Apple opens up HomeKit development with software authentication & looser licensing

2»

Comments

  • Reply 21 of 27
    shapetablesshapetables Posts: 201member
    Support has however lagged behind Amazon's Echo speakers, which have looser encryption and certification standards for developers. 
    ", that, until now, were easier for developers and makers to work with than the HomeKit platform due to Apple's tighter administrative controls and high licensing fees." @sergioz @rayz2016 @ireland @williamh @macapfel @jsh56 @robbm ; :s

    This is a really great announcement, especially combined with CoreML/Metal2!

    edited June 2017
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 22 of 27
    vmarksvmarks Posts: 762editor
    ireland said:
    HomeKit ecosystem of available products lacking in this part of the world compared to the US. I also dislike how Phillips have (as far as the average consumer is concerned) currently a near monopoly on the HomeKit lightning market with so-called “starter kits” consisting of three bulbs and an unwanted customer lock-in hub for €200. WTF!? I can get three regular LED bulbs for €15. So sick of these companies ripping us off. I got to believe this is largely due to Apple making the HomeKit development process so completely onerous. Hopefully, for the consumer’s sake some of these new policies help to democratize the HomeKit lighting market.
    The bulbs are zwave. The unwanted hub is required to convert ethernet to zwave so the bulbs can be on the network. The hub also has the secure chip that handles the encryption homekit requires. If you want to do away with the hub, you can put bluetooth in each bulb and then use a bluetooth to wifi hub (darn hubs again), or put wifi in each bulb and put the security chip in each bulb, which makes every bulb cost more.

    The bulbs are zwave, not plain LED. You can get cheaper zwave bulbs, but still need a way for ethernet and wifi devices to talk to them. Philips use the hub for every home automation system they work with, not just HomeKit. This isn't on Apple, it's on Philips. Lifx don't use a hub at all - but they're expensive because each one has wifi built in. 
    cornchip
     0Likes 0Dislikes 1Informative
  • Reply 23 of 27
    vmarksvmarks Posts: 762editor
    Can't wait until they provide support for Honeywell products.
    I have a HomeKit enabled Honeywell thermostat.
    Can't wait until they provide support for Honeywell products.
    Honeywell Lyric has had HomeKit for some time now.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 24 of 27
    evilutionevilution Posts: 1,399member
    williamh said:
    sergioz said:
    "looser encryption" is that a new "technical" term? 
    I didn't see that term in the article.  What I saw was looser licensing.  
    Looser encryption was used to describe the Amazon Echo.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 25 of 27
    vmarks said:
    Can't wait until they provide support for Honeywell products.
    Honeywell Lyric has had HomeKit for some time now.
    For Honeywell Thermostat yes they do, but not yet for lights and security surveillance.

    But it will be available soon, only a matter of time.

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 26 of 27
    BMPVisualbmpvisual Posts: 1unconfirmed, member
    jsh56 said:
    No such word as "looser".  Proper use is "more loose".

    More so, the writer is a loser at grammar.

    loose
    lo͞os/
    adjective
    comparative adjective: looser 



     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.