FBI investigation of Minn. mall mass stabbing may rekindle iPhone encryption debate
The FBI has the phone of Minnesota alleged terrorist and mass-stabbing perpetrator Dahir Adan, and is investigating how to gain access to the data contained within.
"Dahir Adan's iPhone is locked," FBI special agent Rich Thornton said in a statement. "We are in the process of assessing our legal and technical options to gain access to this device and the data it may contain." As of yet, the FBI has not declared what model iPhone it is, nor what version of iOS is running on the device.
Dahir Adan stabbed 10 people in the Crossroad Center mall in St. Cloud, Minn. on Sept. 17. The FBI claims that Adan "may have been radicalized" in the days leading up to the attack, but the exact vector of the "almost overnight" transformation is not clear, according to Thornton.
The spree was stopped by an off-duty police officer, who confronted and ultimately shot Adan.
Adan's family, and people who knew him, claimed that Adan may have been provoked in the mall before the incident according to the local Star Tribune, but the investigation to this point has identified a pattern, and a plan leading up to to the attack.
International radical groups are claiming responsibility for Adan's actions, but if they actually have direct involvement in Adan's behavior is not known. The FBI wants access to the phone to help determine what, if any, influence the groups may have applied to Adan prior to the attack.
Even though large metropolitan areas like New York City have hundreds of seized iPhones that they want the information extracted from with the number growing every day, Apple has so far prevailed in its efforts to prevent the courts from mandating the construction of a "master key" to allow unfettered access to an iOS device by court order. However, all of the combined factors in Adan's attack and investigation may lead to another high profile potential legal approach to force Apple to make the tool.
On Dec. 2, 2015, 14 people were killed and 22 were seriously injured by a mass shooting by Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik in San Bernardino California. The pair were ultimately shot by law enforcement after a four-hour chase.
Discovered amongst their possessions was a county-owned iPhone 5c. In a botched attempt to penetrate the phone, the county ordered a password reset on the device, preventing any data more recent than Oct. 19 from being automatically backed up to iCloud, and accessible to subpoena.
The Department of Justice said that they already had all the call logs for the device up to the date of the attack, as well as data backups from before the last connection of the phone to Apple's servers.
The judge overseeing the case dictated that Apple create a tool that would work with the seized iPhone 5c that would allow the government to unlock the phone, and grant access to the full contents and data store in the device's flash storage.
Apple CEO Tim Cook refused the request. The FBI ultimately purchased the services of a "grey hat" hacking company to penetrate the phone just hours before a court hearing about the subject, and no tangible data directly related to the shooting was ultimately found.
The FBI has refused requests for information regarding the iPhone 5c in the past, citing that since it does not own the hack, it can't talk about it. Apple has also said that they have no intention of filing suit for data about the penetration method, but a series of journalists have filed suit under the Freedom of Information Act to get this information.
As of yet, the FBI has not filed any legal request to demand Apple unlock Adan's phone.
"Dahir Adan's iPhone is locked," FBI special agent Rich Thornton said in a statement. "We are in the process of assessing our legal and technical options to gain access to this device and the data it may contain." As of yet, the FBI has not declared what model iPhone it is, nor what version of iOS is running on the device.
Dahir Adan stabbed 10 people in the Crossroad Center mall in St. Cloud, Minn. on Sept. 17. The FBI claims that Adan "may have been radicalized" in the days leading up to the attack, but the exact vector of the "almost overnight" transformation is not clear, according to Thornton.
The spree was stopped by an off-duty police officer, who confronted and ultimately shot Adan.
Adan's family, and people who knew him, claimed that Adan may have been provoked in the mall before the incident according to the local Star Tribune, but the investigation to this point has identified a pattern, and a plan leading up to to the attack.
International radical groups are claiming responsibility for Adan's actions, but if they actually have direct involvement in Adan's behavior is not known. The FBI wants access to the phone to help determine what, if any, influence the groups may have applied to Adan prior to the attack.
Even though large metropolitan areas like New York City have hundreds of seized iPhones that they want the information extracted from with the number growing every day, Apple has so far prevailed in its efforts to prevent the courts from mandating the construction of a "master key" to allow unfettered access to an iOS device by court order. However, all of the combined factors in Adan's attack and investigation may lead to another high profile potential legal approach to force Apple to make the tool.
