Apple's heads-up display tech for self-driving cars uses AR to enhance driver safety

Posted:
in General Discussion edited April 2018
Apple's work on augmented reality could find a place in its ongoing automotive initiative, with the company considering ways to use AR to show information about the road ahead, including things that are out of the driver's vision.




Joining together two fields of interest to Apple, the patent application for an "Adaptive vehicle augmented reality display using stereographic imagery" details an AR system that can use a pre-generated 3D model of the world in improving how it generates 3D content for its users. While this could be applied in many different ways, Apple suggests this interpretation could be used to provide users with even more information about the world around them, while on the move.

The pre-generated 3D model could include data about road routes, points of interest, and other areas useful to drivers, which could be held remotely in cloud storage. This data is collected together into smaller chunks, like 3D versions of tiles used by online mapping services, and relevant sections of the 3D model are provided to the car's AR system.

Apple suggests the onboard AR system could combine the pre-made 3D tile with data from its own sources, such as LIDAR sensors of a self-driving car, in making decisions of what information to provide to the driver and passengers. This data is then presented to the driver, with one example presented as data projected onto the vehicle's windscreen.

Crucially, this extra downloaded data would provide information about areas far beyond the range of the car's sensor arrays and the driver's own vision. This can allow for data that isn't immediately visible to be included in the displayed image, such as showing the path ahead in an AR view, including parts of the road obscured by buildings or hills in the distance.

If another nearby vehicle turns away and drives out of immediate view, like around a building, the downloaded data tile could tell the AR system of that road, and overlay a virtual car graphic on the display that shows where the vehicle could have travelled.




This view could also help in cases where visibility is poor, like fog or heavy snow, where the car's sensors may also struggle to create an accurate picture of the immediate area outside. The pre-existing cloud data could help give what would be an expected route and important notifications that the sensors are unable to create for themselves, in an emergency.

Being able to augment a self-driving car or driver assist system with extra data for the road ahead potentially makes these systems more useful and safer. Giving a self-driving car more data potentially means it will be more capable of planning maneuvers it may need to perform in the coming miles, with the advanced warning providing more time for processing these types of decisions.

Apple has a major interest in self-driving cars, with the company operating 45 vehicles in tests in California. Covered with an array of LIDAR and other sensors to monitor its surroundings while on the move, the cars are acknowledged to be part of self-driving system trials, though the ultimate aim of the technology is unknown.

Current speculation points to a possible self-driving platform for ridehailing services to use, most likely in partnership with third-party firms supplying the vehicles. There are also the long-standing rumors surrounding "Project Titan," thought to involve the creation of its own electric vehicles.

Regardless of Apple's plans, earlier patent applications certainly indicate it is still coming up with ideas relating to self-driving cars. In March, patent applications were found concerning gesture recognition in vehicles, a communication system between self-driving cars and other manually-driven vehicles, and understanding the gestures of police officers controlling traffic on roads.
«13

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 51
    SoliSoli Posts: 10,035member
    Heads up displays are where I've always thought Apple's AR effort would be the most useful impact, but when can we expect Project Titan to ever get a public announcement and demonstration?
    longpathcgWerks
  • Reply 2 of 51
    Yes. And it will be so smart that it will require WiFi to activate and login to iCloud. Forget about using this in remote places. New policy.
  • Reply 3 of 51
    coolfactorcoolfactor Posts: 2,243member
    Soli said:
    Heads up displays are where I've always thought Apple's AR effort would be the most useful impact, but when can we expect Project Titan to ever get a public announcement and demonstration?
    And all those that complain about FaceID and the TrueDepth camera aren't seeing this side of it.
    lkruppmwhite
  • Reply 4 of 51
    lkrupplkrupp Posts: 10,557member
    Yes. And it will be so smart that it will require WiFi to activate and login to iCloud. Forget about using this in remote places. New policy.
    Yeah, well you won’t find EV charging stations in remote places either so what’s your point? Just out for a little troll?
    longpathStrangeDaysradarthekatmwhiteboxcatchermacgui
  • Reply 5 of 51
    lkrupplkrupp Posts: 10,557member
    Soli said:
    Heads up displays are where I've always thought Apple's AR effort would be the most useful impact, but when can we expect Project Titan to ever get a public announcement and demonstration?
    And all those that complain about FaceID and the TrueDepth camera aren't seeing this side of it.
    Another case of Apple skating to where the puck will be instead of where it is.
    longpathStrangeDaysradarthekatgregg thurmanmwhiteRayz2016
  • Reply 6 of 51
    dysamoriadysamoria Posts: 3,430member
    Right, so we can have distractions on our windshields. I can imagine the software bugs now... "Why won't that indicator go away??"

    Then the other companies will make their own and they'll have ads...
    cgWerksireland
  • Reply 7 of 51
    longpathlongpath Posts: 393member
    I’d love to see some of these features in something along the lines of CarPlay2. The reality is that some people regard driving as a chore while others, like myself, regard it as a preferred pastime. For those who regard driving as a chore, I see self driving cars as a welcome boon; but for those of us that relish our time behind the wheel, technologies such as AR still have potential by providing drivers with providing over the horizon information, and other otherwise low observable information beforehand, instead of forcing the driver to respond rapidly to new data that comes up all at once, reducing driver peak workload.
    GG1
  • Reply 9 of 51
    gatorguygatorguy Posts: 24,213member
    longpath said:
    I’d love to see some of these features in something along the lines of CarPlay2. The reality is that some people regard driving as a chore while others, like myself, regard it as a preferred pastime. For those who regard driving as a chore, I see self driving cars as a welcome boon; but for those of us that relish our time behind the wheel, technologies such as AR still have potential by providing drivers with providing over the horizon information, and other otherwise low observable information beforehand, instead of forcing the driver to respond rapidly to new data that comes up all at once, reducing driver peak workload.
    Your aftermarket suggestion on the way from companies like Navdy
    https://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-drive/culture/technology/augmented-reality-merges-into-vehiclewindshields/article35096455/
  • Reply 10 of 51
    robin huberrobin huber Posts: 3,959member
    dysamoria said:
    Right, so we can have distractions on our windshields. I can imagine the software bugs now... "Why won't that indicator go away??"

