Reporters? Wedding photographers? (Let someone back at home base realtime edit the incoming photos and have a book ready by the end of reception, to hand out.)
I have several friends who bought those EyeFi camera SD cards simply because it would upload their pictures automatically whenever they got near a hotspot. They'd love an LTE version.
Not every product in the world needs to sell in the hundreds of millions. Heck, look at Apple TV. It's been just a "hobby" for years.
The better commercial for that feature was the Dad changing a diaper for the first time, while watching an instructional video he found. He'd look at a step, then do it (while the video automatically paused), then look back at the video which triggered the next step, and so forth.
It doesn't videotape you. It just constantly watches for your face. Apple has filed for similar patents, for similar purposes.
I do see some good use of EyeFi products and other wireless technology for photographer. What I questioned is bundling an semi-pro SLR camera with an Android Phone, I'm sure most professional photographer will avoid those kinds of gadgets at all cost, for everybody else there is many more cheaper and subsidized alternative.
I can't stand PowerPoint for still using print units over pixel perfect units when nobody print their slides on acetate anymore, everything looks blurry on screen.
I can't stand when nobody print their slides anymore, PowerPoint is still using print units over pixel perfect units. Everything looks blurry.
Indeed, these hand-outs are pretty crappy. In my experience, and I've seen my share of PP presentations, the slides beamed, sometimes even just on a wall, look awful as well. The person creating the PP never seem to test it on the big screen themselves.
I had to do a presentation myself one time, couldn't take in a MacBook, so used a Wintel, and mainly expressed myself with pictures, hardly any words. And when I did add some text, I made it so large people all the way in the back of the room could read it. And I made a statement to boot.
Indeed, these hand-outs are pretty crappy. In my experience, and I've seen my share of PP presentations, the slides beamed, sometimes even just on a wall, look awful as well. The person creating the PP never seem to test it on the big screen themselves.
I had to do a presentation myself one time, couldn't take in a MacBook, so used a Wintel, and mainly expressed myself with pictures, hardly any words. And when I did add some text, I made it so large people all the way in the back of the room could read it. And I made a statement to boot.
According to Guy "Evangelist" Kawasaki the rule of thumb for fonts size in a PowerPoint presentation is: the oldest person in your audience divide it by two:
According to Guy "Evangelist" Kawasaki the rule of thumb for fonts size in a PowerPoint presentation is: the oldest person in your audience divide it by two:
Comments
So the past three years of Apple's actual actions haven't proven to you that they're not going to make a touchscreen OS X device? :no:
Rule of thumb with this sort of post: you have to actually be on the right side of the argument for it to be effective.
If it were released this year we look at a line of
Ipad mini
High res non retina 7.9
A6
16 gb-$330
32 gb-$430
64 gb-$530
128gb-$630
10 hour web
Regular IPad
Retina 9.7 inch
A7(x)
32 gb-$500
63 gb-$600
138gb-$700
12 hour web
Ipad 15 inch
Retina 15.4 inch
A7(X)
64 gb-$1000
128gb-$1100
256gb-$1200
Quote:
Originally Posted by KDarling
Reporters? Wedding photographers? (Let someone back at home base realtime edit the incoming photos and have a book ready by the end of reception, to hand out.)
I have several friends who bought those EyeFi camera SD cards simply because it would upload their pictures automatically whenever they got near a hotspot. They'd love an LTE version.
Not every product in the world needs to sell in the hundreds of millions. Heck, look at Apple TV. It's been just a "hobby" for years.
The better commercial for that feature was the Dad changing a diaper for the first time, while watching an instructional video he found. He'd look at a step, then do it (while the video automatically paused), then look back at the video which triggered the next step, and so forth.
It doesn't videotape you. It just constantly watches for your face. Apple has filed for similar patents, for similar purposes.
I do see some good use of EyeFi products and other wireless technology for photographer. What I questioned is bundling an semi-pro SLR camera with an Android Phone, I'm sure most professional photographer will avoid those kinds of gadgets at all cost, for everybody else there is many more cheaper and subsidized alternative.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AppeX
1. Keynote excels on some features, but PowerPoint excels on others. You may need one or the other.
Beside being the de facto formats for sending stupid joke to your co-worker, name me one thing of which PowerPoint excels?
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhilBoogie
Good one,
I can't stand PowerPoint for still using print units over pixel perfect units when nobody print their slides on acetate anymore, everything looks blurry on screen.
Indeed, these hand-outs are pretty crappy. In my experience, and I've seen my share of PP presentations, the slides beamed, sometimes even just on a wall, look awful as well. The person creating the PP never seem to test it on the big screen themselves.
I had to do a presentation myself one time, couldn't take in a MacBook, so used a Wintel, and mainly expressed myself with pictures, hardly any words. And when I did add some text, I made it so large people all the way in the back of the room could read it. And I made a statement to boot.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhilBoogie
Indeed, these hand-outs are pretty crappy. In my experience, and I've seen my share of PP presentations, the slides beamed, sometimes even just on a wall, look awful as well. The person creating the PP never seem to test it on the big screen themselves.
I had to do a presentation myself one time, couldn't take in a MacBook, so used a Wintel, and mainly expressed myself with pictures, hardly any words. And when I did add some text, I made it so large people all the way in the back of the room could read it. And I made a statement to boot.
According to Guy "Evangelist" Kawasaki the rule of thumb for fonts size in a PowerPoint presentation is: the oldest person in your audience divide it by two:
http://blog.guykawasaki.com/2005/12/the_102030_rule.html
Too funny! And sad, because I couldn't agree more.
Thanks!