Compared: Microsoft's Surface Book 3 versus Apple's iPad Pro

Posted:
in General Discussion edited June 2020
The arrival of Microsoft's Surface Book 3 has given mobile workers another option for a high-performance notebook-tablet hybrid, but could potential buyers be better served by an iPad Pro?

Microsoft's Surface Book 3 hybrid tablet
Microsoft's Surface Book 3 hybrid tablet


Microsoft introduced updates to its Surface tablet range on May 6, including the iPad-like Surface Go 2 and the tablet-notebook hybrid Surface Book 3. As with the preceding Surface Book 2, the third-generation offers a tablet with an attachable keyboard element, one which effectively turns it into a notebook.

With Apple's continued push to make the iPad Pro line a highly portable workstation and a notebook alternative, especially considering the launch of the new Magic Keyboard, it seems more appropriate to pit it against Microsoft's latest release.

While it may be more fitting to put the Intel-based Surface Book 3 against something like a MacBook Pro for a comparison, this wouldn't take into account the simple fact that the Surface is also a tablet, something a MacBook cannot become without some considerable after-market alterations. The touchscreen interface and extra camera on the rear also makes a tablet-vs-tablet comparison more apt than tablet-vs-notebook.

Specifications

iPad Pro (2020)Surface Book 3
Price (Starting Configurations)$799 to $999$1,599 to $2,299
Dimensions247.6mm x 178.5mm x 5.9mm,
280.6mm x 214.9mm x 5.9mm
312mm x 232mm x 23mm,
343mm x 251mm x 23mm
Weight471g, 641g1.5kg, 1.6kg, 1.9kg
ProcessorsA12Z Bionic chip with Neural Engine and M12 coprocessorQuad-core Core i5 1.2GHz,
Quad-core Core i7 1.3GHz,

Storage128GB, 256GB, 512GB, 1TB256GB, 512GB, 1TB, 2TB SSD
Memory6GB8GB, 16GB, 32GB 3733MHz LPDDR4X,
Display11-inch 2,388x1,668 Wide Color (P3) display with True Tone,
12.9-inch 2,732x2,048 Wide Color (P3) display with True Tone
13.5-inch 3,000x2,000 PixelSense display,
15-inch 3,240x2,160 PixelSense display
Graphics-Intel Iris Plus Graphics
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 4GB
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB
KeyboardMagic Keyboard, Smart Keyboard Folio (available separately)Detachable keyboard (included)
Connectivity1 USB-C, Smart Connector2 USB-A 3.1, 1 USB-C, 2 Surface Connect ports, SDXC card reader, headphone jack
NetworkingWi-Fi 6 802.11ax, Bluetooth 5.0Wi-Fi 802.11ac, Bluetooth 5.0
CamerasFront: 7MP TrueDepth with Face ID
Back: Wide 12MP, Ultra Wide 10MP, LiDAR.
Front: 5MP with Windows Hello
Back: 8MP
AudioFour speaker audio, five microphonesFront-facing stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos, dual far-field Studio Mics
Battery
28.65-watt-hour battery, 10 hours of usage,
36.71-watt-hour battery, 10 hours of usage
15.5 hours of typical device usage,
17.5 hours of typical device usage

Size and Weight

The Surface Book 3 is offered in two varieties, equipped with 13.5-inch and 15-inch displays. Since they are both larger than the two iPad Pro screens at 11-inches and 12.9-inches, it's understandable that Microsoft's offering will be considerably larger than Apple's version.

Though the Surface Books have luxuriously large footprints to accommodate the bigger screens, they are considerably thicker than the iPad Pro models, at 23mm to 5.9mm. The iPads are almost a quarter of the thickness of the Surface Book 3.

The Surface Book 3 keyboard could be attached backwards, storing it behind the screen while it is used as a tablet
The Surface Book 3 keyboard could be attached backwards, storing it behind the screen while it is used as a tablet


The size difference also informs the weight, which again puts Microsoft at the heavier end. While the iPads are 471 grams and 641 grams depending on size, the Surface Book 3 weighs differently depending on configuration, ranging from 1.5kg to a hefty 1.9kg at the high end.

It is easy to forget that Microsoft does include a keyboard with the Surface Book 3, which adds extra weight and thickness to the overall package.

