sumergo
About
- Username
- sumergo
- Joined
- Visits
- 114
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 175
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 215
Reactions
-
Apple diverting worker shuttles because of smashed windows
lkrupp said:macxpress said:Why do people have to be stupid and damage someone else's property? Why can't people just leave shit alone that isn't theirs?
It's not "Democrat socialists" (whoever they are) that "constantly barrage" the "class warfare" views you list. "Class jealousy" as you describe it, comes from the bottom-up (think trump) and is propagandized by right wing advocates.
Democrats - for all their liberal, artsy, Hollywood, elite faults - just seem to want everyone to be treated equally and get a break.
Or maybe you were just making a bad joke ;-(
-
Apple Park office chairs cost nearly $1,200 apiece, handpicked by designer Jony Ive
tallest skil said:bloodshotrollin'red said:couldn't you instead ask the Apple Board to pay us Brits a great deal more tax? -
Why Apple opposes the FCC's repeal of net neutrality
wizard69 said:viclauyyc said:Apple has major interest in the issue, Apple Music, AppleTV, FaceTime and iMessage.
But no matter what, it is a great cause to fight.
Same thing apply to Google, YouTube, Facebook or any other steaming service.
Apple talks about quality of service but does little to assure that its services prevent network congestion. That is a problem.
I thought that neutrality meant that all bits are equal. You seem to be saying that there is already some sort of "management", or differential throttling going on whereby if someone (a corporation?) dumps many billion bits on the web (as a stream) they get some sort of priority over my few email bits. Like I say, I thought all internet bits were equal end-to-end and that streaming was handled by software at either end to ensure, say, a coherent movie presentation.
I need enlightenment ;-) -
All 2018 iPhones likely to adopt Face ID biometrics, TrueDepth camera if consumer response...
-
All 2018 iPhones likely to adopt Face ID biometrics, TrueDepth camera if consumer response...
boogerman2000 said:sumergo said:My problem with FaceID is that it further degrades our individual privacy and makes us more vulnerable to both over-officious government and predatory marketing.
TouchID is my physical finger on this phone. FaceID is my face on a potentially global database. Coming from the UK, one of the most surveilled societies in the western world, I find this worrying.
I'm not interested in being reduced to a target for near-field / face-recognition ads or constant surveilance.
An old fart? For sure - I actually like being an individual.
http://www.npr.org/2017/09/13/548662507/world-without-mind-is-an-urgent-personal-polemic
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/chapman/ct-perspec-iphone-x-unabomber-technology-20170913-story.html
We are the wrong species. 250,000 year old, hunter-gatherer brains, grappling with nuclear technology & always-on, instant communications. It must be clear that we don't see to be able to handle this complexity ;-(