C+... For the year 2013 those are some pretty miserable scores. I'm sure, I hope, that both companies are pretty disappointed in the the performance of these products.
1. Google was quick to see an important Apple innovation and move in that direction. Have they achieved parity? Don't know, since I've never used Google Now. But once again, Google is having to follow where Apple is leading. The same will be true of the fingerprint sensor and the 64-bit microprocessor.
2. I am curious about what version of Android is required for Google Now to work, and what devices it's limited to. My guess is that there are far more Siri-capable devices in the wild than Google Now-capable devices, and that a larger percentage of capable Apple devices, versus Android devices, are used actively.
Google Now works on any Android phone, 4.1+. Since technically there's an iOS version of it, and no Siri for Android, there's clearly more Google Now capable devices in the big picture. As for platform vs platform at this juncture it's probably a slight lead for Siri depending on how you want to size the global market which is obviously a heated topic by itself. iPhone 4 which is still pretty common doesn't have Siri, and ~56% of Android devices are 4.1+
Google Now is still faster at delivering information and a lot better at answering complex queries via the knowledge graph.
Both perform terribly in foreign languages. In French or Italian, Siri doesn't do half of the cool stuff it does in English. No wolfram alpha, no movie showtimes and a voice recognition that's not very good compared to english. I'd use it in English, but I often need to tell something in french (the name of a restaurant or just the name of a person).
One thing I'd like for Siri is that ability to teach it how to pronounce foreign names. I've got a friend with a name that's written in a complex way. Every time I try to teach Siri, she doesn't understand, probably because the sound she hears is so different from the way it's written.
One thing I'd like for Siri is that ability to teach it how to pronounce foreign names. I've got a friend with a name that's written in a complex way. Every time I try to teach Siri, she doesn't understand, probably because the sound she hears is so different from the way it's written.
I'm not sure it works for French but for English it's a new feature since iOS 7b2.
Math score D-
Maybe they were using Excel on a Surface.
I think C+ is a pretty lame conclusion when the majority of the scores are in the mid 90's and the average is nearly 90%.
Surely the best one should be a milestone that others are compared against.
That's quite common with rounded numbers. If the results were 93.5% and 6.5% which equal 100%, but they were rounded to the nearest whole number you end up with 94% and 7%.
One thing this test doesn't show is conversational commands, which is central to Siri's genius. On Siri you can ask "How is the weather today?" and it'll give you an answer, then you can follow-up that question with "How about tomorrow?".
Shouldn't a 79% rating be a B+? I know different countries have different grading systems,but a C+ rating makes me question siri's reliability and if I was a new consumer, I wouldn't buy or use the product. A 'B' would be average, meeting expectations.
Shouldn't a 79% rating be a B+? I know different countries have different grading systems,but a C+ rating makes me question siri's reliability and if I was a new consumer, I wouldn't buy or use the product. A 'B' would be average, meeting expectations.
It depends on what you're measuring. For some things, being less than perfect is a Fail. Note that a score of 100% can still be less than perfect and therefore a Fail. For instance, how many dead pixels does Apple allow before they say a display panel isn't suitable for their Macs? My MBP has over 5.1 million pixels so if 99% of the pixels were working that could mean 77,760 dead pixels and still get a score of 98.5% which rounds to 99%, or if we are doing whole number only that would be 51,840 dead pixels. Apple used to allow a couple dead pixels but I don't think they've allowed any for years now.
Shouldn't a 79% rating be a B+? I know different countries have different grading systems,but a C+ rating makes me question siri's reliability and if I was a new consumer, I wouldn't buy or use the product. A 'B' would be average, meeting expectations.
Last I checked A grades were 91-100, B grades were 81-90, and C grades 71-80.
I just want Apple to get into robots in a huge way to take on Google and Rubin, so you would have a walking, talking representation of Siri as your office worker/assistant for real-world tasks (walk the dog, go to the post office, get groceries, mow the lawn, analyze my golf swing and show me some pointers, etc.)...
I just want Apple to get into robots in a huge way to take on Google and Rubin, so you would have a walking, talking representation of Siri as your office worker/assistant for real-world tasks (walk the dog, go to the post office, get groceries, mow the lawn, analyze my golf swing and show me some pointers, etc.)...
One thing this test doesn't show is conversational commands, which is central to Siri's genius. On Siri you can ask "How is the weather today?" and it'll give you an answer, then you can follow-up that question with "How about tomorrow?".
