, "Samsung incorrectly claims that Apple made recent offers to Samsung without anti-cloning provisions. Every offer Apple made to Samsung has included limits to both the scope of any license and a prohibition against cloning Apple products."
I love how Samsung blatantly, outright lies about this.
No one was misled, nothing was misrepresented. I fail to see how explicitly following the instructions given is “not explicitly following the instructions given”. Is the UK really that broken?
Show me the part of the original court order that disallowed the content Apple posted.
The page I linked literally cites a media source and mentions that many others were cited that had a clear misunderstanding about the nature of the court order. Apple can comply exactly with the words of an order but fail to meet its spirit. This is indeed exactly what happened:
Quote:
Mr Beloff suggested that we had no jurisdiction to make a further order. But he accepted that the court has power to vary its orders to make their meaning and intention clear. The meaning and intention of the first order was plain: to require Apple to publicise properly that there was no infringement of the registered design. The proposed order now sought does no more than that.
Apple were ordered to place a revised notice exactly as a result of adding their material to the original, resulting in the 'meaning and intention' of the original order becoming unclear.
You can fight the facts all you like, but you've already abandoned some of your arguments and are now falling back on insulting my country's legal system, a system which literally provides the foundation for yours. Please don't be so ridiculously obtuse. The links I provided give excellent detail on exactly what happened and why.
You people still believe this! We have to laugh because otherwise we’d burst into tears.
Originally Posted by ItsTheInternet
The page I linked literally cites a media source and mentions that many others were cited that had a clear misunderstanding about the nature of the court order. Apple can comply exactly with the words of an order but fail to meet its spirit. This is indeed exactly what happened:
Apple. Did. Exactly. What. The. Court. Stated. No one can read what was posted and fail to comprehend that they lost to Samsung in the UK. You cannot possibly state otherwise.
Apple were ordered to place a revised notice exactly as a result of adding their material to the original, resulting in the 'meaning and intention' of the original order becoming unclear.
They have no jurisdiction over any order but their own. Apple can post whatever it wants about any other order they received. You fail to comprehend this.
…are now falling back on insulting my country’s legal system…
Sure thing. That’s what’s happening.
…a system which literally provides the foundation for yours.
If Apple wants to get rid of competition they should just release iPhone 4c at 99$..and game over for Samscum (a company that kills people, cheats, lies and makes bad products),
No LG were not very successful with the Prada (as you very well know), mostly because they lacked a snake-oil-salesman, a la Steve Jobs.
Successful or not, this does not change the fact that the LG Prada was the first smart phone.
Watch and learn:
The Prada was nowhere near a landmark phone, it's not even an apps phone. The whole smartphone concept was established way before LG with the Palm Treo, Windows Mobile Phones and Noka-Sony-Ericsson Symbian phones.
If Apple is able to obtain a permanent US injunction against Samsung, they are looking at some massive leverage towards negotiations against samsung. Everyday now is edging closer to Apples payday. Keep em sweating Tim.
You do know that Samsung no longer sells most if not all the devices an injunction would cover.
Apple need to realise its not 2008 any more and that they don't own a patent on rounded rectangles. Did Sammy take design queues from apple back in 2008? of course but come on apply it's time to put your time and money into producing NEW products, you've done nothing but iterate and procrastinate for 4 years.
Tell coke, it isn't 1920. They should stop defending the curvy bottle design.
My oh my the trolls are out in force. What time is it in SK?
If Apple wants to get rid of competition they should just release iPhone 4c at 99$..and game over for Samscum (a company that kills people, cheats, lies and makes bad products),
Because at that price they'd get rid of themselves as well.
And what about all the Palm, BB, HP, etc smartphones that preceded it?
You know, I had a Windows Mobile smartphone (actually two I think) before the iPhone. God it was awful. I don't really know much about the competitors back then but compared to smartphones of today the WM ones were more proto-smartphones.
The thing is, I don't think there's really a strict line you can draw between these sorts of phones. I can't think of a great way to distinguish where proto becomes real-smartphone.
Comments
You sir needs to learn some manners...
Up yours.
Then why aren't you on lgpradainsider?
Up yours.
That's juvenile....
*Banned*
I love how Samsung blatantly, outright lies about this.
