frac

About

Username
frac
Joined
Visits
42
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
345
Badges
1
Posts
480
  • Flying car backed by Google co-founder Larry Page takes to skies in early demo

    ike17055 said:
    Wow. The negative comments seem so contrary to the attitudes of most readers to a tech site. Think big. And Try looking up the human passenger drone that is being rolled out in the United Arab Emirates right now. Literally a giant quad copter. Its navigation is all GPS driven. Includes collision avoidance radar, and It can fly on fewer than four rotors if needed for emergency landing. The safety issues are at least as solveable as they are for land vehicles. In time, i see these vehicles being commonplace flying above existing major roadways, as a form of a second level, or upper "deck" assisted by the same electronic sensors that will keep terrestrial autonomous vehicles on course and within their lanes. The drone style vehicle is vertical landing and takeoff adding added practicality for some forms of commuting. Not for everyone, or affordable for everyone, for sure, but an important tool, potentially, in expanding capacity of existing corridors.
    I doubt you have a pilot's licence with such an post. This is not a concept that is going anywhere outside of wishful thinking and certain unregulated 'too rich to care' states where public safety is perfunctory at best. 
    I wouldn't trust a flying bedstead more than 15' off the ground and as for flying above busy roads, you've got to be kidding. Most multi lane  highways exhibit wind tunnelling effects up to around 100', a height where cross winds, downdraughts, shear and turbulence become real problems to even big aircraft, let alone light-as-a-feathery flying frames with no aero surface control. Winds that can move you tens of yards up/down/sideways in the blink of an eye.  There is a reason why air corridors are miles wide and high. Your "easily solvable safety issues' is severely lacking in credibility. 
    Really scary idea.
    watto_cobra
  • Apple's Find my iPhone fingers a phone finagler

    "Apple's Find my iPhone fingers finagler"
    Now that's alliteration to warm my heart. 
    dysamoria
  • Apple's 'iPhone 8' again rumored to adopt stainless steel chassis, flat OLED, vertical iSi...

    "Most recently, a report citing supply chain insiders said "iPhone 8" would source a mildly curved OLED display from Samsung in order to cut down on engineering challenges. <b>Dramatically curved screens like those found in Samsung's Galaxy product line require identically curved glass cover units to accommodate the completed laminated display, a complex task that necessitates extra design and manufacturing steps.</b>"
    Er what? That doesn't sound very Apple_like. 
    doozydozen
  • Rumor: Integrating Touch ID into 'iPhone 8' display remains Apple's 'biggest bottleneck'

    avon b7 said:
    foggyhill said:
    I don't see the reader on the back as user unfriendly at all. If the phone is almost bezel-less then it has a smaller footprint so even someone with smaller hands can reach it. I have a phone exactly the same height as the S8 and my finger naturally rests on the back next to the camera but slightly closer to the edge. Not sure it's as comfy on the S8+ which is bigger
    Its moronic to fracking extreme. You lose an important function for another, if your willing to go for that idiotic tradeof, good for you.
    It's a question of preference. Mine is on the rear, centre placed right below the camera (which I never hit by accident). The scanner is a natural fit for my index fingers. I adore the rear placement and the scanner gestures.

    You will find millions of people who prefer it on the rear. It's not moronic in the slightest.
    Well bully for you, I'm happy for you. I'm also pretty happy to bet the vast majority of iPhone users would view it as a kludge that removes a convenience we have come to rely on. And yes...a moronic move. 
    Another thing. A backside centrally_placed sensor almost demands that you use the index finger, since as you say it's "...a natural fit". That sort of predictable social engineering is easily exploited. And yes, you will find millions of non-iPhone users will be similarly compromised. 
    watto_cobra
  • Apple posts GPU-related job openings in UK following Imagination breakup

    wigby said:
    Apple is ramping up its efforts to create its own GPU designs, following the iPhone producer's decision to stop working with the U.K.-based Imagination Technologies, by advertising a number of job postings within the graphics field in London.




    Appearing on the United Kingdom version of Apple's jobs board over the last month, the company has listed 12 "Hardware Engineering" job postings in London, located within Hanover Street. Spotted by The Telegraph, the listings are for Apple's "UK Design Centre," with 11 out of the 12 openings having some connection to GPU design.

    In the listing for the Engineering Program Manager posted on March 29, the posting mentions a "newly formed graphics design team" that would work on the "definition of the architecture, spec, design, and verification of graphics IP from concept through to silicon." Another posting for a Design Verification Lead involves "RTL verification of blocks in graphics cores, requiring a "deep understanding of the micro-architectural details of designs, and how they work within the broader GPU."

    Other roles advertised in the last month include a Design Verification Engineer, a Graphics Content Engineer, and an Emulation Engineer who needs to have an understanding of "CPU and/or GPU architecture and micro architecture."

    The advertising for new graphics-related roles follow after it was revealed Apple was working on its own graphics technology to use in iOS devices in the future. The project was confirmed as part of a statement from Imagination Technologies, the UK firm that has provided Apple's mobile graphics processing architecture used in iPhones, iPads, and other devices for a number of years.

    Apple has not revealed why it is moving away from its partnership with Imagination in favor of its own designs, but it is likely to be an attempt by Apple to exert more control over the hardware it produces. By designing its own GPU cores, like it does for its A-series processors, Apple could fine tune the technology to what it believes is required, eliminating potential limitations from work created by third-party companies.

    It is unknown exactly when Apple will be bringing out products using its own GPU designs, but according to Imagination's statement, Apple will stop using its intellectual property in its new products within 15 months to two years.

    In the same statement, Imagination advised it believed it would be extremely challenging for Apple to design a brand new GPU architecture from scratch without infringing its intellectual property rights, in what seemed to be a threat of potential legal action. Imagination requested evidence from Apple for its work, but was declined.
    Can anyone explain why new job postings always seem to follow news or rumors? The same thing happened with Apple's security initiatives, car, watch, etc. Shouldn't these job postings appear months or even years before the new product rumor or announcement? Supposedly, Apple's been working on something big in AR for over a year now. Even I know they need some kind of customized GPU for such an endeavor so why are we only seeing job listings now?
    Well you first have to have a good idea of the concept's requirements before targeted hiring sprees. Particularly since Apple is in uncharted waters. 
    watto_cobra