AppleInsider AppleInsider Forums


Go Back   AppleInsider > Applications
Register Members List New Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-11-2007, 01:56 AM   #1
JupiterOne
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,006
Quote:
Originally Posted by JupiterOne View Post
I rebooted, ran Apple Software Update. There was the iTunes security update. I installed that and my problems went away. Interesting.....
Nevermind. After relaunching, everything is broken again.

Quote:
Originally Posted by melgross View Post
Holy crap (excuse me).....WHAT is going on here?
My thoughts exactly!
JupiterOne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2007, 01:59 AM   #2
mbaynham
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 531
Quote:
Originally Posted by petermac View Post
Remount the Safari3Beta.dmg that you would have downloaded and run the uninstall.pkg. I've done it, & it works fine. My earlier posts today were done with Safari 3 beta, this is being done on safari 2
Cheers
nope, nothing. might try and find an unofficial copy if you know what i mean. i dont think there is anything else for it. i havnt got an external HDD, havnt got an external dvd driver, ipod is basically full. i think im buggered me old son...


"i find that if you keep talkin', your mouth comes up with stuff..." Karl Pilkington
mbaynham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2007, 02:00 AM   #3
aaarrrgggh
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Paradise
Posts: 402
Excuse me for being slow here-- I understand Safari as iPhone SDK model, but I am still missing why anybody would use Safari over Firefox for browsing the web.

The extensions are what make browsing practical today. I might only have a handful of them for my own use, but it makes a huge difference in the browsing environment. Life without adblock, flashblock, and noscript just isn't the same.

The beta is faster than the old Safari for sure, but I have already given up on it after a few minutes...
aaarrrgggh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2007, 02:01 AM   #4
e1618978
will burn in the Fiery Pit of Hell.
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 5,317
tirerack.com still crashes with Safari


45 2a3 300b 211 845 833
e1618978 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2007, 02:08 AM   #5
trevc
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 36
Secret Leopard Features?

Well, I guess the most 'secret' things are the 2 new features desktop/finder which I include Quicklook as part of the finder.

These features took that long to come out? Nice, but not really WOW. I mean, who cares that my window reflects off the dock if I drag it close enough? Something not make the cut?

Safari on Windows, not bad, but really designed to support iPhone Developers more than anything, as I still prefer the plugins/themes, etc., etc. of Firefox.

What I hate is that Apple will probably update Safari for Windows XP longer than it updates it for Panther, etc.
trevc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2007, 02:09 AM   #6
Maffrew
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Leicester, UK
Posts: 139
I've installed the beta on my iMac G5, and it's snappy as hell, but I have one question: Why is it still brushed metal, when all the screenshots everywhere are in the iTunes stylee?

Am I missing an option somewhere to change it?


http://www.tangent21.com
Maffrew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2007, 02:23 AM   #7
melgross
Global Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 19,612
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbaynham View Post
nope. totally gone. the uninstaller doesnt even launch, and theres no sign of safari in the finder. i spotlighted it, nothing
After thinking that 3 was working properly, I went back to 2.0.4, because it wasn't working properly.

I used the uninstaller, and everything is fine.

You did let it Restart, right?
melgross is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2007, 02:49 AM   #8
miquet
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Japan
Posts: 7
When I go to CNN and such like

safari cannot display any video content as they use Windows media Player and safari doesn't support the plug in without me purchasing Flip for Mac.
Is this still true, if so what is the point in offering it to windows users?
Many websites are non safari compatible which pi---es me off too.
miquet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2007, 02:04 PM   #9
melgross
Global Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 19,612
Arrgghh!

I'm disappointed about the whole thing.

And as far as Safari goes, I hope they fixed all of the annoying problems of the current version. I'll try out the new one later, but what bothers me is:

Having to click on a bookmark folder to get it to open, and it having to take time to do so the first time.

Having to click on it again to get it to close when moving the pointer to another folder on the bar, and then having to click on the new one, and so on.

Firefox doesn't require this. It's very annoying.

Having the Bookmarks menu take time to open the first time, sometimes the beachball even comes on!

Having pages render improperly, esp. when using increased type sizes, but even when not doing that.

Having columns on some sites open improperly, that is, not having the proper width, so that horiz scrolling is required. Again, Firefox doesn't have this problem.

Having sites that start with irc, for example refuse to open, because Safari doesn't recognize sites that start with that, and other, initials.

Not being able to customize the pop-up blocker (and it wish it would stop the new pop-ups!!!)

There are other problems as well, but those bother me the most.

