All jellous: Samsung = next Apple! Iphone made in Korea (of Korean components), using Samsung CPU. Apple steal IP from Samsung, VIA, S3. Apple will lose lawsuit, pay billions!
I seem to be unable to parse this at the syntactic and the semantic level. I think you have just failed a Turing test.
No, you haven't asked any questions. now, you're making light of it.
\See post number 2, and quoted several times in the thread:
Is this display furnished by Samsung? Are the back wall graphics also supplied by Samsung, assuming that any of the display comes direct from them, or are those elements a part of the retailers decor, perhaps repeated on other walls removed from Samsung's display? What does the rest of the retailers shop look like?
Did the company producing the graphics receive the proper releases before creating them? If all the elements were contracted by Samsung, did they have releases to use each of the logos for marketing purposes? Is this an official Samsung-designed and supplied sales area or one created by the retailer to display Samsung products?
Quote:
Originally Posted by melgross
All I'm saying is that they should have checked it, and it's dumb to not have. That's true for any company.
If that was all you were saying we wouldn't still be posting back and forth. I'm over it. Are you?
True, but in my opinion, that doesn't count. That is standard operating procedure when defending a patent lawsuit. You pull out your guns, and file a counter complaint alleging the other party is violating some of your patents. . .
I doubt Apple was going to sue Nokia unless Apple was sued because 1) Nokia wasn't knocking Apple off terribly, 2) Nokia wasn't using Android; and 3) Nokia's products based on sales weren't a threat to Apple.
Since you don't even know who the client was (Euronics or Samsung?), why are you rushing to assume it's Samsung? And no I don't think you know near as much about trademarks and copyright as I do, dealing with it every day for 29 years.
Read back a few responses Mel, it was answered twice. Yes, I'd ask the same questions whether it's Apple, Samsung, or Mel's Poker Bar.
This is just like the gps discussion we had months back. More than once you were mistaken (but authoritive!) there too, and not once did you admit you were wrong about any of the misstatements. Just let this one go. You made a simple mistake whether you can admit it or not. It's no big deal unless you make it an issue. No one else cares.
In another article, it was made pretty clear that this is a store for Samsung, similar to what Apple does in Best Buy and other places.
You know, you are so screwed up. You don't understand when you are wrong. You were totally wrong there, and it was proven that you were wrong by several folks, and you are wrong here again, as you usually are.
This is a really simple situation. Samsung contracted to have this done, and didn't bother to specify that logos or icons were allowed to be used, and didn't check even after they used the picture on their own web site.
It be funny if they tried to sue Apple in the UK, as I think some of the courts use iPads, imagine the judge looking up the case details on an iPad, troll for Samsung.
Whoever put that display together is one clueless moron. It almost makes me want to go out and immediately purchase an Android phone, after seeing the unparalleled expertise and vast knowledge that these Android phone sellers possess. It sure makes customers feel confident when the people selling you stuff don't have the faintest clue about the product that they're selling you.
But then again, the average Android user probably wouldn't even know the difference, because their standards are pretty low to begin with.
\See post number 2, and quoted several times in the thread:
Is this display furnished by Samsung? Are the back wall graphics also supplied by Samsung, assuming that any of the display comes direct from them, or are those elements a part of the retailers decor, perhaps repeated on other walls removed from Samsung's display? What does the rest of the retailers shop look like?
Did the company producing the graphics receive the proper releases before creating them? If all the elements were contracted by Samsung, did they have releases to use each of the logos for marketing purposes? Is this an official Samsung-designed and supplied sales area or one created by the retailer to display Samsung products?
If that was all you were saying we wouldn't still be posting back and forth. I'm over it. Are you?
Sure, you posted that after you were roundly criticized. Now you're saying it to deflect from Samsung.
Ad yes, all I'm saying is that it's a dumb mistake from Samsung, because they should have checked it first.
You don't want to admit it IS their mistake. You're trying to deflect it elsewhere four some reason. The client is always responsible for the final results.
Is this display furnished by Samsung? Are the back wall graphics also supplied by Samsung, assuming that any of the display comes direct from them, or are those elements a part of the retailers decor, perhaps repeated on other walls removed from Samsung's display? What does the rest of the retailers shop look like?
Did the company producing the graphics receive the proper releases before creating them? If all the elements were contracted by Samsung, did they have releases to use each of the logos for marketing purposes? Is this an official Samsung-designed and supplied sales area or one created by the retailer to display Samsung products?
In another article, it was made pretty clear that this is a store for Samsung, similar to what Apple does in Best Buy and other places.
