Verizon continues assault on AT&T with series of holiday ads

123578

Comments

  • Reply 81 of 153
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by teckstud View Post


    Well if they showed overall coverage AT&T would lose there as well. Verizon has a blanket completely covering the entire the USA including Hawaii and Alaska .

    AT&T does not.



    Well, if they showed Global Coverage, your Verizon CDMA-only phone would not work in most of the world....your AT&T 3G phone would.



    See this map?





    <blank>





    This is the map where Verizon supports the iPhone today.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 82 of 153
    rot'napplerot'napple Posts: 1,839member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by teckstud View Post


    Apple spends much much more on TV advertising- bar none. Microsof'st is all in print advertising up to this past year.



    How much did MS pay for those Jerry Seinfeld / Bill Gates ads "about nothing"?!... I think there were only three... before MS dumped that idea... and after all that money...



    "Remember those awful Microsoft ads with Jerry Seinfeld and Bill Gates? Well, now you can forget them. Microsoft flacks are desperately dialing reporters to spin them about "phase two" of the ad campaign ? a phase, due to be announced tomorrow, which will drop the aging comic altogether. Microsoft's version of the story: Redmond had always planned to drop Seinfeld. The awkward reality: The ads only reminded us how out of touch with consumers Microsoft is ? and that Bill Gates's company has millions of dollars to waste on hiring a has-been funnyman to keep him company."



    http://valleywag.gawker.com/5051455/...e-seinfeld-ads



    How many Justin Longs ads could have been made with all that money "down the drain" ad for what, Vista!?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 83 of 153
    cameronjcameronj Posts: 2,357member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Foo2 View Post


    Apparently that's the case, just as there's no denying 1001 is a bigger number than 1000. Close is good enough in horseshoes and hand grenades. Verizon also nickle-and-dimes its customers more, too.



    You're a blind homer, apparently. ATT isn't a little worse than Verizon. Nearly everyone on ATT complains about dropped calls at some point, while Verizon users look at you and say "you drop calls? why would you put up with that?"



    Quote:

    Much is the same for many Verizon users. So what's your point?



    My point is that ATT drops far more calls and has far worse coverage. You missed that?



    Quote:

    Let me guess, it's when you're behind a hill or in a little ravine. The fact that it's predictable is a good thing, no? Are Verizon's dropped calls unpredictable... and happy?



    Exactly. Driving west 50 through courthouse. Call drops every time. Exiting 66 onto the toll road access road, dropped call every time. No, it has nothing to do with geology.



    Quote:

    Is your iPhone jailbroken?



    You've got some major jailbroke blinders on. I'm not sure where you got the idea that a large percentage of iPhones are jailbroken, but they are not. No, my iPhone is not and never has been jailbroken.



    Quote:

    Try a Verizon phone for a couple weeks and see if it doesn't drop calls when you're driving about. The parkways and major roads of DC go 'round and through some decent hills. My experience with Verizon, in the locations I cared about, was that its coverage was worse than AT&T.



    Then you'd be the only one in the DC area who claims that.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 84 of 153
    timontimon Posts: 152member
    For those of you who keep saying Verizon won't get the iPhone because Apple won't take the time to engineer a phone that does CDMA read THIS.



    If Apple uses the Qualcomm chip it's game over as that chip set will do ALL of the protocols that every carrier uses including LTE.



    Now would the Verizon, and other CDMA carriers, naysayers please shut up, thank you.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 85 of 153
    cameronjcameronj Posts: 2,357member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by anothersmartphoneuser View Post


    '3) A large majority of people do not travel outside of the US'



    That's just f***ing sad.



    I wonder what the comparable number is for Euros traveling outside the Euro area, a similarly large land mass. Americans get a bum rap for never leaving the country, in large part because we can travel far and wide without ever leaving the country!



    And yes, I travel all over the world regularly so I'm not talking about myself here. But if I lived in Kansas, NYC would be a pretty wild trip! And so would San Fran! Going from France to Germany is like going from VA to GA, but it just happens to be inside what's all the same country. The different states may not speak different languages, but the cultures are just as different as going from country to country in W Europe.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 86 of 153
    quadra 610quadra 610 Posts: 6,759member
    Too bad the ads won't really achieve much because the iPhone . . . is not available on Verizon. And the iPhone's growth isn't slowing down anytime soon.



