You would think other companies would take note and try to make better quality products (instead of always aiming for the lowest price). People don't only care about price, it's just one factor.
You would think other companies would take note and try to make better quality products (instead of always aiming for the lowest price). People don't only care about price, it's just one factor.
I think that might be a little simplistic. PC makers do make good quality products, but they also sell the cheap stuff, because there are a lot of people who mainly, or only, buy a PC based on price.
Since its so damn fast n easy for you look up all companies, add all valuations, remove the highest valued companies one by one until the sum of all companies is below 179B or whatever you go do that!
Even then you still won't have the SOURCE of this information, which is what I'm looking for.
You could just go to some place like bloomberg or forbes, pay the money (if its behind a paywall) and get the info... ;-). I'm pretty sure they'll go into great detail.
This really is a bit of an Apples-to-oranges comparison, but those are the numbers.
Interesting and not possible.
It sounds like MS only credits the down payment at time of sale,
with the remainder of the revenue from the usage charge credited elsewhere.
I wonder anyone has done a list of the best #2's in history. Be it Darth Vader to Emperor Palpatine or Commander Riker to Jean Luc Piccard, who would be the coolest #2 character?
Drat! I knew I should have picked up some more shares when they were below $110. Oh well, maybe they'll slide/be pushed down near the end of the next quarter. With how wrong the analysts were, there has to be manipulation going on. They can't all be that stupid - can they?
Note the large payload fairing at the top of the rocket in each photo, instead of the comparatively slim Apollo command/service module and abort system rocket tower. Nothing else was ever launched on a Saturn V with that fairing.
"Ludicrous" isn't really the right word for the headline, though. It implies foolishness or amusing ridiculousness.
Perhaps there was some confusion with the word "luchre"?
What's wrong with that?
It is amusingly ridiculous! I like words being used against their normal usage. It's amazing how many words can be used to mean the opposite of their standard interpretation.
Great results - let's just hope that Apple doesn't become a one-trick pony: almost 65% of revenues coming from the iPhone only is, in my view, a worrying sign.
There he is!
I only hope his voice reaches the ear of Tim Cook, or Apple will surely fall, like all great empires.
How could you not root for Nola? She's freaking HOT
1) But Clay Burton is such a great henchman.
2a) The series Odette's are for short spurts or soon being canceled, like the last season of House MD or that short-lived sitcom with Christian Slater running a computer security firm
2b) I found it interesting that she changed her surname when she got married despite already having a name for herself in Hollywood. I find that to be an attractive quality, but I'm not sure why. My best guess is an inherent insecurity in me and/or programmed (either nature or nurture) for the woman to adopt the man's last name.
All women should adopt their husband's surname. Nothing to do with male dominance, but the integrity of the family name.
Drat! I knew I should have picked up some more shares when they were below $110. Oh well, maybe they'll slide/be pushed down near the end of the next quarter. With how wrong the analysts were, there has to be manipulation going on. They can't all be that stupid - can they?
If you're patient enough, they'll probably collapse in the next recession, which I reckon is due in 2015 or 2016.
All women should adopt their husband's surname. Nothing to do with male dominance, but the integrity of the family name.
Since the only once can know at birth is whether the came from a particular mother, not a father, then why not have the name of all children, and therefore all men who marry women, take the women's name to preserve the integrity of the family name? Oh, that's right. The church sees women as inferior objects whose only purpose is to serve the literal man's wishes. The whole came from Adam's rib, and all. :rolleyes:
All women should adopt their husband's surname. Nothing to do with male dominance, but the integrity of the family name.
Since the only once can know at birth is whether the came from a particular mother, not a father, then why not have the name of all children, and therefore all men who marry women, take the women's name to preserve the integrity of the family name? Oh, that's right. The church sees women as inferior objects whose only purpose is to serve the literal man's wishes. The whole came from Adam's rib, and all. :rolleyes:
I think you're making a bone of contention out of nothing.
Comments
You would think other companies would take note and try to make better quality products (instead of always aiming for the lowest price). People don't only care about price, it's just one factor.
You would think other companies would take note and try to make better quality products (instead of always aiming for the lowest price). People don't only care about price, it's just one factor.
I think that might be a little simplistic. PC makers do make good quality products, but they also sell the cheap stuff, because there are a lot of people who mainly, or only, buy a PC based on price.
Awesome!
Since its so damn fast n easy for you look up all companies, add all valuations, remove the highest valued companies one by one until the sum of all companies is below 179B or whatever you go do that!
Even then you still won't have the SOURCE of this information, which is what I'm looking for.
You could just go to some place like bloomberg or forbes, pay the money (if its behind a paywall) and get the info... ;-). I'm pretty sure they'll go into great detail.
Interesting and not possible.
It sounds like MS only credits the down payment at time of sale,
with the remainder of the revenue from the usage charge credited elsewhere.
Kato, or Minute Mouse
Drat! I knew I should have picked up some more shares when they were below $110. Oh well, maybe they'll slide/be pushed down near the end of the next quarter. With how wrong the analysts were, there has to be manipulation going on. They can't all be that stupid - can they?
Note the large payload fairing at the top of the rocket in each photo, instead of the comparatively slim Apollo command/service module and abort system rocket tower. Nothing else was ever launched on a Saturn V with that fairing.
So depressing.
In case others were wondering about the show I mentioned to [@]dasanman69[/@], here are a couple of their fight scenes and the Wikipage of the show.
Warning: Very Graphic Fight Scenes
- Protagonist v MMA Figher —
- Protagonist v Prison Thug —
Warning: Very Graphic Fight ScenesDamn I forgot how graphic the fight with the albino was.
I think we are witnessing that now... This is their deer-in-headlights poker face.
What's wrong with that?
It is amusingly ridiculous! I like words being used against their normal usage. It's amazing how many words can be used to mean the opposite of their standard interpretation.
What about it? Does it offend you?
God forbid.
Leave the moonshots to Google.
I only hope his voice reaches the ear of Tim Cook, or Apple will surely fall, like all great empires.
All women should adopt their husband's surname. Nothing to do with male dominance, but the integrity of the family name.
Agreed.
And using Define on iOS is one of its best features, in my opinion.
If you're patient enough, they'll probably collapse in the next recession, which I reckon is due in 2015 or 2016.
Since the only once can know at birth is whether the came from a particular mother, not a father, then why not have the name of all children, and therefore all men who marry women, take the women's name to preserve the integrity of the family name? Oh, that's right. The church sees women as inferior objects whose only purpose is to serve the literal man's wishes. The whole came from Adam's rib, and all. :rolleyes:
What if her surname has the most integrity?
I think you're making a bone of contention out of nothing.