything I say is my opinion.  I'm not wasting keystrokes on clarifying to pedants what they should already be able to discern.

About

Banned
Username
crowley
Joined
Visits
454
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
11,767
Badges
2
Posts
10,453
  • 2022 MacBook Air will have 'M2' chip, MagSafe, 1080p camera, says leaker

    I never liked the taper of the MBA (or any of the MBA look-alikes). The original MBA with the thin edge all round looked better IMO
    Huh?  MBA has always had a taper.  The original was also wedge shaped.
    thtimergingenious
  • Apple Car battery talks breaking down under weight of Apple's demands

    Smart suppliers.  Get into bed with Apple at your peril.
    darkvader
  • Apple could be the next target of China's push to get more data stored locally

    tylersdad said:
    Which poison pill will Apple swallow? Will they aid the Chinese authoritarian regime and protect their profits from China? Or will they protect their customers from the authoritarian regime? 

    I have a feeling it's the first option that Apple will choose. 
    How about Ford? Samsung? How about Microsoft? Are you recommending that companies ignore local laws? I'm all for a single international government, but something tells me you just want things different ways on different days. A multinational company has no ability to ignore local/national laws. Just as a British company doing business in the US has to follow US Laws.

    I don't have an answer here except that in the future this will be a huge issue. Cars will have nav and communication, as will TV's and glasses and coats. 'Data' and all it has grown to encapsulate will only get to be a bigger part of every companies business. So do US companies just ignore the rest of the world when they hit a national law that goes against, well, what exactly? My idea of 'freedom'? Texas' idea of freedom? It's a much more complicated and nuanced issue I think. US businesses wouldn't do well if we decide to ignore every country that has onerous laws. I think everyone happily sells in Saudi Arabia, not even close to being a bastion of freedom. Again, I don't have the answer but it's silly to put this down to 'profit or capitulation' as I'm not even sure exactly what laws in other countries you don't like.
    I’m not sure why you are equating British, EU, US, or other Western countries’ laws with China. And this has nothing to do with China being a communist country. It is a surveillance state that allows zero political dissent, and the people have no say in how they are governed. Why encourage this? 
    US has highest crime rate in the world, much higher than China. This is the tradeoff. 
    Stop pulling "facts" out of your ass: https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/crime-rate-by-country
    JWSC
  • Apple unveils 16-inch MacBook Pro with M1 Pro, M1 Max starting at $2499

    crowley said:

    I wonder if the charger has a USB-C connector on the block, or if it's an integrated cable.  I hope the former.

    Confirmed, the charge block has a USB-C port on it. So the cable is MagSafe on one end and USB-C on the other. And they're also selling the cable separately.  That's a nice move Apple.
    elijahgcgWerksmelgrosswatto_cobra
  • New MacBook Pro models limited to HDMI 2.0

    seanj said:
    entropys said:
    Yes it should. Hardly anyone has USBc projectors. But they all have hdmi.
    Who on Earth has projectors in this day and age?
    Never use HDMI ports, DP is so superior.
    I've only once gone into a conference room and hooked up a projector via DP (mini-DP actually). Every other time it has been HDMI.  And I do this a lot (admittedly less so in the past 18 months).

    And there are many reason why HDMI is the preferable port to DisplayPort: ubiquity for one, sound for two, and TV compatibility as the cherry.
    GeorgeBMacMplsPmike1elijahgmuthuk_vanalingamspock1234FileMakerFeller