The equivalent on the iPad Pro side would be to attach a Magic Keyboard. In terms of weight, the combination of the larger iPad Pro model and its respective Magic Keyboard is a total of over 1.3 kilos, which still makes it lighter than the Surface.

Even so, while this does add heft to the overall iPad package, the final result is one that is roughly triple the thickness of the iPad Pro alone at 15 millimeters, but still far thinner than its rival.

Displays

Touched upon earlier, the screens Microsoft uses are larger than Apple's versions. The 13.5-inch and 15-inch PixelSense displays have aspect ratios of 3:2 and a 1,600:1 contrast ratio. Their resolutions of 3,000 by 2,000 and 3,240 by 2,160 respectively gives them a more than adequate pixel density of 267 PPI for the 13.5-inch model, 260 PPI for the 15-inch.

The Surface Book 3 can be detached from the keyboard section quite easily
The Surface Book 3 can be detached from the keyboard section quite easily


On the iPad Pro side, the Liquid Retina IPS wide color (P3) displays with ProMotion and True Tone have resolutions of 2,388 by 1,668 and 2,732 by 2,048, depending on the size. The resulting pixel density of 264 PPI for both models puts them in the same ballpark as the Surface Books.

The two are relatively comparable on paper in this regard.

Performance

Apple's mobile processor performance has been improving steadily and has reached a level where it is at a par with desktop-bound equivalents, though it is only part of the equation.

The iPad Pro uses the A12Z Bionic SoC with the Neural Engine and M12 co-processor, paired with 6 gigabytes of memory. Under Geekbench's testing, it scores 1,112 or 1,113 in single-core testing, varying by model, rising to 4,578 and 4,608 for multi-core tests.





Microsoft's new Surface Book 3 models use either a tenth-generation quad-core Intel Core i5-1035G7 processor or a Core i7-1065G7 quad-core chip, with the 13-inch configurable with both and the 15-inch having only the Core i7. This is paired either with 8GB, 16GB, or 32GB of 3,733MHz LPDDR4X memory in the 13.5-inch model, while 16GB and 32GB are offered for the 15-inch version.

Searches on Geekbench for the chips offers up results from May 11 of a "Microsoft Corporation Surface Laptop" and a "Microsoft Corporation Surface Pro 7" for the Core i5 with 8GB of memory and Core i7 with 16GB respectively. It is highly probable these are the same model, but mislabeled.

According to the results, the Core i5 managed between 1,113 and 1,057 on the single-core score, and 3,906 to 4,299 for multi-core testing. The Core i7 listing fared better with 1,255 and 4,861 scores.

While it is easy to said the Core i7 Surface Book 3 is the most powerful of the group, the fact that the iPad Pro is at roughly the same level says a lot about Apple's designs, even with the memory disadvantage.

Outside of benchmarks, the Surface Book 3 is also assisted by Intel Iris Plus Graphics on the Core i5 model, an Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 4GB GPU on the 13.5-inch Core i7, and a GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB on the 15-inch model. The inclusion of the Nvidia GPUs will certainly help with graphic-intensive tasks and with applications that can take advantage of GPU acceleration.

Connectivity, Audio, Battery

As usual for Apple, the iPad Pro offers relatively few physical connection options, with the use of either a Smart Connector on the back or the USB-C port at the base. On the wireless side, it offers Wi-Fi 6 support and Bluetooth 5.0 connectivity, which covers a wide array of wire-free connection needs.

The Surface line typically goes further than Apple in offering connection points, and it is the same story again for the Surface Book 3. Onboard are a pair of USB-A 3.1 ports, a USB-C port, two Surface Connect ports, an SDXC card reader, and a headphone jack, as well as the same wireless connectivity as the iPad Pros.

Microsoft keeps the card reader on the keyboard section
Microsoft keeps the card reader on the keyboard section


In terms of audio, the Surface Book 3 has Dolby Atmos-enabled stereo speakers at the front, along with dual far-field Studio Mics. The iPad Pro elects for four speakers, enabling sound to come out of the left and right channels correctly regardless of its orientation, and a collection of five microphones.

