Apple Stores will cater to Apple Watch Edition buyers with 30 minutes of hands-on time

13567

Comments

  • Reply 41 of 139
    richlrichl Posts: 2,213member
    mstone wrote: »

    Does the Apple store accept AMEX?  What do you know? They Do.

    AMEX has lots of advantages, but most people including the rich have more than one credit card anyway.

    Personally, I don't leave home without it.

    The only place that accepts AMEX is my car's windscreen on a frosty day. ;)

    In all seriousness, the BA Avios AMEX card is great value and it's only really restaurants that don't take it.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 42 of 139
    magman1979magman1979 Posts: 1,301member
    cali wrote: »
    400

    Is he trolling or is he just that stupid?
    He's just that stupid...
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 43 of 139
    slurpyslurpy Posts: 5,398member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by brlawyer View Post





    I love Apple IIs/Macs and have only used them for 25 years now - I also like my iPhone/iPad a lot, as they are the best phones/tablets in the world - finally, I have converted more than 25 people to Macs (and counting)...probably a LOT more than some of the rabid newbies here, and all that without even caring to own a single Apple share.



    That doesn't mean I need to agree with everything Apple does, and particularly not under Cook's uninspired watch (no pun intended).

     

    Oh, do shutup. Your "I have loved Apple since the stone-age" trash and pathetic "I don't need to agree with everything Apple does" garbage does not fly when ANYONE here can look through your post history to see 99.9% of it is rabid, negative comments regarding pretty much every single hardware and software product Apple makes, let alone your vitriolic hatred towards Tim Cook. As for how much you "love" your iPhone/iPad, your response to the last quarter sales of your favorite device was that those numbers were a "worrying sign", you've bashed the iPad consistently, and you have not ONCE given Tim Cook a shred of credit for being in charge of the company releasing products you supposedly "like" for the past 4 years. Noone gives a shit about how much you love something released in 1977 (Apple II).

     

    You say you're a "lawyer"? I don't know any lawyers that have such time and energy to spend bashing a company online in such a pathetic, childish manner. 

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 44 of 139
    magman1979magman1979 Posts: 1,301member
    brlawyer wrote: »
    I love Apple IIs/Macs and have only used them for 25 years now - I also like my iPhone/iPad a lot, as they are the best phones/tablets in the world - finally, I have converted more than 25 people to Macs (and counting)...probably a LOT more than some of the rabid newbies here, and all that without even caring to own a single Apple share.

    That doesn't mean I need to agree with everything Apple does, and particularly not under Cook's uninspired watch (no pun intended).

    Holy ****, I cannot begin to get over your sheer ignorance and stupidity! Under Tim Cook, Apple has had better products, never been more prosperous, more involved in the environment, doubling-down on customer privacy, and and you have the balls to sit there and type that shit?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 45 of 139
    slurpyslurpy Posts: 5,398member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by MagMan1979 View Post





    Holy ****, I cannot begin to get over your sheer ignorance and stupidity! Under Tim Cook, Apple has had better products, never been more prosperous, more involved in the environment, doubling-down on customer privacy, and and you have the balls to sit there and type that shit?

     

    He lies through this teeth in everything he says. He claims he likes his iPhone/iPad, yet those of us who have been here long enough remember that he has bashed all recent versions of these products- iPhone 6, 5S, iPad Air2, Air, etc and has called them all "toys" hundreds of times. He also claims he's a shareholder, but does nothing but spit venom at Tim Cook, an extremely odd phenomena considering how much $$ Cook has made him if thats actually the case. For someone who "likes Apple" so much as he claims, it's certainly impossible to find any evidence of it from his posts- I have yet to see him offer real praise about anything, besides the boiler-plate "but I love Apple!" response whenever he is called out on his trolling. 

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 46 of 139
    brlawyer wrote: »
    Don't take my 300-minute remark literally, please - my point is that for such a price a LOT more should be provided in terms of "elite" service.

    LOL. That bicycle doesn't go backwards if you back pedal. ;)

    The wealthy pay for quality, not quantity.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 47 of 139
    nolamacguynolamacguy Posts: 4,758member
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by brlawyer View Post



    That doesn't mean I need to agree with everything Apple does, and particularly not under Cook's uninspired watch (no pun intended).

     

    yeah, he only raised their profitability to the highest in apple's history and grew them to the biggest tech firm in history, all while being an openly gay CEO. totally uninspiring....

     

    please. link us to your company's profile page or LinkedIn resume, please -- dying to see how you do it.

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 48 of 139
    nolamacguynolamacguy Posts: 4,758member
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Slurpy View Post

     

    Again, your hand-wringing and concern about the treatment Apple Watch Edition buyers receive, while you simultaneously shit on the product, is hilarious. In any sane forum you'd be instantly banned for such flagrant intellectual dishonesty and fake concern. The fact you use words such as "crapwatch" and act offended about "no-criticism" members, as if you're actually making a thoughtful, reasoned critique, is also astounding. 


     

    agreed -- this guy is FOS.

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 49 of 139
    brlawyer wrote: »
    The fact that you take my comment literally shows how childishly some "no-criticism" members behave around here...besides, I assure you that the "filthy rich" do not buy mass-marketed products like an Apple Edition Crapwatch to show off...in fact, you won't ever see them around popular stores like Apple's.

    The only childish behavior I see is name calling like "Crapwatch."

    I saw a tanned, well-dressed person park his white Mercedes SLS AMG gull-wing sports car in front of the Apple Store at The Domain in North Austin, and walk in. I assume you know what the SLS AMG is. So much for your sweeping generalizations about "won't ever see them around popular stores like Apple's."
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 50 of 139
    brlawyerbrlawyer Posts: 828member
    magman1979 wrote: »
    He's just that stupid...

