realistic

Sam123 said:

"Improved touch capabilities" Sounds like a marketing ploy to sell more phones or use your pinky. 
Lets face it other then improving battery life there is not much left to improve.

magman1979 said:

Boo hoo cry me a XXXXXXX river, ad agencies complaining Apple is making it more difficult for them to perform their wholesale harvest of user data without our consent.

Apple, keep it up! These XXXXXXX deserve NOTHING for their criminal acts!

Soli said:

lkrupp said:

Soli said:

lkrupp said:

Soli said:

This means the facility will have passed inspection. Is there any evidence that this has occurred yet?

So Apple announced it would take place in the Steve Jobs Theater but they lied to us?

I'm not understanding your point. Are you saying that the inspection for occupancy has already happened, that the info was already stated, and that I'm somehow purposely saying that Apple is lying about the inspection having already taken place?

The 'point' is why do you require proof that Apple has the required permits to hold the event in the Steve Jobs Theater? Apple had announced the event would take place in the theater yet YOU seek evidence that occupancy permits have been issued. Why is it your business to question whether Apple may legally hold the event in their own building when it's pretty obvious they will do so? I suppose you could file a freedom of information claim at Cupertino City Hall demanding to see said inspection permits. Maybe you could get back to us then.

Come again? Where did I require anything from Apple? I simply asked if there was any evidence that the inspection has already occurred—which is a topic that has been brought up often in regards to Apple Park and often publicly posted by cities. Also, it's my business to ask questions here just as much as its your business to ask question here, except that mine are actually relevant to the topic at hand and yours sound like your somehow offended that I'm curious to know the details of the occupancy permit.