Rumor: Apple's next-gen iPhone will launch with 'at least two screen sizes'

12346»

Comments

  • Reply 101 of 112
    v5vv5v Posts: 1,357member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by hungover View Post


    Previously, 3.5" was the perfect size. I guess some people see perfect as being relative...



     


    By "some people" you mean "Apple?" Because they are the ones that make the claim.

  • Reply 102 of 112
    solipsismxsolipsismx Posts: 19,566member
    v5v wrote: »
    By "some people" you mean "Apple?" Because they are the ones that make the claim.

    When did they ever make such a claim in regards to it being the only size that should ever be on phone display?
  • Reply 103 of 112
    v5vv5v Posts: 1,357member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by SolipsismX View Post



    When did they ever make such a claim in regards to it being the only size that should ever be on phone display?


     


    What is it with you and absolutes all the time? You seem to frequently take a rather general and/or innocuous statement and dispute it based on a level of specificity not contained in or intended by the words.


     


    No one ever said it's the ONLY size, Apple's marketing referred to it as "the perfect size" for people who apparently have had one arm amputated or something.

  • Reply 104 of 112
    tallest skiltallest skil Posts: 43,388member


    Originally Posted by SolipsismX View Post

    When did they ever make such a claim in regards to it being the only size that should ever be on phone display?


     


    It's v5v. Ignore it.





    Originally Posted by v5v View Post

    What is it with you and absolutes all the time?




    "He said something."


    "Do you have proof?"

    "WHAT IS IT WITH PEOPLE AND PROOF?!"


     


    Why do you think this is a valid argument?






    …Apple's marketing referred to it as "the perfect size" for people who apparently have had one arm amputated or something.






    And now you're off on a tangent both ludicrous and unrelated. Nice try.

  • Reply 105 of 112
    v5vv5v Posts: 1,357member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Tallest Skil View Post


    And now you're off on a tangent both ludicrous and unrelated. Nice try.



     


    Am I wrong? Did Apple NOT refer to the 3.5" screen as "the perfect size" for one-handed operation? I'm sure I remember that sentiment being expressed on Apple's web site, but obviously I can't call it up to check it since the relevant page no longer exists.


     


    If I'm wrong and Apple didn't say that, just call me Emily LItella.

  • Reply 106 of 112
    v5vv5v Posts: 1,357member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Tallest Skil View Post


    "He said something."


    "Do you have proof?"

    "WHAT IS IT WITH PEOPLE AND PROOF?!"


     


    Why do you think this is a valid argument?



     


    "Michael Bay movies have more explosions than a convention of epileptic suicide bombers."


     


    "You have not adequately quantified the number of explosions likely to occur at said convention and thus your statement is invalid."


     


    True, but not really the point, y'know? That's all I meant.

  • Reply 107 of 112
    hungoverhungover Posts: 603member


    the "“3.5 inch handset size is the “sweet spot” for mobile phone design; big enough to produce detailed, legible graphics, but small enough to fit comfortably in the hand and pocket.”"-  S Jobs


     


    I guess that the above is suggesting that 3.5" is the optimal size in a tug o' war of trade offs. Who knows? perhaps Apple have discovered that hands and pockets have got bigger recently.


     


    Not sure if Apple/jobs ever used the word "perfect" or not but Apple do seem to be particularly fond of describing characteristics as being perfect which is fine until you later decide to deviate away from that "perfect" characteristic.

  • Reply 108 of 112
    tallest skiltallest skil Posts: 43,388member


    Originally Posted by hungover View Post

    I guess that the above is suggesting that 3.5" is the optimal size in a tug o' war of trade offs. Who knows? perhaps Apple have discovered that hands and pockets have got bigger recently.


     


    You'll notice they didn't change anything that conflicts with the original message.

  • Reply 109 of 112
    philboogiephilboogie Posts: 7,675member
    hungover wrote: »
    I guess that the above is suggesting that 3.5" is the optimal size in a tug o' war of trade offs. Who knows? perhaps Apple have discovered that hands and pockets have got bigger recently.

    You'll notice they didn't change anything that conflicts with the original message.

    That's true. Also if they were to make a smaller phone.
  • Reply 110 of 112
    v5vv5v Posts: 1,357member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Tallest Skil View Post


    You'll notice they didn't change anything that conflicts with the original message.



     


    You'll also notice that I wasn't wrong.

  • Reply 111 of 112
    hungoverhungover Posts: 603member

    Quote:


    Originally Posted by Tallest Skil View Post

     




    Quote:

    Originally Posted by hungover View Post



    I guess that the above is suggesting that 3.5" is the optimal size in a tug o' war of trade offs. Who knows? perhaps Apple have discovered that hands and pockets have got bigger recently.

     




     


    You'll notice they didn't change anything that conflicts with the original message.



    True.


     


    But by their definition they have a sub-optimal screen size on the current phone

  • Reply 112 of 112
    tallest skiltallest skil Posts: 43,388member


    Originally Posted by hungover View Post

    True.


     


    But by their definition they have a sub-optimal screen size on the current phone



     


    So you agree with me but then you ignore that and choose not to agree with me?

Sign In or Register to comment.