    Then the other companies will make their own and they'll have ads...
    Windshields? We don’t need no stinkin’ Windshields! Just chill in your mobile pod surrounded by displays. It’s the Apple way. 
    radarthekat
  • Reply 11 of 51
    roakeroake Posts: 811member
    That’s awesome!  I like it!

    I wonder how companies such as Garmin have been affected by everyone having GPS on their phone, in modern cars, and now possible integration into the car windshields.
  • Reply 12 of 51
    SpamSandwichSpamSandwich Posts: 33,407member
    The entire driving experience is going to radically change in the next 3-5 years.
    radarthekat
  • Reply 13 of 51
    fastasleepfastasleep Posts: 6,417member
    dysamoria said:
    Right, so we can have distractions on our windshields. 
    How is it a distraction if the car is driving itself?
  • Reply 14 of 51
    mike fixmike fix Posts: 270member
    Just think of all that advertising revue!  
  • Reply 15 of 51
    tallest skiltallest skil Posts: 43,388member
    I LOVE the idea of AR in a car. Absolutely love it. Project your GPS directions directly into your field of vision. No need to look down. Paint yellow the lane you’re supposed to be in, and also know exactly when to merge or change lanes based on real-time observation of cars around you. 
    radarthekatcgWerksSpamSandwich
  • Reply 16 of 51
    SoliSoli Posts: 10,035member
    I LOVE the idea of AR in a car. Absolutely love it. Project your GPS directions directly into your field of vision. No need to look down. Paint yellow the lane you’re supposed to be in, and also know exactly when to merge or change lanes based on real-time observation of cars around you. 
    Lidar and other sensors will be able to let you know about objects that human eye possible see, plus with all the Face ID tech they will be able to have a drive-facing camera that will make sure the driver is reasonably situationally aware.
    radarthekatcgWerks
  • Reply 17 of 51
    radarthekatradarthekat Posts: 3,842moderator
    longpath said:
    I’d love to see some of these features in something along the lines of CarPlay2. The reality is that some people regard driving as a chore while others, like myself, regard it as a preferred pastime. For those who regard driving as a chore, I see self driving cars as a welcome boon; but for those of us that relish our time behind the wheel, technologies such as AR still have potential by providing drivers with providing over the horizon information, and other otherwise low observable information beforehand, instead of forcing the driver to respond rapidly to new data that comes up all at once, reducing driver peak workload.
    Just glad I’m not yet hearing anything about self-driving motorcycles.  Where would the fun be in that.  A bike is all the wheels I own, all I ride, since moving to the Philippines 18 months ago.  I’m in favor of the self-driving future, but also happy there likely won’t be many self-driving vehicles on the roads here for quite some time.  Traffic is chaos here, courteous chaos, but chaos nonetheless.  And I love it; keeps me sharp and focused. 
  • Reply 18 of 51
    SoliSoli Posts: 10,035member
    longpath said:
    I’d love to see some of these features in something along the lines of CarPlay2. The reality is that some people regard driving as a chore while others, like myself, regard it as a preferred pastime. For those who regard driving as a chore, I see self driving cars as a welcome boon; but for those of us that relish our time behind the wheel, technologies such as AR still have potential by providing drivers with providing over the horizon information, and other otherwise low observable information beforehand, instead of forcing the driver to respond rapidly to new data that comes up all at once, reducing driver peak workload.
    Just glad I’m not yet hearing anything about self-driving motorcycles.  Where would the fun be in that.  A bike is all the wheels I own, all I ride, since moving to the Philippines 18 months ago.  I’m in favor of the self-driving future, but also happy there likely won’t be many self-driving vehicles on the roads here for quite some time.  Traffic is chaos here, courteous chaos, but chaos nonetheless.  And I love it; keeps me sharp and focused. 
    Maybe not self driving, but I'd figure that computerized gyroscopes could increase safety by not allowing the rider to make certain moves that would result in losing balance as easily.
  • Reply 19 of 51
    lkrupp said:
    Another case of Apple skating to where the puck will be instead of where it is.
    Boy could I have used this in late March 2008. 

    I was was driving a 2005 Ford GT I had purchased in San Diego to my home in Spokane, WA. I had experienced perfect weather all along the way until I got to just north of Moscow, ID on US 95. It was about 6:00 PM and very dark when I found myself in a heavy snow storm. 

    I couldnt see see the road edge and only about 20-30 feet ahead of me. I’m talking about snow blindness. The only directional indication I had was taillights fading in the distance. 

    The storm lasted about 20 minutes when it cleared as fast as it started. Those were the most harrowing 20 minutes I can remember ever having. 

    A system as described would have been a godsend. 
  • Reply 20 of 51
    plovellplovell Posts: 824member
    The current HUD systems have one really problematic "feature" - they do NOT work with polarized sunglasses. These sunglasses always have their polarization set to eliminate glare reflections from the road  (either shine on it or reflection from water). Unfortunately, the HUD system reflects off the inside of the windshield and so if filtered out too.

    I'd love to have a solution but for the moment I've switched mine off (the sunglasses are prescription and I don't have non-polarized ones).

    Bummer.
    dysamoria
Sign In or Register to comment.