    Personal offense is THE reason for banning - now why aren't you, "Slurpy" and others out already?

    Divergence of views is one thing; calling others "stupid", "chimpanzee" or similar low-level nonsense is another.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 51 of 139
    brlawyer wrote: »
    AMEX is one of the least accepted cards in the world - most people, rich or otherwise, have MCs and Visas instead.

    Like I said, it takes one to know one, and once again, you demonstrate that you know nothing about the filthy rich.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 52 of 139
    brlawyerbrlawyer Posts: 828member
    slurpy wrote: »
    He lies through this teeth in everything he says. He claims he likes his iPhone/iPad, yet those of us who have been here long enough remember that he has bashed all recent versions of these products- iPhone 6, 5S, iPad Air2, Air, etc and has called them all "toys" hundreds of times. He also claims he's a shareholder, but does nothing but spit venom at Tim Cook, an extremely odd phenomena considering how much $$ Cook has made him if thats actually the case. For someone who "likes Apple" so much as he claims, it's certainly impossible to find any evidence of it from his posts. 

    I've never claimed to be a shareholder - show me a single post where I state that.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 53 of 139
    magman1979magman1979 Posts: 1,301member
    brlawyer wrote: »
    Personal offense is THE reason for banning - now why aren't you, "Slurpy" and others out already?

    Divergence of views is one thing; calling others "stupid", "chimpanzee" or similar low-level nonsense is another.
    Pot, meet Kettle. Looks who's freaking talking... How many times have you berated users in this forum with your general, wide-reaching insults, even within this very discussion?

    Your comments are sheer stupidity, and MANY here agree, and each of your responses just digs you a deeper hole. So by all means, keep commenting, your lack of intelligence in the discussions you're partaking in make for some quality entertainment.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 54 of 139
    brlawyerbrlawyer Posts: 828member
    The only childish behavior I see is name calling like "Crapwatch."

    I saw a tanned, well-dressed person park his white Mercedes SLS AMG gull-wing sports car in front of the Apple Store at The Domain in North Austin, and walk in. I assume you know what the SLS AMG is. So much for your sweeping generalizations about "won't ever see them around popular stores like Apple's."

    The filthy rich buy Audemars Piguet and above for watches, not Apple.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 55 of 139
    brlawyerbrlawyer Posts: 828member
    magman1979 wrote: »
    Pot, meet Kettle. Looks who's freaking talking... How many times have you berated users in this forum with your general, wide-reaching insults, even within this very discussion?

    Your comments are sheer stupidity, and MANY here agree, and each of your responses just digs you a deeper hole. So by all means, keep commenting, your lack of intelligence in the discussions you're partaking in make for some quality entertainment.

    I've never, ever personally/directly offended others here, unless in defense against idiotic/asinine comments like yours; so not pot/kettle situation here, sorry.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 56 of 139
    slurpyslurpy Posts: 5,398member
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by NolaMacGuy View Post

     

     

    agreed -- this guy is FOS.


     

    It's analogous to calling someone my "best friend", yet my communication with them involves only incessant insulting, attacking, and mocking. 

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 57 of 139

    Yet another odd mis-step by Apple.

     

    Regardless of whether 15 or 30 minutes is better, why have any time limit in the first place? The very idea is off-putting even before stepping in the store. I have bought jewellery before (not for me), and I sat down in a comfortable, small shop, offered several cocktails, with no one there but me and several staff, and was able to peruse jewellery brought to me at leisure. If I had thought that I had an arbitrary time limit, I would have gone elsewhere. 

     

    As Apple are selling this as a fashion item, they need to adopt the same approach. It is as though they are caught between a rock and a hard place: on one hand, they want to sell tons of them, much like the iDevices, so they are worried about too many people gumming up the works for others. On the other hand, they want to give it an air of exclusivity and luxury, in order to compete with other fashion accessories. These two things don't mix, though. Either they offer a service that competes with similar retail experiences, and accept relatively tiny sales, or they don't, in order to increase sales. But in this case, I see them selling very few Edition Watches, because they won't have offered a commensurate experience. However, this may be where non-Apple retail outlets come to their aid.

     

    My feeling is that they shouldn’t try selling any Edition Watches in Apple retail stores, because it just isn't the right experience or anywhere close to it. In addition, they should scrap any time limits, as I don't think they'll be necessary, and all they do is cause further resentment of Apple.

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 58 of 139
    mstonemstone Posts: 11,510member
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Benjamin Frost View Post

     

     But in this case, I see them selling very few Edition Watches, because they won't have offered a commensurate experience.


    Every Edition watch they can make will likely be sold as soon as it comes off the assembly line. They will be difficult to acquire and people will be settling not selecting. 

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 59 of 139
    mike1 wrote: »
    I wish they would make it easier to buy accessories, gift cards etc. Hate waiting for help to buy something off the shelf.
    They really need a standard checkout line for that stuff. Especially during peak times and the holidays.

    There's an app for that! If you're buying something off the shelf just use the "Apple Store" app. It's 100% self-checkout. You literally do NOT have to get approval or speak with any employee. I can make an accessory purchase in under a minute with the app. Though it's a strange sensation when you exit the Apple Store with no bag for your purchase and no hard copy of the receipt. The first time I used the app I felt obliged to show the greeter at the front door that I am not stealing the merchandise. It still feels strange every time.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 60 of 139
    mac_128 wrote: »
    I wonder what the restock fee would be if it's returned?

    Probably 15% in shame for wasting that much money on a watch that needs to be recharged daily
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.