Battery life for the iPad Pro pair is said to be 10 hours of usage. Microsoft certainly wins here, as the 13.5-inch model provides up to 15.5 hours of "typical device usage" from a single charge, rising to 17.5 hours for the 15-inch model.

Cameras

As the Surface Book and iPad Pro are usable as tablets, the camera situation is more important than within a notebook comparison. As one would expect, both offer better camera setups than the typical notebook.

The iPad Pro have the front-facing 7-megapixel TrueDepth camera that works with Face ID for authentication. Microsoft does drop behind here, as it only has a 5-megapixel camera on the front, though it is enabled for Windows Hello, its own facial recognition system.

The iPad Pro's cameras and LiDAR handily beat the Surface Book 3's offering
The iPad Pro's cameras and LiDAR handily beat the Surface Book 3's offering


Around the back, Apple wins again, as the iPad Pro have the 12-megapixel wide and 10-megapixel ultra-wide cameras, and the new LiDAR sensor. The Surface Book 3 has a rear 8-megapixel camera with autofocus.

The lacking cameras on the Surface Book 3 also means it cannot record video at the same level as the iPad Pro. The Surface can capture 1080P video, while the iPad boasts 4K video at up to 60 frames per second, or 1080p at 240fps slo-mo. It can even capture 8-megapixel still images while recording 4K video.

Pricing

The base models for the iPad Pro are $799 and $999 for the 11-inch and 12.9-inch versions respectively. For the Surface Book 3, the cheapest 13.5-inch Core i5 model is $1,599.99, while the 15-inch range starts from $2,299.99.

Again, this is far from the whole story.

The Surface Book 3's 13.5-inch base model ships with 256GB of storage and 8 gigabytes of memory. Microsoft's store page advises going to a Core i7 equivalent with 16 gigabytes of memory raises the price to $1,999.99, doubling the RAM and capacity to 32GB and 512GB makes it $2,499.99, and bringing it up to 1 terabyte of storage at its highest specification is $2,699.99.

Over on the 15-inch side, the base model ships with 16GB of RAM and 256GB of storage. Going to 32GB of RAM and 512GB of storage brings the price up to $2,799.99, 1TB of storage raises it to $2,999.99, and 2 terabytes for an eye-watering $3,399.99.

On the Apple side, pricing is somewhat cheaper.

The 11-inch iPad Pro's 128GB of storage can be increased to 256GB at a price of $899, 512GB for $1,099, and 1TB at $1,299. For the 12-inch, the 256GB version is $1,099, 512GB is $1,299, and 1TB is $1,499. Across all models, upgrading from the Wi-FI version to Wi-Fi + Cellular is a $150 upgrade.

Again, this also doesn't take into account the keyboard, which is included on the Surface Book 3 but not on the iPad Pro. Though the Magic Keyboard may seem expensive at $299 for the 11-inch version and $349 for the 12.9-inch, this still doesn't bring the price of the iPad Pro anywhere near the Microsoft equivalents.

If you went for the largest iPad at the highest capacity and added on the Magic Keyboard, you are still looking at a maximum outlay of $1,998.

In Summary

The Surface Book 3 attempts to solve the problem of making a notebook work similar to a tablet. Apple has looked at things from the opposite direction, making a tablet work similar to a notebook. In either case, the companies involved have arrived at solutions that most people would probably be happy to use.

They're portable, can be used for typing like a notebook, and offer the ease of a mobile device, all in one package. There is little to be concerned with here, as they both work in their own ways.

The Surface Book 3 in an assortment of orientations
The Surface Book 3 in an assortment of orientations


The iPad Pro does offer benefits over the Surface Book 3 in a few key areas, such as mass and weight, the mobile-centric specifications like the cameras, and the massive difference in cost.

Meanwhile, Microsoft's hybrid does have its own benefits, including that extremely long battery life. There's also features of Windows that iOS doesn't offer, such as being able to install work-related applications outside of a digital marketplace like the App Store, and the ability to develop apps, something not really offered on Apple's mobile platform.

It could easily be argued that acquiring a MacBook Pro instead of an iPad Pro would answer these shortcomings, though somewhat defeating the point of the comparison.