You know, you are so screwed up. You don't understand when you are wrong. You were totally wrong there, and it was proven that you were wrong by several folks, and you are wrong here again, as you usually are.
This is a really simple situation. Samsung contracted to have this done, and didn't bother to specify that logos or icons were allowed to be used, and didn't check even after they used the picture on their own web site.
But you won't let go of this.
Good to see you have a handle on how everything came together Mel. It's as if you were in the room as it happened. As always, you're 100% right, just as you were in every other thread.
No sense continuing. Once again you just can't admit that anything you write might be wrong.
Good to see you have a handle on how everything came together Mel. It's as if you were in the room as it happened. As always, you're 100% right, just as you were in every other thread.
No sense continuing. Once again you just can't admit that anything you write might be wrong.
I've let it go.
You pretend that you're reasonable?
You're right. I won't let go of something until someone furnishes actual roof, not some half baked junk.
Whoever put that display together is one clueless moron. It almost makes me want to go out and immediately purchase an Android phone, after seeing the unparalleled expertise and vast knowledge that these Android phone sellers possess. It sure makes customers feel confident when the people selling you stuff don't have the faintest clue about the product that they're selling you.
But then again, the average Android user probably wouldn't even know the difference, because their standards are pretty low to begin with.
Android users have low standards??? Really? When did this become an anti-android thread,
Only Android users with Samsung phones have low-standards
Yeah, they do have low standards, in my humble opinion.
And as far as I'm concerned, every thread is a potential anti-Android thread, as this is an Apple site afterall, last time that I checked.
I have an iPhone, I love it.
However, I think that you have a choice for what phone you use, but people who are dumb enough to think that Samsungs shit is Apple stuff, are low-standard.
You can't really call someone low-standards just for having an Android, I mean there are some really cool looking Android phones out there.
You can't really call someone low-standards just for having an Android, I mean there are some really cool looking Android phones out there.
Sure I can, I just did earlier. It's just my opinion, you are free to disagree with it.
And I'm not so much talking about the phones or the hardware. When I frequently say that Android is junk, I'm pretty much talking about the OS and the Android ecosystem.
You know, you are so screwed up. You don't understand when you are wrong. You were totally wrong there, and it was proven that you were wrong by several folks, and you are wrong here again, as you usually are.
By "totally wrong there" do you you mean this gps thread where I lost track of the misinformation/wrong answers you posted? You never acknowledged you were wrong there, even when I, along with a couple of others like Solipsism, presented you with proof after proof of your mistakes, and quite politely and respectfully I might add.
Start with page 2 and count the number of times you were proved wrong regarding GPS systems. Then count the number of times you owned up to any of them. Then count again the number of times I was shown to be right.
Mel, I don't know anyone else that will go to the lengths that you do to avoid admitting they made a mistake.
You'll never know what those---- South Korean Samsung executives are capable of
Deleted insults.
Ok, no racial insults here. I've deleted them. Don't do that again.
Quote:
Originally Posted by melgross
You know, you are so screwed up...
Wait, so you rightly moderate someone's racial insults one minute, and then moments later proceed to insult someone else on this board? Is it too much to ask for self-moderation and consistency? Hypocriticism has detracted from your point-scoring. Don't do that again.
Samsung has its headquarters in South Korea. *The article says that this picture is from a store in Italy. *You can't expect the people at Samsung in South Korea to know every detail about everything the company does in every country. *That would be impossible.
Samsung has its headquarters in South Korea. *The article says that this picture is from a store in Italy. *You can't expect the people at Samsung in South Korea to know every detail about everything the company does in every country. *That would be impossible.
Ok..
So let me guess, Samsung dosen't train their staff, or their training just includes "Pretend its an iPhone"
Samsung has its headquarters in South Korea. *The article says that this picture is from a store in Italy. *You can't expect the people at Samsung in South Korea to know every detail about everything the company does in every country. *That would be impossible.
Ahhh, the "Rupert Murdoch defense": Yes, that is our store. Yes, our name is all over the place. Yes, we get the profits, but no, we can't be held accountable for anything that happens there.
No, it just means that Samsung is large, and cannot be expected to know every detail about everything that it does everywhere. These icons are a small detail, something that really doesn't deserve the amount of attention that it is getting. I also see icons for McDonald's, Skype, FireFox, CNN and NASA on the wall. You think anyone from any of those companies or organizations are going to make a big issue out of their icons being used? It's actually a free promotion. Big deal.