When I have some time later, I'll see if any have been fixed in 3.0. If not, it won't be good for Apple on Windows.
melgross is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2007, 02:19 PM   #10
AppleInsider
Kasper's Automated Slave
 
Join Date: Nov 1997
Posts: 6,159
Apple to release Safari browser for Windows

Apple Inc. at its developer conference on Monday announced a plan to release a version of its Safari Web browser for rival Microsoft Corp.'s Windows operating systems.

Referencing industry standard iBench tests that show the Apple browser rendering web pages up to twice as fast as Internet Explorer 7 and up to 1.6 times faster than Firefox 2, Apple chief executive Steve Jobs billed Safari 3.0 as the "fastest browser running on Windows."

Safari 3 features easy-to-manage bookmarks, effortless browsing with easy-to-organize tabs and a built-in RSS reader to quickly scan the latest news and information.

Beginning today, Apple is making a Safari 3 public beta is available as a free download for Macs and PCs over at its Safari website.

"We think Windows users are going to be really impressed when they see how fast and intuitive web browsing can be with Safari," said Jobs. "Hundreds of millions of Windows users already use iTunes, and we look forward to turning them on to Safari's superior browsing experience too."

The speed of Safari combined with its intuitive user interface lets users spend more time surfing the web and less time waiting for pages to load, Apple said. Other Safari features now available to Windows users include SnapBack, one-click access to an initial search query; resizable text fields; and private browsing to ensure that information about an individual's browsing history isn't stored.

Safari 3 supports all modern Internet standards so users can view websites as they were meant to be seen, including HTML, CSS, JavaScript, SVG and Java. Safari software updates are delivered seamlessly through Apple's Software Update application, which automatically checks for updates.



Pricing & Availability

The free public beta of Safari 3 is available immediately as a download at Apple's Safari website, and is preview software licensed for use on a trial basis for a limited time. The final version of Safari 3 will be available as a feature in the upcoming Mac OS X version 10.5 Leopard, and will be available as a free download to Mac OS X Tiger and Windows users in October.

System Requirements

Safari 3 for Mac OS X requires Mac OS X Tiger 10.4.9 or later, a minimum of 256MB of memory and is designed to run on any Intel-based Mac or a Mac with a PowerPC G5, G4 or G3 processor and built-in FireWire. Safari 3 for Windows requires Windows XP or Windows Vista, a minimum of 256 MB of memory and a system with at least a 500 MHz Intel Pentium processor.
AppleInsider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2007, 02:22 PM   #11
ascii
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 791
I don't really understand the point of this.
ascii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2007, 02:23 PM   #12
aaarrrgggh
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Paradise
Posts: 402
I can't imagine the driver for this. If someone is going to go to the trouble of installing a browser, it has to be for something significant in their browsing experience... like adblock. This will be an interesting one...
aaarrrgggh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2007, 02:28 PM   #13
backtomac
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,939
Yep. I'm lost on this as well. Someone please explain the significance.
backtomac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2007, 02:31 PM   #14
hmurchison
Global Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,464
iPhone people.

Delivering iPhone apps means you have to be able to test in a suitable browser. That browser is Safari.


Mac mini - 2 , iPod Nano- 1
G4 Cube - 5 , iPod Shuffle -1
Bloggity Blog
hmurchison is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2007, 02:31 PM   #15
Dave K.
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 959
Where's the public beta for the Mac version?

It makes sense for porting Safari to Windows. Too many websites are still incompatible (along with corporate intranets) with Safari.
Dave K. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2007, 02:31 PM   #16
atari
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by backtomac View Post
Yep. I'm lost on this as well. Someone please explain the significance.
With pleasure
-) Web Apps; the larger Safari´s market share the less likely it gets Safari will be excluded.
-) Possibly (future) tie ins with ITunes and Quicktime
-) It sure can´t hurt Apple
atari is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2007, 02:31 PM   #17
mrpiddly
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 402
Im happy.
mrpiddly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2007, 02:35 PM   #18
heaven or las vegas
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 133
They ported iTunes to Windows ti support iPod. Ditto Safari for iPhone. I think that rocks. Now I can use Safari at work on my PC.
heaven or las vegas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2007, 02:36 PM   #19
fraklinc
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 206
wow the worst WWDC ever

what the heck happen there? they said the same thing as last year, what a waste of time feel sorry for everyone that whent there though, lol
fraklinc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2007, 02:36 PM   #20
coolfactor
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Van Isle, BC, Canada
Posts: 208
apple.com is redesigned. Wow.
coolfactor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2007, 02:37 PM   #21
mrpiddly
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 402
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shintocam View Post
That's nice and all, but I don't even use Safari on my Mac....

That being said, Safari will likely be better than IE - although I still have to use IE for a lot of things that use ActiveX (like some of our client server software).

