And they still managed to release their iPad copy well after Apple released the iPad.
Just a coincidence. No, really.
Yup. After 'decades' of research, they somehow managed to come up with their significantly redesigned products all within a few months after Apple launched their own new products, while coincidentally looking almost identical. This is some high level 'stars are aligned' biblical coincidence of epic proportions.
Samsung lawyer Charles Verhoeven of Quinn Emanuel. “We are anything but an also-ran trying to copy Apple’s technology.” Verhoeven goes on to say that Samsung is "also known for its designs" and the company has been "recognized worldwide and compared favorably” to Apple.
Yes, right... This guy is even funnier than Cheech and Chong.
"Your honor, at this time we would like to introduce the I'm Rubber & You're Glue. Everything that you say bounces off of us and lands back on you defense."
Are you saying that Apple's iPad's rectangular tablet design isn't part of the larger industry trend ? - whereas Samsung's is?
That specific detail is. But they copied more than that. They copied the general size, at a time when the palm was the standard size cue for PDAs. They copied the soft keyboard at a time when mini chicklet keys was the standard. And so on.
They also copied the use of the wide border space etc. Even the thinnest.
And all that together led to a device that when held up next to an iPad, both turned off, their own lawyer standing a mere 10 inches away couldn't tell the judge which was the iPad and which was the Galaxy without seeing the logos on the back. Ouch.
The censorship on this board is worse than communist China.
I'm what you, El Band, would likely call an Apple fanboy, but still I do feel TS is a bit too much of an activist, rather than being an impartial "moderator."
Comments
of course.
The latest one is their Chromebox that looks like a Mac mini.
To add to that, since this seems to be a thread astonishingly free of anti-Apple trolls,
Quote:
Originally Posted by AppleInsider
Samsung claims that it arrived at the designs after spending decades and $3.5 billion on research.
Decades?
And they still managed to release their iPad copy well after Apple released the iPad.
Just a coincidence. No, really.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hill60
Hey look it's a new Mac Mini:-
http://www.engadget.com/photos/samsung-chromebox-2012-review/#5051182
Samsung imitating, nah I just don't see it.
LOL
Great example of total rip-off by Samsung and bet they say we spend Billions of dollars designing their mini oops I mean chromebox.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quadra 610
Decades?
And they still managed to release their iPad copy well after Apple released the iPad.
Just a coincidence. No, really.
Yup. After 'decades' of research, they somehow managed to come up with their significantly redesigned products all within a few months after Apple launched their own new products, while coincidentally looking almost identical. This is some high level 'stars are aligned' biblical coincidence of epic proportions.
Allright there is a law suit coming on the CHeech & CHong royalty rights for the use of their name in a legal court of law.
Quote:
Samsung lawyer Charles Verhoeven of Quinn Emanuel. “We are anything but an also-ran trying to copy Apple’s technology.” Verhoeven goes on to say that Samsung is "also known for its designs" and the company has been "recognized worldwide and compared favorably” to Apple.
Yes, right... This guy is even funnier than Cheech and Chong.
Samsung's next brilliant legal defense strategy:
"Your honor, at this time we would like to introduce the I'm Rubber & You're Glue. Everything that you say bounces off of us and lands back on you defense."
Awesome. Thanks for posting that
Quote:
Originally Posted by GTR
Good thing it wasn't the 'Cheech, Chong, and Chewbacca' test.
This quote cracks me up:
Samsung claims that it arrived at the designs after spending decades and $3.5 billion on research.
Show us the records.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tooltalk
Are you saying that Apple's iPad's rectangular tablet design isn't part of the larger industry trend ? - whereas Samsung's is?
That specific detail is. But they copied more than that. They copied the general size, at a time when the palm was the standard size cue for PDAs. They copied the soft keyboard at a time when mini chicklet keys was the standard. And so on.
They also copied the use of the wide border space etc. Even the thinnest.
And all that together led to a device that when held up next to an iPad, both turned off, their own lawyer standing a mere 10 inches away couldn't tell the judge which was the iPad and which was the Galaxy without seeing the logos on the back. Ouch.
Hey look it's a new Mac Mini:-
http://www.engadget.com/photos/samsung-chromebox-2012-review/#5051182
Samsung imitating, nah I just don't see it.
LOL
LOL Apple really does have rights to everything either square or rectangular.Quote:
Originally Posted by El Band
LOL Apple really does have rights to everything either square or rectangular.
Tune. MHD. iBanned. Angler.
Enjoy your fifth ban.
Tune. MHD. iBanned. Angler.
Enjoy your fifth ban.
You left out Amoled. It's fun terrorizing you with the truth.Quote:
Originally Posted by El Band
It's fun terrorizing you with the truth.
It's fun banning liars. Goes full circle, I guess.
Quote:
Originally Posted by charlituna
Show us the records.
The records show Sammy bought a couple iphones and ipads and lots of "dinners" at gentlemen clubs in the Cupertino area.
It's fun banning liars. Goes full circle, I guess.
The censorship on this board is worse than communist China.Quote:
Originally Posted by El Band
The censorship on this board is worse than communist China.I'm what you, El Band, would likely call an Apple fanboy, but still I do feel TS is a bit too much of an activist, rather than being an impartial "moderator."