If so, they must have been pretty successful.
Then why aren't you on lgpradainsider?
No LG were not very successful with the Prada (as you very well know), mostly because they lacked a snake-oil-salesman, a la Steve Jobs.
Successful or not, this does not change the fact that the LG Prada was the first smart phone.
Watch and learn:
No one was misled, nothing was misrepresented. I fail to see how explicitly following the instructions given is “not explicitly following the instructions given”. Is the UK really that broken?
Show me the part of the original court order that disallowed the content Apple posted.
The page I linked literally cites a media source and mentions that many others were cited that had a clear misunderstanding about the nature of the court order. Apple can comply exactly with the words of an order but fail to meet its spirit. This is indeed exactly what happened:
Apple were ordered to place a revised notice exactly as a result of adding their material to the original, resulting in the 'meaning and intention' of the original order becoming unclear.
You can fight the facts all you like, but you've already abandoned some of your arguments and are now falling back on insulting my country's legal system, a system which literally provides the foundation for yours. Please don't be so ridiculously obtuse. The links I provided give excellent detail on exactly what happened and why.
Yes, the LG Prada, you bloody retard.
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
You people still believe this! We have to laugh because otherwise we’d burst into tears.
Apple. Did. Exactly. What. The. Court. Stated. No one can read what was posted and fail to comprehend that they lost to Samsung in the UK. You cannot possibly state otherwise.
They have no jurisdiction over any order but their own. Apple can post whatever it wants about any other order they received. You fail to comprehend this.
Sure thing. That’s what’s happening.
Oh boy, here we go.
If Apple wants to get rid of competition they should just release iPhone 4c at 99$..and game over for Samscum (a company that kills people, cheats, lies and makes bad products),
This forum pretty much descended into a mean-spirited, elitist, nationalist and racist, we-hate-anything-non-Apple pit.
Youtube sucks! i i tried to post some comments on youtube about samsunk galaxia note 3 and it dint work,
so i'm gonna post it here:
1.
Kuuuks3 days ago
What Is Iphone....lol
Reply
RedeneEyes22 minutes ago
Pure Magic!
2.
RedeneEyes24 minutes ago
Hey Guys! i just want know what happens if you lose the S-Pen can you still call your tablet Samsung Galaxy Note?
3.
Alin Campan1 week ago
Which phone would you recommend Galaxy S4 or this one Note 3
Reply
RedeneEyes17 minutes ago
Neither
4.
russian user week ago
that's why, iphone sucks...
Reply
RedeneEyes20 minutes ago
because it doesnt look like a cheap brick?
5.
Andi Furxhi5 days ago
I'm in love with my Galaxy Note 3
Reply
RedeneEyes18 minutes ago
This why your girlfriend left you
6.
user arab week ago
The best in the world !
Reply
RedeneEyes22 minutes ago
at sucking !
its so easy to make fun of samsung products
No LG were not very successful with the Prada (as you very well know), mostly because they lacked a snake-oil-salesman, a la Steve Jobs.
Successful or not, this does not change the fact that the LG Prada was the first smart phone.
Watch and learn:
The Prada was nowhere near a landmark phone, it's not even an apps phone. The whole smartphone concept was established way before LG with the Palm Treo, Windows Mobile Phones and Noka-Sony-Ericsson Symbian phones.
Yes, the LG Prada, you bloody retard.
Seriously stop smoking weed! affects your brain, iPhone was the first smartphone "the whole planet knows that"
You do know that Samsung no longer sells most if not all the devices an injunction would cover.
Then why aren't you on lgpradainsider.com?
True, but only when it comes to you.
And what about all the Palm, BB, HP, etc smartphones that preceded it?
Tell coke, it isn't 1920. They should stop defending the curvy bottle design.
My oh my the trolls are out in force. What time is it in SK?
Because at that price they'd get rid of themselves as well.
And what about all the Palm, BB, HP, etc smartphones that preceded it?
You know, I had a Windows Mobile smartphone (actually two I think) before the iPhone. God it was awful. I don't really know much about the competitors back then but compared to smartphones of today the WM ones were more proto-smartphones.
The thing is, I don't think there's really a strict line you can draw between these sorts of phones. I can't think of a great way to distinguish where proto becomes real-smartphone.