Comments
All jellous: Samsung = next Apple! Iphone made in Korea (of Korean components), using Samsung CPU. Apple steal IP from Samsung, VIA, S3. Apple will lose lawsuit, pay billions!
I seem to be unable to parse this at the syntactic and the semantic level. I think you have just failed a Turing test.
No, you haven't asked any questions. now, you're making light of it.
Is this display furnished by Samsung? Are the back wall graphics also supplied by Samsung, assuming that any of the display comes direct from them, or are those elements a part of the retailers decor, perhaps repeated on other walls removed from Samsung's display? What does the rest of the retailers shop look like?
Did the company producing the graphics receive the proper releases before creating them? If all the elements were contracted by Samsung, did they have releases to use each of the logos for marketing purposes? Is this an official Samsung-designed and supplied sales area or one created by the retailer to display Samsung products?
All I'm saying is that they should have checked it, and it's dumb to not have. That's true for any company.
If that was all you were saying we wouldn't still be posting back and forth. I'm over it. Are you?
True, but in my opinion, that doesn't count. That is standard operating procedure when defending a patent lawsuit. You pull out your guns, and file a counter complaint alleging the other party is violating some of your patents. . .
I doubt Apple was going to sue Nokia unless Apple was sued because 1) Nokia wasn't knocking Apple off terribly, 2) Nokia wasn't using Android; and 3) Nokia's products based on sales weren't a threat to Apple.
Probably true.
Since you don't even know who the client was (Euronics or Samsung?), why are you rushing to assume it's Samsung? And no I don't think you know near as much about trademarks and copyright as I do, dealing with it every day for 29 years.
Read back a few responses Mel, it was answered twice. Yes, I'd ask the same questions whether it's Apple, Samsung, or Mel's Poker Bar.
This is just like the gps discussion we had months back. More than once you were mistaken (but authoritive!) there too, and not once did you admit you were wrong about any of the misstatements. Just let this one go. You made a simple mistake whether you can admit it or not. It's no big deal unless you make it an issue. No one else cares.
In another article, it was made pretty clear that this is a store for Samsung, similar to what Apple does in Best Buy and other places.
You know, you are so screwed up. You don't understand when you are wrong. You were totally wrong there, and it was proven that you were wrong by several folks, and you are wrong here again, as you usually are.
This is a really simple situation. Samsung contracted to have this done, and didn't bother to specify that logos or icons were allowed to be used, and didn't check even after they used the picture on their own web site.
But you won't let go of this.
But then again, the average Android user probably wouldn't even know the difference, because their standards are pretty low to begin with.
Is this display furnished by Samsung? Are the back wall graphics also supplied by Samsung, assuming that any of the display comes direct from them, or are those elements a part of the retailers decor, perhaps repeated on other walls removed from Samsung's display? What does the rest of the retailers shop look like?
Did the company producing the graphics receive the proper releases before creating them? If all the elements were contracted by Samsung, did they have releases to use each of the logos for marketing purposes? Is this an official Samsung-designed and supplied sales area or one created by the retailer to display Samsung products?
If that was all you were saying we wouldn't still be posting back and forth. I'm over it. Are you?
Sure, you posted that after you were roundly criticized. Now you're saying it to deflect from Samsung.
Ad yes, all I'm saying is that it's a dumb mistake from Samsung, because they should have checked it first.
You don't want to admit it IS their mistake. You're trying to deflect it elsewhere four some reason. The client is always responsible for the final results.
Reposted with additions.
Is this display furnished by Samsung? Are the back wall graphics also supplied by Samsung, assuming that any of the display comes direct from them, or are those elements a part of the retailers decor, perhaps repeated on other walls removed from Samsung's display? What does the rest of the retailers shop look like?
Did the company producing the graphics receive the proper releases before creating them? If all the elements were contracted by Samsung, did they have releases to use each of the logos for marketing purposes? Is this an official Samsung-designed and supplied sales area or one created by the retailer to display Samsung products?
Not nearly enough known to make any judgement.
In another article, it was made pretty clear that this is a store for Samsung, similar to what Apple does in Best Buy and other places.
You know, you are so screwed up. You don't understand when you are wrong. You were totally wrong there, and it was proven that you were wrong by several folks, and you are wrong here again, as you usually are.
This is a really simple situation. Samsung contracted to have this done, and didn't bother to specify that logos or icons were allowed to be used, and didn't check even after they used the picture on their own web site.
But you won't let go of this.
Good to see you have a handle on how everything came together Mel. It's as if you were in the room as it happened. As always, you're 100% right, just as you were in every other thread.
