Google's Brin says smartphones are antisocial, 'emasculating'

Posted:
in General Discussion edited June 2014
Sergey Brin may pull in a good deal of money from the sale of smartphones running his company's Android operating system, but the Google co-founder recently aired some unflattering opinions on the devices, calling them "emasculating" and offering Google Glass as a solution to the societal problems they pose.

Glass


On Wednesday, Brin took the stage at TED2013, sporting his now ever-present Google Glass unit, and said the rise of the smartphone has led to people essentially getting addicted to antisocial behavior, according to the TED Blog.

"The cell phone is a nervous habit," Brin explained. "If I smoked, I'd probably smoke instead, it'd look cooler. But I whip this out and look as if I have something important to do."

While the increasingly ubiquitous smartphone has given users access to more data in more places than ever before, Brin says the way people access that data requires them to disconnect from the world around them. In fact, he says, the reliance on smartphones is somewhat degrading.

"Is this the way you're meant to interact with other people?" Brin continued. "It's kind of emasculating. You're just rubbing this featureless piece of glass. Is this what you're meant to do with your body?"

Google Glass, the wearable computing device developed by Brin's Google X Lab group, is his way of moving past the hunched, glass screen interactions that have come to characterize the mobile data experience.

"When we started Google 15 years ago," he explained, "my vision was that information would come to you as you need it. You wouldn't have to query at all."

Brin hopes that the head-mounted computing unit will allow people to leave their smartphones in their pockets, instead calling up information when they need it and going about their lives when they don't.

Google Glass will be compatible with both iPhones and Android handsets when it becomes available to consumers some time later this year. Wearable computing has become an increasingly popular concept in the tech media, and rumors abound that Apple is working on an iWatch as well as experimenting with head-mounted displays.
«1345

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 91
    he might be onto something in relation to the idea that folks are always looking down at their phones and not at the world

    but on the 'emasculating' part. has he looked in the mirror lately
  • Reply 2 of 91

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by AppleInsider View Post



    "Is this the way you're meant to interact with other people?" Brin continued. "It's kind of emasculating. You're just rubbing this featureless piece of glass. Is this what you're meant to do with your body?"


     


    So Brin has experience with emasculation?


     


    image

  • Reply 3 of 91
    At least when you stare at smartphone, everyone can see that you are not paying attention. With glasses, no clue.
  • Reply 4 of 91
    There is nothing more emasculating than wearing Google Glass(es).
  • Reply 5 of 91
    aaronjaaronj Posts: 1,595member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by jason98 View Post



    At least when you stare at smartphone, everyone can see that you are not paying attention. With glasses, no clue.


     


    The funny thing about what he's saying (besides the fact that I don't think "emasculating" means what he thinks it means) is that someone using Glass isn't going to be any more connected to the person they're with than looking down at a smartphone.


     


    Glass could be a revolution for POV porn, though.

  • Reply 6 of 91


    He is not a salesman, nor showman nor visionary. He couldn't make a sale for a john in a brothell.

  • Reply 7 of 91


    This will never be a solution until you can tap into an overlay of the optic nerve viewport. on the side of the temple with a minute device that using MEMS can activate and deactivate with a touch.

  • Reply 8 of 91
    gazoobeegazoobee Posts: 3,754member
    Everyone's focussing on how foolish this description of "emasculating" is, but I think it rather obvious that he just doesn't understand what the word means.

    It makes no sense because he used the wrong word, and being a big famous "smart guy" he will never be able to admit it.
  • Reply 9 of 91
    Not taking advice on how to look cool from a guy who looks like a douchebag wearing that thing..
  • Reply 10 of 91
    Ridiculous. He just wants to sell his creepy stalker spectacles. These are some of the places where wearing google glass is emasculating because they won't let you in, or even let you hang around outside for fear that you are photographing/videoing/surveilling/casing the joint: Military bases, federal agencies, banks, concert halls, moviehouses and theatres, health clubs, sports arenas, airliners, museums, jewellers, national monuments, powerplants, water filtration plants, armaments factories, border crossings, airports, and most important of all, my house. I'm sure not talking to anyone who's wearing those creepy stalker glasses. And I'm certainly going to pull my daughter away if you talk to her with your creepy stalker glasses on.

