Apple's AirPods fail to earn Consumer Reports recommendation, beaten by Samsung's Galaxy B...
In its latest head-to-head headphone review, Consumer Reports pitted Apple's AirPods against Samsung's Galaxy Buds to find the cheaper Samsung model sounds better, lasts longer and is an all-around top performer.
The comparison, published on Tuesday, reached many of the same conclusions as AppleInsider's Galaxy Buds review from March, albeit applied to the -- slightly -- tweaked second-generation AirPods.
In short, Samsung's entry into the "smart earbud" category beats Apple's wireless headphones in the sound department, battery life, control options and, for Samsung smartphone owners, ease-of-use. Galaxy Buds also apes niceties pioneered by Apple, including an open-to-pair case mechanism compatible with certain Galaxy phone models.
Just as AirPods revert to limited functionality when paired to an Android device, Samsung's buds don't play nice with iPhone. That said, Consumer Reports believes the Samsung model is more functional on iOS than AirPods are when paired to an Android device.
Curiously, the report goes one step beyond crowning Samsung a victory, and denies AirPods a coveted "recommended" rating. According to Consumer Reports' Thomas Germain, Apple's product "didn't score well enough" in the publication's tests to warrant a recommendation, despite plaudits for iOS integration and a streamlined user experience.
Consumer Reports does note AirPods turned in a "decent" performance reproducing music and movies, and will "sound perfectly acceptable" to some users. AirPods' phone call audio and carrying case were also given the thumbs-up.
"The AirPods don't sound terrible -- far from it. But when you listen back-to-back with the Samsung Galaxy Buds, the difference is undeniable. You don't have to be an audio snob to hear it," Germain writes.
Consumer Reports has a somewhat controversial history when it comes to grading Apple's latest releases, with some alleging the publication trades on the tech giant's name to drive readership. In 2016, for example, the reviewers failed to recommend MacBook Pro for the first time, a decision later reversed after discussions with Apple and a software update. A quick dismissal of HomePod in 2018 again stoked claims of bias.
Following the HomePod kerfuffle, AppleInsider was granted an inside look at the publication's facilities and testing methodologies. At the time, Consumer Reports reviewers and editors denied undue prejudice against Apple, saying their results are objective and based entirely on analytical and data-driven methodology.
The comparison, published on Tuesday, reached many of the same conclusions as AppleInsider's Galaxy Buds review from March, albeit applied to the -- slightly -- tweaked second-generation AirPods.
In short, Samsung's entry into the "smart earbud" category beats Apple's wireless headphones in the sound department, battery life, control options and, for Samsung smartphone owners, ease-of-use. Galaxy Buds also apes niceties pioneered by Apple, including an open-to-pair case mechanism compatible with certain Galaxy phone models.
Just as AirPods revert to limited functionality when paired to an Android device, Samsung's buds don't play nice with iPhone. That said, Consumer Reports believes the Samsung model is more functional on iOS than AirPods are when paired to an Android device.
Curiously, the report goes one step beyond crowning Samsung a victory, and denies AirPods a coveted "recommended" rating. According to Consumer Reports' Thomas Germain, Apple's product "didn't score well enough" in the publication's tests to warrant a recommendation, despite plaudits for iOS integration and a streamlined user experience.
Consumer Reports does note AirPods turned in a "decent" performance reproducing music and movies, and will "sound perfectly acceptable" to some users. AirPods' phone call audio and carrying case were also given the thumbs-up.
"The AirPods don't sound terrible -- far from it. But when you listen back-to-back with the Samsung Galaxy Buds, the difference is undeniable. You don't have to be an audio snob to hear it," Germain writes.
Consumer Reports has a somewhat controversial history when it comes to grading Apple's latest releases, with some alleging the publication trades on the tech giant's name to drive readership. In 2016, for example, the reviewers failed to recommend MacBook Pro for the first time, a decision later reversed after discussions with Apple and a software update. A quick dismissal of HomePod in 2018 again stoked claims of bias.
Following the HomePod kerfuffle, AppleInsider was granted an inside look at the publication's facilities and testing methodologies. At the time, Consumer Reports reviewers and editors denied undue prejudice against Apple, saying their results are objective and based entirely on analytical and data-driven methodology.
Comments
I see a few hundred people wearing Airpods a day. Insanely popular. Galaxy Buds? Pretty much zero.
Unlike other things, it's virtually impossible to do a truly blinded test with these, and despite their claims to the contrary, CU does have its biases, just as people on AI tend to.
Second, sound quality is subjective, but okay, Samsung makes good hardware.
Third, if they’re saying the Samsung product serves the Android market better and AirPods serve the iOS market better, what’s the point?
But wouldn’t be without m’Airpods.
The timing of the review and the type of conclusions they choose as relevant are certainly telling me more about Consumer Reports than they are about Apple's product.
It seems they have a history of this. Which raises the question for why anyone could rely on their reviews or pay for a subscription
Apple did it first of course though.
The Sears of periodicals.
I remembered them in the 80’s.
They recommended crap then too.
This is an honest question. Open to pair is nice but do the do the easy switching between devices like AirPods?
But,
If you own an iOS device (and have the cash) you’re going to buy an AirPod... convenience is a major selling point.
If you own an Android device you’re not going to buy an AirPod... it’s as simple as that.
The biggest issue from what I see are those "Trofessional Design Commentators" who judge the design without any knowledge & long-term experiences with the device. Unfortunately, public opinion was on their side.
I'd like to hear from any of those butterfly haters' true criticisms, instead of dropping words that everyone else repeats. To be honest, I, as somewhat a supporter of the butterfly keyboard, knows more flaws than all of them did.
Speaking of the shape, yes, the shape exists for good reasons. Yes, it doesn't fit every ears and rubber silence noise better and Apple can be the greatest evil of democracy, we know, but the shape exists for good reasons.
But maybe I asked too much for media these days which their primary goal was to generate rage bait.