    Here's today's MDN take:



    For Verizon to place the very device upon which their now multi-year parade of inferior knockoffs is based on an "Island of Misfit Toys" is a dramatic example of self-delusion and irony. If Apple's iPhone is on an "Island of Misfit Toys," then the best devices that Verizon can offer are are lying miles off shore, submerged, rusting, and dysfunctional under at least 50 feet of salt water. It's a cute ad, but it backfires under the least bit of scrutiny: Verizon offers wider, but slower, 3G coverage and a bunch of inferior handsets that obviously, and quite desperately, only wish they were iPhones.



    Verizon had better be careful. This is Steve Jobs they're dealing with and this ad is sure to come up, if not played on a huge screen, when Verizon again comes begging Apple for an iPhone deal. Or maybe Verizon just has a death wish: iPhone 4G in the U.S. on AT&T, T-Mobile, and Sprint.




    Spot on.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 87 of 153
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Quadra 610 View Post


    Verizon is seeing that consumers will put up with a seemingly horrible carrier just to get their hands on the iPhone, and they can't stand it.



    It must really gall Verizon that they can be just as horrible as AT&T and yet they still can't get the iPhone.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 88 of 153
    teckstudteckstud Posts: 6,476member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by noexpectations View Post


    Well, if they showed Global Coverage, your Verizon CDMA-only phone would not work in most of the world....your AT&T 3G phone would.



    See this map?





    <blank>





    This is the map where Verizon supports the iPhone today.



    True dat- but as someone else posted - what Americans travel beyond our borders? We have Disney and Las Vegas - do we really need to go anywhere else?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 89 of 153
    teckstudteckstud Posts: 6,476member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Rot'nApple View Post


    How many Justin Longs ads could have been made with all that money "down the drain" ad for what, Vista!?



    Hasta la Vista, baby! It's all about Windows 7 now.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 90 of 153
    Verizon should have spent this much money and effort on trying to get the iPhone when Apple originally offered it to them. That had to be the Business Blunder of the Decade.



    Instead of paying for all these commercials and air time, why not use the money to upgrade to 4G faster?....get on to a global standard and off of CDMA ASAP.



    It's clear to me that Verizon knows that they will not get the iPhone until they have a 4G Network that is completely rolled out (2012-13).
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 91 of 153
    I hope the rumors are true that the iPhone is coming to Verizon in Q3 2010. I want one so bad, but I am not paying $60/month for my wife and I to have 2.5G coverage in Minnesota here. ATT is a joke.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 92 of 153
    rob55rob55 Posts: 1,291member
    You know, I can't wait 'til the iPhone comes to Verizon. Then this tired debate can be put to bed. If you get better coverage with Verizon in your area, then you'll get your iPhone with them. If, like me, you get better (3G) coverage in your area from AT&T, then you'll stay with them. I drop no more calls with my iPhone than I did with my Crackberry on Verizon. Maybe after 30%-50% of AT&T iPhone subscribers switch back to Verizon, it'll tax the crap out of their network as well.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 93 of 153
    teckstudteckstud Posts: 6,476member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by surebet07 View Post


    Verizon should have spent this much money and effort on trying to get the iPhone when Apple originally offered it to them. That had to be the Business Blunder of the Decade.



    Instead of paying for all these commercials and air time, why not use the money to upgrade to 4G faster?....get on to a global standard and off of CDMA ASAP.



    It's clear to me that Verizon knows that they will not get the iPhone until they have a 4G Network that is completely rolled out (2012-13).



    I thought the Business Blunder of the Decade was the iPhone locked into AT&FEE for 3 years and counting with such lousy coverage, late MMS, and still no tethering. Imagine how much more APple could have made if the iPhone were offered on more than one carrier. As much as Apple has made off its iPhone, AT&Fee has more than made riding on its back.