    Only a geek with severely impaired social skills would think that this product would be acceptable for use in your day-to-day business. If you're going to wear this all day long, you might as well put an "I'm creepy" sign on your forehead.

    This is going to be a major flop because nobody wants to be around some guy who just might be taking pictures or videos of you.
  • Reply 11 of 91
    nagrommenagromme Posts: 2,834member
    He should stop trying to date smartphones, and they'll stop rejecting him.
  • Reply 12 of 91
    rogifanrogifan Posts: 10,669member


    Wow I didn't know TED talks were basically infomercials for companies.

  • Reply 13 of 91
    sflocalsflocal Posts: 6,096member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by jason98 View Post



    At least when you stare at smartphone, everyone can see that you are not paying attention. With glasses, no clue.

     




    From what I've seen in photos, videos, and articles from establishments commenting on those wearing them, the placement of the mirror is slightly below one's eyebrow and the users look like they're gazing up taking one's eyes off from whomever they may be interacting with.



    So honestly, I'd rather have some person looking down being visibly rude and inconsiderate as opposed to some guy mimicking a zombie looking around aimlessly.

  • Reply 14 of 91
    hydrhydr Posts: 146member
  • Reply 15 of 91


    "You're just rubbing this featureless piece of glass. Is this what you're meant to do with your body?"


     


    Am I the only person that mentally changes "glass" to "wood" and then has a really good chuckle about this article because emasculation sounds like something naughty? 

  • Reply 16 of 91
    I agree with Brin, Google has exhibited plenty of antisocial behaviour in the way it's entered the smartphone market, especially with how Eric Schmidt lied to Steve Jobs and Apple's board¡ :D


    [B]antisocial[/B] |??æn(t)i?so???l|
    [I]adjective
    [/I]- contrary to the laws and customs of society; devoid of or antagonistic to sociable instincts or practices:
  • Reply 17 of 91


    Rich idiot, one-trick pony.


     


    Maybe he can speak with authority on Internet search, but on any other topic, he has about as much gravitas as Rob Enderle.

  • Reply 18 of 91
    gazoobeegazoobee Posts: 3,754member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Wurm5150 View Post



    Not taking advice on how to look cool from a guy who looks like a douchebag wearing that thing..


     


    The stupid thing is "emasculation" literally means "taking away one's manliness."  He's not even saying that Google glasses look cooler or less dorky, he's saying that people who use smartphones are somehow gay or effeminate and implying that "real men" would use Google glasses instead.  


     


    I mean what kind of a f*cked up comment is that to make?  Is it still 1950?  Guys are all supposed to worry about how "manly" they look using this or that technology?  


     


    I'm surprised more women haven't jumped all over the comment and beat the sh*t out of him for saying it.  


    The main reason I believe that he probably just doesn't understand the meaning of the word is that it's such a colosally offensive thing to say if he actually does.   

  • Reply 19 of 91
    paxmanpaxman Posts: 4,729member
    I can see that the phone has for many become a nervous habit akin to smoking. Checking the phone is like a nervous tick, or a distraction. Don't know what to do? Check the phone.
    But be that as it may I hardly think rolling your eyes upward to take a peak at your Glass will in any way improve things. On the contrary, once that becomes a nervous habit for people things will get very freaky.
  • Reply 20 of 91
    slurpyslurpy Posts: 5,384member
    And a fucking thing on your face isn't emasculating at all.

    Brinn's wife...



    No, there's nothing rude, antisocial, or awkward at all about constantly iterrupting a conversation with "OK GLASS!!" and tapping your glasses. That video shows just show creepy and stalkerish that thing is. She pretty much recorded him and shared it without his knowledge.
Sign In or Register to comment.