Terrorism investigation as a platform for a legal assault
On Dec. 2, 2015, 14 people were killed and 22 were seriously injured by a mass shooting by Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik in San Bernardino California. The pair were ultimately shot by law enforcement after a four-hour chase.
Discovered amongst their possessions was a county-owned iPhone 5c. In a botched attempt to penetrate the phone, the county ordered a password reset on the device, preventing any data more recent than Oct. 19 from being automatically backed up to iCloud, and accessible to subpoena.
The Department of Justice said that they already had all the call logs for the device up to the date of the attack, as well as data backups from before the last connection of the phone to Apple's servers.
The judge overseeing the case dictated that Apple create a tool that would work with the seized iPhone 5c that would allow the government to unlock the phone, and grant access to the full contents and data store in the device's flash storage.
Apple CEO Tim Cook refused the request. The FBI ultimately purchased the services of a "grey hat" hacking company to penetrate the phone just hours before a court hearing about the subject, and no tangible data directly related to the shooting was ultimately found.
The FBI has refused requests for information regarding the iPhone 5c in the past, citing that since it does not own the hack, it can't talk about it. Apple has also said that they have no intention of filing suit for data about the penetration method, but a series of journalists have filed suit under the Freedom of Information Act to get this information.
As of yet, the FBI has not filed any legal request to demand Apple unlock Adan's phone.
Comments
Do kids these days not read 1984 by George Orwell?
Lets stop calling every criminal terroris, because "Terrorist" has become a magic word that means "the constitution and the laws of the land don't apply, therefore we can operate as if we are a fascist state".
Before long they will be calling drug dealers "terrorists" and even drug users. Then hackers.
Then anyone who doesn't vote for a democrat.
Then they won't need to because we will all be in camps.
IF you think this is hyperbole, you don't know history. It has happened dozens of times in the past century.
The USA is a civilized country, the USA police officers are not trigger happy, and you don't appear to have the first clue what you're talking about.
I think Rene had a valid point but it came across a bit snobbish. Our law enforcement does tend to shoot to kill perhaps more often than necessary. This guy had a knife. Why couldn't he be taken down by means other than deadly force? We are so afraid of terroism that shoot to kill is the way we handle these situations. If the suspect were taken alive we would be able to learn so much more than anything on their iPhone.
Europe is full of cowardly cowards, who welcome and import barbarism, who constantly make excuses for terrorists and it's probably only a matter of days before the next terrorist kills a bunch Europeans for fun.
Good luck incapacitating the next terrorist shooting scores of people or running them down with large trucks, or stabbing them, or blowing them up.
All happening in places that are mostly gun free, so Europeans can't even defend themselves, even though they are basically at war and under attack. What a bunch of naive and cowardly dopes.
Now here's a statement from a highly civilized American, and a highly intelligent one as well, as he himself will tell you.
A lot of us Americans also wonder about that trigger-happy question. This story about a guy with a penknife shot by a Seattle cop was on NPR this morning:
http://www.npr.org/2016/10/07/496867205/years-after-police-shooting-woodcarvers-brother-remembers-the-man-he-lost
There's some damning audio from the dashcam, if you listen to the story.
Everything you've learned from watching TV is wrong. Seriously.
The reality is that the off duty police man had to shoot the dirtbag terrorist multiple times, yet the animal kept charging, so thankfully, the off duty policeman did what they had to do and eliminated the immediate threat. At that point, multiple people had already been stabbed by the terrorist lowlife.
Had this been in 'civilized' Europe, a whole lot more than 10 people would have been stabbed. We'd probably be reading about 50 people stabbed, because there wouldn't have been any citizens carrying a firearm, which could have neutralized the threat. Allowing 50 people to get stabbed and allowing multiple dead innocents doesn't sound very civilized to me. It sounds downright cowardly, disgusting, offensive and quite stupid. It actually sounds quite barbaric, but I expect not much more from that miserable lot of appeasing little, sniveling monkeys. No offense meant to any real primates of course.
As far as the topic of the post is concerned, about the only information of value they could possibly get off the phone is whether this terrorism communicated with another domestic terrorist. If he communicated with overseas terrorists, what would the FBI do with information anyway? There's nothing they could do.