RIM's PlayBook may undercut Apple iPad at $399 - report

12345679»

Comments

  • Reply 161 of 166
    Most also work quite well without it.

    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

    And that's because Steve Jobs says so? More over if flash is so bad, why not remove it's support from Safari as well on Mac/Windows ? You know why, because people would stop using Safari as well.



    Have you folks even used Flash on Android, it's flawless and am loving it..
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 162 of 166
    tnsftnsf Posts: 203member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by bhaiwaah View Post


    Have you folks even used Flash on Android, it's flawless and am loving it..



    Thats like me saying the iPad is flawless. I don't believe it and you wouldn't believe it either.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 163 of 166
    ihxoihxo Posts: 567member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by bhaiwaah View Post


    Have you folks even used Flash on Android, it's flawless and am loving it..



    Actually that just means you have a very low expectation for "flawless".
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 164 of 166
    samabsamab Posts: 1,953member
    But it may finally be time for adobe flash to live inside mobile devices and have acceptable performance. For those who commented how the RIM Playbook looked slow on the adidas flash website video, RIM VP stated 2 days ago that the web browser is not optimized yet (it is only running on single core, not dual core yet).



    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0sEUipZkLy0
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 165 of 166
    tnsftnsf Posts: 203member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by samab View Post


    But it may finally be time for adobe flash to live inside mobile devices and have acceptable performance.



    No, its time for flash to die. The only people that benefit from flash making the leap to mobile devices are the executives at Adobe. We, the users, should be demanding something better. They've had years to get it to work and they haven't. Now its too little too late to suggest that with a dual-core, battery sucking, 1GB memory device that Flash might finally work. Seriously? The answer was just to wait until tablets because as powerful as a regular computer? Thats not innovation, thats lack of innovation.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 166 of 166
    samabsamab Posts: 1,953member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by TNSF View Post


    No, its time for flash to die. The only people that benefit from flash making the leap to mobile devices are the executives at Adobe. We, the users, should be demanding something better. They've had years to get it to work and they haven't. Now its too little too late to suggest that with a dual-core, battery sucking, 1GB memory device that Flash might finally work. Seriously? The answer was just to wait until tablets because as powerful as a regular computer? Thats not innovation, thats lack of innovation.



    It's just a different tool for web designers.



    These people who are designing a "1 minute to load" H.264 flash video splash screen will design a "1 minute to load" webM HTML5 video splash screen. If they are designing flash animations that require dual core battery sucking CPU, they will design HTML5 canvas animation that require dual core battery sucking CPU.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.