Steve Jobs on a 'down cycle' recently, at Apple offices less frequently
In the weeks leading up to Steve Jobs' announcement that he will take a medical leave of absence, he has reportedly come into the company's corporate campus less frequently and has appeared "increasingly emaciated."
Citing an anonymous source, The New York Times on Monday reported that Jobs, of late, would lunch in his office rather than where he typically would, in the company cafeteria. He also began a "down cycle" in recent weeks, and only came into the office about two days per week.
"Mr. Jobs suffers from immune system issues common with people who have received liver transplants and, as a result, his health suffers from frequent 'ups and downs,' according to a person with knowledge of the situation, who agreed to speak on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to discuss it," author Miguel Helft wrote.
Earlier Monday, Jobs announced in a letter to employees that he would take a medical leave of absence so he can focus on his health. He will remain CEO and will be involved in "major strategic decisions" for Apple.
Jobs declined to reveal exactly what his medical condition may be. He noted that he and his family would "deeply appreciate respect" for their privacy. The Apple co-founder has long said he believes his health is a private matter.
Jobs returned to work in June 2009 after a liver transplant. In subsequent interviews he was upbeat and said he felt healthy, but the report from the Times would indicate that the CEO has fallen on hard times in recent weeks.
Citing an anonymous source, The New York Times on Monday reported that Jobs, of late, would lunch in his office rather than where he typically would, in the company cafeteria. He also began a "down cycle" in recent weeks, and only came into the office about two days per week.
"Mr. Jobs suffers from immune system issues common with people who have received liver transplants and, as a result, his health suffers from frequent 'ups and downs,' according to a person with knowledge of the situation, who agreed to speak on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to discuss it," author Miguel Helft wrote.
Earlier Monday, Jobs announced in a letter to employees that he would take a medical leave of absence so he can focus on his health. He will remain CEO and will be involved in "major strategic decisions" for Apple.
Jobs declined to reveal exactly what his medical condition may be. He noted that he and his family would "deeply appreciate respect" for their privacy. The Apple co-founder has long said he believes his health is a private matter.
Jobs returned to work in June 2009 after a liver transplant. In subsequent interviews he was upbeat and said he felt healthy, but the report from the Times would indicate that the CEO has fallen on hard times in recent weeks.
Comments
Citing the New York Times these days is an adventure in fantasy land more often than not.
Why is that? Had they offended Apple(ites) in some way recently?
http://www.foxbusiness.com/static/ma...bs.1-17-11.jpg
Regardless of the real story (and who wouldn't like to know the truth, really?) all the best to Steve and his family and the people at Apple.
I absolutely concur. A big chunk of our savings are in Apple stock, but I care far less about that than that Steve be healthy and happy. Few people have ever so richly deserved that.
I absolutely concur. A big chunk of our savings are in Apple stock, but I care far less about that than that Steve be healthy and happy. Few people have ever so richly deserved that.
Agreed.
Just wonder what anyone thinks. This story, paired with his absence at the Verizon announcement at least appear to me to have a tangible relationship, now.
Any thoughts?
-D.G.
Reviewing last two health announcements.
http://www.foxbusiness.com/static/ma...bs.1-17-11.jpg
Interesting chart. Puts a little more perspective on Apple's recent climb. Still, I believe Jobs is Apple and there's no discounting his influence.
Just curious .. does anyone think that this comes into play regarding Steve's absence at the Verizon announcement last week? Or, was he really not expected to be there anyway? I had actually thought that he would have been there, possibly accompanying Tim Cook.
Just wonder what anyone thinks. This story, paired with his absence at the Verizon announcement at least appear to me to have a tangible relationship, now.
Any thoughts?
-D.G.
No. Neither CEO was present.
Just curious .. does anyone think that this comes into play regarding Steve's absence at the Verizon announcement last week? Or, was he really not expected to be there anyway? I had actually thought that he would have been there, possibly accompanying Tim Cook.
Just wonder what anyone thinks. This story, paired with his absence at the Verizon announcement at least appear to me to have a tangible relationship, now.
Any thoughts?
-D.G.
I don't think most people that follow Apple expected Steve at that announcement. So no connection IMO.
Interesting chart. Puts a little more perspective on Apple's recent climb. Still, I believe Jobs is Apple and there's no discounting his influence.
It's good to see the graph shows Steve's health and related announcements were of little effect to the AAPL stock value over a reasonable period of time. Steve would not want our faith in Apple to be shaken because of his health. I am certain they have excellent contingency plans and a years ahead of planning.
Steve get well soon........We all miss U and wish U well
Please. Didn't Jobs make it perfectly clear - respect his privacy.
Where does AppleInsider draw the line on stories?
Please. Didn't Jobs make it perfectly clear - respect his privacy.
I think freedom of speech still applies, and as Rahm Emanuel once said, "...never let a serious crisis go to waste."
I absolutely concur. A big chunk of our savings are in Apple stock, but I care far less about that than that Steve be healthy and happy.
Seriously? How does your wife feel about that? That's just way overboard IMHO.
Reviewing last two health announcements.
http://www.foxbusiness.com/static/ma...bs.1-17-11.jpg
I don't know what the story is that they published alongside this chart, but the chart itself shows absolutely nothing. There's no correlation at all between his health issues and the stock price and this chart seems to prove it.
Where does AppleInsider draw the line on stories?
Please. Didn't Jobs make it perfectly clear - respect his privacy.
While I agree with your sentiment, I don't agree that AI was disrespecting his privacy. Now, if people start clammering for intimate knowledge of his personal affairs like the last time he took a leave of absence, or publish his medical records, then that would be disrespectful of his privacy.
I don't think most people that follow Apple expected Steve at that announcement. So no connection IMO.
I at first thought it was just a new service partner and not worthy of a SJ visit, but I think Verizon made a point of sending their #2 guy to ballance the stage. Interesting note since Verizon's #2 guy is expected to take over soon and for all we know, Tim is the guy for good should SJ not be able to return. All in all, very sad news for the day.