For those who need the graphical performance and are willing to pay for the higher amounts of memory, need to use Windows, and are willing to deal with a thicker and heavier device overall, the Surface has its audience. However, given that the vast majority of tasks you would want to do on a notebook could be performed on an iPad Pro instead, this does somewhat shrink the potential audience quite a bit.

Ultimately, if it's a Windows tablet that's required, the Surface Book 3 is an outstanding example of that kind of device. For everyone else, an iPad Pro will probably suffice.
muthuk_vanalingam
«1

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 28
    kkqd1337kkqd1337 Posts: 359member
    As you quite fairly said these two aren’t really directly comparable. 

    It comes down to what you do for a living and basically how much cash you have.

    Some people would be able to do all their work on an iPad and iPad OS has no doubt ramped up those numbers.

    But for me, and probably most people, would need an iPad and a laptop/desktop. Yeah I’d love to have a beautiful iPad. But I just can’t afford both a laptop and iPad right now. 
    williamlondonrazorpitOferbmunwatto_cobracornchip
  • Reply 2 of 28
    When Steve first introduced the iPhone, he compared the pricing with the cost of a phone and and iPod. You can buy a laptop and a tablet for the price of the Surface Book 3, but you’d be carrying 2 devices around. You pay a premium for the hybridization. I can see a use case where people want both laptop and tablet, yet need Windows OS. The Surface Book 3 fits the bill. 
    williamlondonmuthuk_vanalingamwatto_cobra
  • Reply 3 of 28
    kupuakupua Posts: 10member
    What's really ironic is that many TV News stations have the Surface as shelf props, and the Anchors & Reporters regularly use iPads 
    williamlondonbloggerblograzorpitjdb8167randominternetpersonpscooter63watto_cobracornchip
  • Reply 4 of 28
    razorpitrazorpit Posts: 1,796member
    I need Mac OS and enjoy the option of using iPad OS. While there are improvements to be made in iPad OS, generally speaking it is heading in the right direction. With that said I think there is room for a larger Pro. Would love to see a 15" or 16" version on its next redesign.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 5 of 28
    knowitallknowitall Posts: 1,648member
    Certainly, yes.
  • Reply 6 of 28
    knowitallknowitall Posts: 1,648member
    When Steve first introduced the iPhone, he compared the pricing with the cost of a phone and and iPod. You can buy a laptop and a tablet for the price of the Surface Book 3, but you’d be carrying 2 devices around. You pay a premium for the hybridization. I can see a use case where people want both laptop and tablet, yet need Windows OS. The Surface Book 3 fits the bill. 
    Impossible, nobody ‘needs‘ Windows.
    williamlondonpscooter63watto_cobra
  • Reply 7 of 28
    knowitallknowitall Posts: 1,648member
    GPU is much better on the iPad, as is OS support.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 8 of 28
    KITAKITA Posts: 368member
    Outside of benchmarks, the Surface Book 3 is also assisted by Intel Iris Plus Graphics on the Core i5 model, an Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 4GB GPU on the 13.5-inch Core i7, and a GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB on the 15-inch model. The inclusion of the Nvidia GPUs will certainly help with graphic-intensive tasks and with applications that can take advantage of GPU acceleration.

    The 15" can be also be equipped with a Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q (similar to an RTX 2070 Max-Q).

  • Reply 9 of 28
    dyonoctisdyonoctis Posts: 48member
    knowitall said:
    GPU is much better on the iPad, as is OS support.
    Over the base Intel gpu sure, but the GTX 1660 Ti ? I doubt it. If apple had such skills that could make something as powerfull with such a low power cossumption, then they are literally wasting everyone time by using AMD gpus.
    williamlondonwatto_cobra
  • Reply 10 of 28
    dyonoctis said:
    knowitall said:
    GPU is much better on the iPad, as is OS support.
    ....If apple had such skills that could make something as powerfull with such a low power cossumption, then they are literally wasting everyone time by using AMD gpus.
    Who says the Surface's power consumption is lower than the iPad's?  Note that the Surfaces weigh 3 times more than the iPads.  That weight can translate to a much larger battery.
  • Reply 11 of 28
    apple ][apple ][ Posts: 9,233member
    It seems like they are in two completely different price categories.