Can't believe this was the "one more thing"......
The one more thing in my mind was the iPhone web 2.0 tools.
mrpiddly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2007, 02:38 PM   #22
SpinDrift
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 653
I have Safari on my PC now and I can see why Apple have done this.

Smart move I think.
SpinDrift is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2007, 02:42 PM   #23
mbaynham
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 531
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave K. View Post
Where's the public beta for the Mac version?

It makes sense for porting Safari to Windows. Too many websites are still incompatible (along with corporate intranets) with Safari.
its there. just have a look lol


"i find that if you keep talkin', your mouth comes up with stuff..." Karl Pilkington
mbaynham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2007, 02:42 PM   #24
Shintocam
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 58
Not missing anything

Quote:
Originally Posted by Idle View Post
Apparently my computer "does not meet the requirements" for the beta

According to the system requirements, a G4 iBook running 10.4.9 should work. Strange.
I have a G4 PB running 10.4.9 and got it to run. Took forever to install. Took almost as long to launch the first time. It's slow, does not use Safari Extender (not that I expected it too) and over-writes the old version of Safari (uh not a good idea with Beta software and I was pretty miffed at this - not as miffed as our friend a few posts up - but miffed non the less).

I say just download Camino and don't worry about Safari 3.0.....
Shintocam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2007, 02:42 PM   #25
Shintocam
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 58
Safari not even the best browser on OSX

That's nice and all, but I don't even use Safari on my Mac....

That being said, Safari will likely be better than IE - although I still have to use IE for a lot of things that use ActiveX (like some of our client server software).

Can't believe this was the "one more thing"......
Shintocam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2007, 02:43 PM   #26
Clive At Five
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 661
What a waste of a "One more thing!" It's exciting news, yes, but this is going to ruin my taste for "one more things" in the future. Next MWSF...

Steve: "One more thing..."
Crowd: "oh shit, hit the deck, not another Core Audio update! Here goes AAPL through the roof, buy buy buy!"



-Clive
Clive At Five is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2007, 02:44 PM   #27
Abster2core
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by hmurchison View Post
iPhone people.

Delivering iPhone apps means you have to be able to test in a suitable browser. That browser is Safari.
Unbelievable that some just don't get the significance of this. You are right on. The buzz here is euphoric. Lots of opportunities. Steve has come through again.

One anecdotal comment, "Let the naysayes vet their shit. More for us."

Safari 3 being downloads. Guys trying or want to create widgets on the spot. Love the idea of Safari for Windows. Expect a lot more Apple apps could crack the PC market or better yet, destroy it.
Abster2core is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2007, 02:44 PM   #28
>_>
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 334
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbaynham View Post
MOTHERFUCKER!!!!!!!!!!!!

just downloaded the safari demo... didnt tell me that it would delete the current version i have would be removed from my computer!!!!!!! FOR FUKES SAKE APPLE!!!!!!! I WANT MY SAFARI BACK!!! YOU BASTARDS!!!!!!!
Use the included uninstaller. It restores your "current version".

- Xidius
>_> is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2007, 02:45 PM   #29
TBaggins
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: From Parts Unknown
Posts: 2,282
Well, I was only a little off. I said that WWDC would be 90% Leopard and 10% 3rd party apps for iPhone, and it ended up being 80% Leopard, 10% 3rd party apps for iPhone, and 10% Safari for Windows.

I think Safari for Windoze is cool, too. Anything that helps loosen IE's stranglehold on the web, even a little, is great. Knock their marketshare down and get the lazier web designers to stop designing sites with only IE in mind.

.


The iPhone 3GS-
Cut-copy-paste, MMS, landscape keyboard, video-recording, voice-calling, and more... FINALLY
To the 'We Didn't Need It' Crowd/Apple Apologista Squad™ : Wrong again, lol
Thanks for listening to your users, Apple. =]
TBaggins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2007, 02:47 PM   #30
anantksundaram
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,233
Quote:
Originally Posted by TBaggins View Post
There are cash flow consequences, though. You just have to look a lil' harder.

With the new Leopard Finder working very similarly to iTunes ( http://www.apple.com/macosx/leopard/...es/finder.html ), potential Windows switchers will already know how to use a Mac, and will be more likely to switch. And if they're already using Safari on Windows, they'll obviously be able to jump over to OS X Safari without missing a beat.

It's all about increasing potential switchers' comfort level with the Mac. Which is super-important, because about half of all Mac sales nowadays are to switchers. Increasing switcher sales further would seem to be very 'bottom line', eh?

.
I think you're telling me that some users are in a place where (other than for some useful functionality, e.g., built-in spell-check) their comfort with an operating system (and hence, decision to switch) is enhanced by one point-and-click software (Safari) compared to another (IE).

Please pardon me, but that's a stretch.