No sense continuing. Once again you just can't admit that anything you write might be wrong.
I've let it go.
Good to see you have a handle on how everything came together Mel. It's as if you were in the room as it happened. As always, you're 100% right, just as you were in every other thread.
No sense continuing. Once again you just can't admit that anything you write might be wrong.
I've let it go.
You pretend that you're reasonable?
You're right. I won't let go of something until someone furnishes actual roof, not some half baked junk.
Whoever put that display together is one clueless moron. It almost makes me want to go out and immediately purchase an Android phone, after seeing the unparalleled expertise and vast knowledge that these Android phone sellers possess. It sure makes customers feel confident when the people selling you stuff don't have the faintest clue about the product that they're selling you.
But then again, the average Android user probably wouldn't even know the difference, because their standards are pretty low to begin with.
Android users have low standards??? Really? When did this become an anti-android thread,
Only Android users with Samsung phones have low-standards
Android users have low standards??? Really? When did this become an anti-android thread,
Only Android users with Samsung phones have low-standards
Yeah, they do have low standards, in my humble opinion.
And as far as I'm concerned, every thread is a potential anti-Android thread, as this is an Apple site afterall, last time that I checked.
Yeah, they do have low standards, in my humble opinion.
And as far as I'm concerned, every thread is a potential anti-Android thread, as this is an Apple site afterall, last time that I checked.
I have an iPhone, I love it.
However, I think that you have a choice for what phone you use, but people who are dumb enough to think that Samsungs shit is Apple stuff, are low-standard.
You can't really call someone low-standards just for having an Android, I mean there are some really cool looking Android phones out there.
You can't really call someone low-standards just for having an Android, I mean there are some really cool looking Android phones out there.
Sure I can, I just did earlier. It's just my opinion, you are free to disagree with it.
And I'm not so much talking about the phones or the hardware. When I frequently say that Android is junk, I'm pretty much talking about the OS and the Android ecosystem.
You know, you are so screwed up. You don't understand when you are wrong. You were totally wrong there, and it was proven that you were wrong by several folks, and you are wrong here again, as you usually are.
http://forums.appleinsider.com/showt...=garmin&page=2
By "totally wrong there" do you you mean this gps thread where I lost track of the misinformation/wrong answers you posted? You never acknowledged you were wrong there, even when I, along with a couple of others like Solipsism, presented you with proof after proof of your mistakes, and quite politely and respectfully I might add.
Start with page 2 and count the number of times you were proved wrong regarding GPS systems. Then count the number of times you owned up to any of them. Then count again the number of times I was shown to be right.
Mel, I don't know anyone else that will go to the lengths that you do to avoid admitting they made a mistake.
Now can you let it go?
You'll never know what those---- South Korean Samsung executives are capable of
Deleted insults.
Ok, no racial insults here. I've deleted them. Don't do that again.
You know, you are so screwed up...
Wait, so you rightly moderate someone's racial insults one minute, and then moments later proceed to insult someone else on this board? Is it too much to ask for self-moderation and consistency? Hypocriticism has detracted from your point-scoring. Don't do that again.
Samsung has its headquarters in South Korea. *The article says that this picture is from a store in Italy. *You can't expect the people at Samsung in South Korea to know every detail about everything the company does in every country. *That would be impossible.
Ok..
So let me guess, Samsung dosen't train their staff, or their training just includes "Pretend its an iPhone"
Samsung need to look at http://cdn.macrumors.com/article-new...ntion_rate.jpg, it shows those buying a Samsung phone, don't want another one for their next phone.
Samsung has its headquarters in South Korea. *The article says that this picture is from a store in Italy. *You can't expect the people at Samsung in South Korea to know every detail about everything the company does in every country. *That would be impossible.
Ahhh, the "Rupert Murdoch defense": Yes, that is our store. Yes, our name is all over the place. Yes, we get the profits, but no, we can't be held accountable for anything that happens there.
Ok..
So let me guess, Samsung dosen't train their staff, or their training just includes "Pretend its an iPhone"
Samsung need to look at http://cdn.macrumors.com/article-new...ntion_rate.jpg, it shows those buying a Samsung phone, don't want another one for their next phone.
No, it just means that Samsung is large, and cannot be expected to know every detail about everything that it does everywhere. These icons are a small detail, something that really doesn't deserve the amount of attention that it is getting. I also see icons for McDonald's, Skype, FireFox, CNN and NASA on the wall. You think anyone from any of those companies or organizations are going to make a big issue out of their icons being used?