    The cheapest iPad Pro ($799) is exactly half the price of the cheapest surface book 3 ($1599).
    pscooter63watto_cobra
  • Reply 12 of 28
    flitetymflitetym Posts: 3member
    I’ve been an iPad “fanboy” for just about 10 years, and frankly, it was that old “there’s an app for that” ad campaign that hooked me, and I never looked back.

    It was more than an attachment to a piece of hardware: it was an association with a company that got off of its elitist throne, and delivered technology  for everyday computer users.

    The iPad has succeeded by making computers simple, and there’s nothing on the horizon that will supplant the iPad for the millions of users that appreciate “just enough computer” to serve as the “compleat digital assistant.”

    IOS is the future, and I just don’t see how a computer based on MS-DOS — of any stripe — will supplant the iPad for everyday, user friendly, “pedestrian” use. I remember those old commercials saying “if you can point your finger, you can operate an iPad.” Apple was the computer “... for the rest of us.” On that point, Apple should stop “chasing” Microsoft.

    Remember that Apple was “on its death bed” a decade ago, when “mean old Microsoft” ruled the consumer digital realm. But there are times when you “bet the farm” on an idea or concept; and Apple did just that with the iPad — and MS never caught up.

    No doubt the Surface will continue to serve it’s “snobby, horn-rimmed glasses” consumer base well. But the iPad has charted a new direction. And that is where the future lies.
    pscooter63williamlondonwatto_cobra
  • Reply 13 of 28
    GeorgeBMacGeorgeBMac Posts: 10,264member
    I find it odd that the comparison was between a  iPad Pro sans keyboard and the Surface.
    Without a keyboard, the iPad Pro is simply a different product in a different category -- plus it saved a bunch of money (almost 50%) off of its cost.

    I'm not trying to advocate or dys either one -- but this just doesn't seem to be comparing Apples to Apples.
    randominternetpersonbmun
  • Reply 14 of 28

    The Surface Book 3 attempts to solve the problem of making a notebook work similar to a tablet. Apple has looked at things from the opposite direction, making a tablet work similar to a notebook.
    It seems a lot easier (or at least more "natural") to build upon a "touch first" OS to add notebook/desktop OS features than the other way around.

    Who can say if this was the strategy all along, but Apple has the luxury of being able to do this with iPadOS.

    While the MS 1st-party apps and perhaps certain other major app providers grow accommodations for touch, it seems Windows will continue to be hobbled by the huge numbers of smaller, niche and legacy apps that just can't or won't be able to adapt to new UI paradigms. For all these apps designed with a mouse-centric point-and-click UI, that becomes the only practical method of interaction, limiting what might be considered "Windows compatibility" in the future. With iPadOS apps built with touch in mind, interacting via mouse has recently been neatly sorted out, so we can already go either way.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 15 of 28
    knowitall said:
    When Steve first introduced the iPhone, he compared the pricing with the cost of a phone and and iPod. You can buy a laptop and a tablet for the price of the Surface Book 3, but you’d be carrying 2 devices around. You pay a premium for the hybridization. I can see a use case where people want both laptop and tablet, yet need Windows OS. The Surface Book 3 fits the bill. 
    Impossible, nobody ‘needs‘ Windows.
    Tell that to millions of people at companies and corporations who require their employees to use Windows.  Sure there are mavericks in many of those settings that find a way to use their personal MacBook instead, but they are the exceptions.  (Of course there are other companies that allow employees to use either and pay for either, but your assertion was that nobody "needs" Windows.  That's only true if you add "Nobody needs to work at a company that requires Windows."
    GeorgeBMacwilliamlondonwatto_cobra
  • Reply 16 of 28
    geekmeegeekmee Posts: 473member
    Like IBM missed data moving to the PC, Microsoft missed data going mobile to the phone.
    Like IBM hoping data would always require mainframes, Microsoft is whistling in the dark.
    edited May 2020 pscooter63watto_cobra
  • Reply 17 of 28
    dyonoctisdyonoctis Posts: 48member
    dyonoctis said:
    knowitall said:
    GPU is much better on the iPad, as is OS support.
    ....If apple had such skills that could make something as powerfull with such a low power cossumption, then they are literally wasting everyone time by using AMD gpus.
    Who says the Surface's power consumption is lower than the iPad's?  Note that the Surfaces weigh 3 times more than the iPads.  That weight can translate to a much larger battery.
    Where did I said that the surface had a lower power consumption ? What I said is that if Apple GPUs who can fit in something as slim as an Ipad, without any active cooling was way better than a GTX 1660 Ti who need active cooling to keep those 120 watts in check, then they are making the best GPUs in the world, and everyone else is at least 10 years behind. The 1660Ti is faster than most of the GPUs currently used by apple. Only the mac pro/imac pro have faster options.