Google Now also has a conversational mode and will answer the same types of followup questions as Siri.
It depends on what you're measuring. For some things, being less than perfect is a Fail.
Yes, and this just in from JD Power and Associates:
"Our report resulted in Samsung achieving an A+ in voice recognition."
They also responded to skepticism, "While losing in all other categories of voice recognition testing, it was the cheapest, so well...it was calculated based on our complex formulation to have the best one."
Comments
For the year 2013 those are some pretty miserable scores. I'm sure, I hope, that both companies are pretty disappointed in the the performance of these products.
1. Google was quick to see an important Apple innovation and move in that direction. Have they achieved parity? Don't know, since I've never used Google Now. But once again, Google is having to follow where Apple is leading. The same will be true of the fingerprint sensor and the 64-bit microprocessor.
2. I am curious about what version of Android is required for Google Now to work, and what devices it's limited to. My guess is that there are far more Siri-capable devices in the wild than Google Now-capable devices, and that a larger percentage of capable Apple devices, versus Android devices, are used actively.
Google Now works on any Android phone, 4.1+. Since technically there's an iOS version of it, and no Siri for Android, there's clearly more Google Now capable devices in the big picture. As for platform vs platform at this juncture it's probably a slight lead for Siri depending on how you want to size the global market which is obviously a heated topic by itself. iPhone 4 which is still pretty common doesn't have Siri, and ~56% of Android devices are 4.1+
Google Now is still faster at delivering information and a lot better at answering complex queries via the knowledge graph.
Both perform terribly in foreign languages. In French or Italian, Siri doesn't do half of the cool stuff it does in English. No wolfram alpha, no movie showtimes and a voice recognition that's not very good compared to english. I'd use it in English, but I often need to tell something in french (the name of a restaurant or just the name of a person).
One thing I'd like for Siri is that ability to teach it how to pronounce foreign names. I've got a friend with a name that's written in a complex way. Every time I try to teach Siri, she doesn't understand, probably because the sound she hears is so different from the way it's written.
Check again.
That was a very good and objective test. The panel of questions they asked is fair.
Un-Controlled Environment - iOS7 Dec-13
94%
7%
Total of 101%
Math score D-
Maybe they were using Excel on a Surface.
I think C+ is a pretty lame conclusion when the majority of the scores are in the mid 90's and the average is nearly 90%.
Surely the best one should be a milestone that others are compared against.
I'm not sure it works for French but for English it's a new feature since iOS 7b2.
That's quite common with rounded numbers. If the results were 93.5% and 6.5% which equal 100%, but they were rounded to the nearest whole number you end up with 94% and 7%.
Check again.
One thing this test doesn't show is conversational commands, which is central to Siri's genius. On Siri you can ask "How is the weather today?" and it'll give you an answer, then you can follow-up that question with "How about tomorrow?".
Someone’s getting a D- this semester.
It depends on what you're measuring. For some things, being less than perfect is a Fail. Note that a score of 100% can still be less than perfect and therefore a Fail. For instance, how many dead pixels does Apple allow before they say a display panel isn't suitable for their Macs? My MBP has over 5.1 million pixels so if 99% of the pixels were working that could mean 77,760 dead pixels and still get a score of 98.5% which rounds to 99%, or if we are doing whole number only that would be 51,840 dead pixels. Apple used to allow a couple dead pixels but I don't think they've allowed any for years now.
Last I checked A grades were 91-100, B grades were 81-90, and C grades 71-80.
I just want Apple to get into robots in a huge way to take on Google and Rubin, so you would have a walking, talking representation of Siri as your office worker/assistant for real-world tasks (walk the dog, go to the post office, get groceries, mow the lawn, analyze my golf swing and show me some pointers, etc.)...
Sirigates?
[VIDEO]
Google Now also has a conversational mode and will answer the same types of followup questions as Siri.
It depends on what you're measuring. For some things, being less than perfect is a Fail.
Yes, and this just in from JD Power and Associates:
"Our report resulted in Samsung achieving an A+ in voice recognition."
They also responded to skepticism, "While losing in all other categories of voice recognition testing, it was the cheapest, so well...it was calculated based on our complex formulation to have the best one."
:-)
C+ compared to what other voice recognition software or product?
God, our expectations are so high for little smart phones.
Siri works freaking great. It's better with every iteration.
What do we expect smart phones to do? Cook us pancakes and bacon?
That's what the original Apple TV is for.