    Did Apple actually think the cellphone market wasn't going to be competitive? I'm surprised it actually took this long for direct advertising attacks.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 94 of 153
    quadra 610quadra 610 Posts: 6,759member
    Verizon:



    "Come enjoy our faster, more reliable network, with a whole range of lousy phones that aren't the iPhone!"



    Winner.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 95 of 153
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by lowededwookie View Post


    I take it no one here has read Daniel's (AKA Prince McClean) article outlining legitimate reasons why "Verizon getting an iPhone" claims are unfounded. It's here for those who missed it:



    http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/1...ng-to-verizon/



    CDMA is a dying technology. Telecom here in New Zealand is ditching its CDMA network for WCDMA because it can't use its phones elsewhere in the world very easily instead having to use World Mode phones which are kind of pathetic. Also Telecom's phones have been so feature poor that Vodafone was trouncing them. Hell, Vodafone's bottom end phone has BlueTooth and web browsing which is more than some of Telecom's top end phones had.



    If Verizon is insisting on continuing using CDMA then all the features that makes the iPhone a great phone will largely be useless under CDMA. CDMA 3G is no way near as good as WCDMA and I've seen the two working side by side with a test between Vodafone's UMTS network and Telecom's CDMA network and Telecom failed miserably.



    I'm picking that in the right spots the battle between the two would probably favour AT&T instead of Verizon.



    I guess you missed the later article



    http://www.appleinsider.com/articles...n_q3_2010.html



    about the next generation of iPhone being a UMTS/CDMA hybrid and that it will be available on Verizon.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 96 of 153
    quadra 610quadra 610 Posts: 6,759member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by teckstud View Post


    I thought the Business Blunder of the Decade was the iPhone locked into AT&FEE for 3 years



    Except that the iPhone is enjoying record sales with no slowdown in sight, is about to overtake RIM, has handed AT&T record quarters, and has become the Gold Standard of smartphones. All in two years.



    Apple locking it to AT&T was a brilliant move. It has create a wicked amount of demand for the iPhone and Apple is quute pleased to listen to and deny various iPhone suitors at will. Apple has seen that the iPhone has such desirability that consumers are willing to put up with a dinosaur carrier in order to use it. Apple now knows just how far it can go with controlling carriers and just how much power it wields among them.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 97 of 153
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by teckstud View Post


    Mmmmm, I seem to recall you using the words "troll", "trolling" "resident troll" etc, etc.etc as if they are so grown up? And "stunted little mind" might just be a personal attack?



    (i) You recall wrong - can you find a post of mine that uses the word 'troll?' (ii) I said, 'symptomatic of a ......' - you should expand your own comprehension a bit more.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 98 of 153
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by teckstud View Post


    I thought the Business Blunder of the Decade was the iPhone locked into AT&FEE for 3 years and counting with such lousy coverage, late MMS, and still no tethering. Imagine how much more APple could have made if the iPhone were offered on more than one carrier. As much as Apple has made off its iPhone, AT&Fee has more than made riding on its back.

    Did Apple actually think entering the cellphone market wasn't going to be competitive? I'm surprised it actually took this long.



    3 years? Mine was 2.



    Service where I am at is great....I get 4-5 bars inside my home now. I think that AT&T installed a new tower near me....or added that new frequency that is able to penetrate walls.



    If your service is so bad, why didn't you return the phone?.....you had 30 days.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 99 of 153
    quadra 610quadra 610 Posts: 6,759member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by surebet07 View Post


    3 years? Mine was 2.



    Service where I am at is great....I get 4-5 bars inside my home now. I think that AT&T installed a new tower near me....or added that new frequency that is able to penetrate walls.



    If your service is so bad, why didn't you return the phone?.....you had 30 days.



    He's one of those that knew about AT&T and their service issues, then went ahead anyway and got an iPhone. And then keeps complaining about AT&T.



    Witness the power of the iPhone.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 100 of 153
    teckstudteckstud Posts: 6,476member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Quadra 610 View Post


    Verizon:



    "Come enjoy our faster, more reliable network, with a whole range of lousy phones that aren't the iPhone!"



    Winner.



    Like having a superhighway with no Lexus only Camaros?



    Lexus, on the other hand, stuck on country back roads!
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.