- Last Active
applesauce007 said:Amazon echo is over rated. I think it will fade in time.
Amazon people who have never used voice assistance will be impressed for a while with Alexa.
Time will tell.
I've also had an Amazon Echo since it first came out. I was quite lucky with their lottery and got the very first shipment of the Echo. I was impressed then and I still am today. As Ttollerton states, the HW is more extensive, which probably means the far-field microphones can do a better job, but its excellence as a product and service far exceeds that one aspect.
Alexa is amazingly fast. It feels like it's processing its answer before you even finish speaking so it can reply with a cadence that would impress a Gilmore Girl. It also never seems to misunderstand a single thing I say and never seems to have to "think about" what I asked, unlike Siri. With Siri it feels like it it's querying a server for a reply, but with Alexa it all feels localized even though it's not. Same WiFi network and same broadband connection.
All these services have pros and cons—most of which are the same—but Alexa has 3 great features I wish Apple had brought to Siri from the start:
- I can look at any previous Alexa request in my history in the Alexa app on on Amazon.com. I can then let Amazon know how well the service did in understanding my voice (voice-to-text) and/or parsing my query. If Apple had this I believe they could've made Siri much better, much faster.
- I can load Skills into Alexa. These are 3rd-party apps for Alexa. Whatever abilities the Alexa service comes with out of the box, telling Alexa to add a Skill shores up pretty much anything you can think of. I think Apple just opened up Siri to 3rd-party developers with APIs for iOS 10 but I honestly can't recall because of the way Apple seems to treat Siri like the M[achi]n[e] in the Iron Mask.
- I get emails from Amazon letting me know what new features were added to the Alexa service. They list many example commands and major new Skills and I'm often willing to try them because they are usually pretty nifty. I know Apple has added new features to Siri—which oddly seem to come with iOS updates—but I couldn't tell you any of its newer features to enrich my life because of how they market the service.
I'm sure Siri is world's better than it was when it originally came out on the iPhone 4S in 2011, and I'm sure that many of the questions I've asked in the past and got poor to no answer probably work great now, but I don't go to the trouble of writing down all the failed queries, wait a year, and then try them again. This is not uncommon and Siri has spoiled for many Apple customers except for the most basic requests. Apple needs to find a way to reinvigorate Siri.
PS: I'm remodeling my home and when my bedroom is finished I'll be going "electronics free" in the bedroom (mostly) with the intention of it leading to better sleep habits which will hopefully result in more productive waking hours. That means no iPhone or Watch will charge in the room on the nightstand. No entertainment in the bedroom (meaning no Mac, no TV, and no book reading). Not even a traditional alarm clock will be used because of the light from the clock can have a negative effect, according to some studies. Instead I'll have an Amazon Dot ($49) which will allow me to voice activate setting an alarm and asking what time it is as its primary use. I tested this with my Echo, but I'd rather keep that in the kitchen/dining area because of its great speaker and its benefits when cooking.
I predict people will bitch that stores are getting them first and they already spent money on the pre-order.bloggerblog said:Do they work on a Mac as well?
strells said:jorgie said:Yeah because there's no way you could make the device thicker and give it a bigger battery.
The thin and light design requirement is the problem, not the technology. Trust me, I honestly want one of these machines, but I don't care if it weighs an extra pound and is a little bit thicker due to a bigger battery that can power more RAM. I'm sure most pros don't care as well.
sog35 said:mark fearing said:Sort of like the Apple Pencil debacle just last year. Device shown, support grows, interest develops, wallets open and...no show.
I pretty much lost all interest in Airpods
thewhitefalcon said:14nm vs 10nm isn't going to 'save space' in an iPad. Manufacturing process has nothing to do with physical chip size.
The A5 is what Apple using in the original iPad 2. It was a 45nm die. The A5R2, a revision of the iPad 2 after the iPad 3 had launched, moved to a 32nm die. This was likely to test the process in a low yield capacity. As you can see, it significantly shrunk the size of the chip. The area is reduced by a little more than 50% due to the smaller transistors.
robin huber said:I am sure Apple will be blocking this somehow.
rogifan_new said:awilliams87 said:I was praying to the God in Hades that this was a DED article. Now I can sit down and have an enjoyable time reading it.
Let's remember that HomeKit is not an easy certification because Apple wants to make sure that a connected home is reasonably secure.
An unhackable home my never happen, but companies should at least try to be vigilant in their efforts. Here's an example of a massive fail:
nubus said:Selling phones is not going to improve the focus, features, or quality of macOS or the computers we use as our main tool for work.