    My wording might have been poor, but that's what I was saying.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 18 of 28
    dyonoctisdyonoctis Posts: 48member

    The Surface Book 3 attempts to solve the problem of making a notebook work similar to a tablet. Apple has looked at things from the opposite direction, making a tablet work similar to a notebook.
    It seems a lot easier (or at least more "natural") to build upon a "touch first" OS to add notebook/desktop OS features than the other way around.

    Who can say if this was the strategy all along, but Apple has the luxury of being able to do this with iPadOS.

    While the MS 1st-party apps and perhaps certain other major app providers grow accommodations for touch, it seems Windows will continue to be hobbled by the huge numbers of smaller, niche and legacy apps that just can't or won't be able to adapt to new UI paradigms. For all these apps designed with a mouse-centric point-and-click UI, that becomes the only practical method of interaction, limiting what might be considered "Windows compatibility" in the future. With iPadOS apps built with touch in mind, interacting via mouse has recently been neatly sorted out, so we can already go either way.
    Yep. Microsoft own success in the 90's is now an hindrance. They can't move forward since so many of their customers are still looking to the past. If windows cannot run desktop apps, then no one wants it.

    And windows phone fail means that the windows store will always be lacking. There's simply no point for them to push a full touch based windows, when there's no app to use at all, so they have to keep doing that hybridisation.

    Unless android somehow kick the bucket, there is just no space for a third player in the mobile market. That train is looooong gone.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 19 of 28
    Your geek bench numbers are completely , completely wrong. 5K single and 18K multi at its lowest clock speed......I had such difficulty reading through this comparison that  I was expecting to find some sanity by sifting through the comments. I’m in complete shock at the misinformation here. I own both an iPad Pro 12.9” and a surface book 2. I just ordered the surface book 3 with quadro graphics. I am a designer, draftsperson, 3D model creator and rendering artist. I love my iPad for a great number of things that it excels at...it is not, not even a little bit, a solution for production based tools that require better hardware and the full power of a desktop-rated OS. Even if we could port MacOS,  No way in hell my iPad could run even 1 of the 10 applications I use on a weekly basis...it doesn’t have the hardware. It is not comparable as it is not capable. It cannot use any of the Adobe suite applications which is why Adobe created trimmed down versions for iOS. Whew...I thought about really digging deep and listing the thousands of operations that the iPad can’t handle and just decided it is such a waste of effort. These two devices are not comparable, their is no argument there. The tablet portion of the surface book 3 has enough graphic fidelity to handle OpenGL based vector graphics from all of the top applications in the industry. Nuff said, iPad cannot. That’s ignoring the fact that the keyboard portion can remain attached and reversed, creating a tablet that sports some of the best Mobile GPU’s in the industry, albeit a heavy tablet. We’re talking about a device that sports 240 tensor cores and can be carried around in one arm.
    Pressure sensitivity of the Apple Pencil is unlisted and for good reason, it’s not as sophisticated of a device as the surface pen with 4K pressure sensitivity and lower parallax and latency. Having owned 19 apple devices I can understand the vortex that is created by the Apple culture. Lock down and dependency is core to Apples values masked under the veil of the security-trumps-customization approach. I still love my iPad Pro for everything that it excels at, truly. But their is simply no comparison here. Surface book destroys an iPad for professionals in every way...and yes it costs a lot more.
    williamlondonKITAcrowleybmuncornchip
  • Reply 20 of 28
    danvmdanvm Posts: 1,164member
    geekmee said:
    Like IBM missed data moving to the PC, Microsoft missed data going mobile to the phone.
    Like IBM hoping data would always require mainframes, Microsoft is whistling in the dark.
    Yes, MS missed data going to mobile to phone, but didn't miss data going to cloud.   ;)
    cornchip
Sign In or Register to comment.