Most people at that level of computer literacy already have a Mac if they could afford it. And, if they couldn't, they still probably can't, so switching is unlikely. Others who are/were potential switchers have already experienced the Mac look-and-feel from iTunes and iPods and have had their appetite for a Mac whetted by that experience. They wouldn't need Safari.

Bottom line: I don't think the use of Safari is going to amount to much from a switching standpoint.


Last edited by anantksundaram; 06-11-2007 at 03:37 PM.. Reason: poor wording
anantksundaram is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2007, 02:48 PM   #31
anantksundaram
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,233
The availability of Safari on the PC is, at best, of second-order importance to me as a Mac user and Apple shareholder (yeah, yeah, I understand the iPhone connection and the fact more sites may become Safari-firendly etc; but it's all still second-order).

Zero cash flow consequences. (Now, if he had announced something like "iLife for Windows for $89" that would have been a blockbuster from the stock price standpoint.....)

I hope the developers got something out of this. As a lay person, I was quite bored and disappointed by the WWDC. Wasted appearance by Steve.

anantksundaram is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2007, 02:49 PM   #32
backtomac
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,939
I'm pretty unexcited by Safari for Windows. While it may make sense strategically fro Apple, how is that a 'one more thing' for Mac aficionados? As well I don't think it will do all that well. IE 7 isn't to bad and FF is quite good. What's the big reason to switch?
backtomac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2007, 02:50 PM   #33
JupiterOne
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,006
Quote:
Originally Posted by koskar View Post
windows version crashes on any and all bookmark operations....
anyone or just me?
Upon startup, a dialog appears asking me for a Name/Password. I assume it is for my company's proxy. Anyway, putting in my company ID/PW, causes a crash. Useless for me at work.

Also, part of the dialog is the checkmark to "Remember this password in my keychain" Um, keychain on Windows too?
JupiterOne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2007, 02:50 PM   #34
CoolHandPete
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Nashville
Posts: 337
Quote:
Originally Posted by minderbinder View Post
Actually it wasn't there when he posted it, it took a while for them to update the safari pages on apple.com



Yeah, I have the same problem and I've seen many postings already saying this. The windows install worked fine, but it looks like the OSX version has a problem. They better fix it fast, that's a major embarrassment for the company.
This is what I was looking for - Safari 3.0 didn't install on my brand-new (July 2002) Powerbook G4... I wondered when I would be left in the dust.

5 years ain't bad, really. For a Windows user, all I would be able to use at this point would be AOL (maybe)... and probably the "You've Got Mail" sound wouldn't even play, but rather "You are obsolete!"

But it may be a little embarrassing for the company nonetheless.


CoolHandPete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2007, 02:53 PM   #35
anantksundaram
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,233
AI TIme Machine!!!?

Wow! Time travel on AI! My reply to TBaggins (whose post was at 3.08 PM), appeared at 2.47 PM!

anantksundaram is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2007, 02:56 PM   #36
addabox
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 0aktown
Posts: 9,242
I dunno, maybe my old Safari had gotten really bogged down, somehow, but.....damn.


party's over
addabox is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2007, 02:57 PM   #37
TBaggins
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: From Parts Unknown
Posts: 2,282
PS- Thought it was really subversive and cool how the new Leopard Finder was based off of iTunes.

That means the 300 million or so Windows users who've dloaded iTunes for Windows are already most of the way towards knowing how use the Leopard Finder, and will be more comfortable in switching to the Mac.

Sneaky, sneaky, sneaky.

.


The iPhone 3GS-
Cut-copy-paste, MMS, landscape keyboard, video-recording, voice-calling, and more... FINALLY
To the 'We Didn't Need It' Crowd/Apple Apologista Squad™ : Wrong again, lol
Thanks for listening to your users, Apple. =]
TBaggins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2007, 03:00 PM   #38
anantksundaram
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,233
Here's the verdict on the cash flow consequences: a $5 drop in share price. Doesn't get more direct than that!

anantksundaram is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2007, 03:00 PM   #39
Idle
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: the city by the lake
Posts: 48
Apparently my computer "does not meet the requirements" for the beta

According to the system requirements, a G4 iBook running 10.4.9 should work. Strange.
Idle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2007, 03:01 PM   #40
Bizmac
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 20
Quote:
Originally Posted by backtomac View Post
I'm pretty unexcited by Safari for Windows. While it may make sense strategically fro Apple, how is that a 'one more thing' for Mac aficionados? As well I don't think it will do all that well. IE 7 isn't to bad and FF is quite good. What's the big reason to switch?
Very fast...using it and it is as fast as opera.
Now why using it except speed for I do not know...for macfans on windows...
Bizmac is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.