Compared: Dell XPS 15 and XPS 17 versus Apple's 16-inch MacBook Pro
Dell's new XPS 15 and XPS 17 lines are a direct competitor to Apple's 16-inch MacBook Pro, but are the rival notebooks any match for Apple's top-of-the-range model? On paper, it could be too close to call.
Dell XPS 15, XPS 17
As one of the biggest PC vendors in the world, Dell is considered competition to Apple in the notebook market, with its XPS line being the nearest mainstream notebook Dell produces that is close to what Apple offers in its MacBook Pro lineup.
In May, Dell started to sell updated versions of the XPS range for 2020, with the high-performance notebook lineup including a redesigned XPS 15 alongside the larger XPS 17. The super-sized model is a revival of the variant after an almost ten-year hiatus, with the bigger screen making it a serious contender to the 16-inch MacBook Pro for mobile professionals and those with considerable processing requirements.
This comparison is based on data provided by Dell itself, and it has its limitations. While full details are available for the XPS 15, due to it being currently available to order, the same cannot be said for the XPS 17, as Dell has yet to offer a complete specification list ahead of its mid-June release.
Obviously, most of the design elements are carried over to the XPS 17, and in both cases result in a relatively appealing package.
The XPS 15 measures 13.6 inches by 9.1 inches for its footprint, while the XPS 17 is bigger at 14.7 inches by 9.8 inches. The 16-inch MacBook Pro, by its nature, slots in between the two at 14.1 inches by 9.7 inches, making it almost as wide as the XPS 17, but in the middle of the two in terms of length.
The Dell XPS 17, closed
The same cannot be said about the thickness of the models. Even with Dell's design refresh, the XPS 15 is 0.7 inches thick while the XPS 17 is 0.8 inches, with both handily beaten by the MacBook's 0.6-inch thickness.
Given we are dealing with larger notebooks with differing footprints, you would at least expect the mid-sized MacBook Pro to be the middle for thickness, but Dell failed to make the XPS 15 slim enough.
For the XPS models, Dell offers a choice of two different displays. The standard display, offered on the lower-cost models, is a 1,920 by 1,200 InfinityEdge Anti-Glare screen, with a 1,650:1 contrast ratio and 500 nits of brightness.
While the base screen is lacking, the alternative on the higher-up configurations is a 4K version, offering a resolution of 3,740 by 2,400 and the same contrast ratio and 500 nits of brightness as the lower-resolution version. Furthermore, the 4K variant offers a feature that the MacBook Pro doesn't have, in the form of touch sensitivity.
Display options for the XPS models include a 4K-resolution touchscreen.
This higher-resolution display and touch controls make Dell's screens a more compelling avenue for users, but the option is also a factor in another part of the comparison that would usually be discussed alongside its size: weight.
In both sizes, the higher-resolution displays of the XPS models result in making the notebook heavier, increasing the non-touch 4-pound XPS 15 to 4.5 pounds, and the 4.7-pound XPS 17 without touch sensitivity to 5.5 pounds.
On Apple's side, there's only one weight to consider, and that's 4.3 pounds. That puts the 16-inch MacBook Pro between the non-touch and touch-enabled versions of the XPS 15, and far below the XPS 17's heft.
These are large notebooks, and while size matters, weight is equally important, since these are items designed to be carried around.
Apple plainly wins on this front. The MacBook Pro's display outshines the lower-resolution XPS screens while being quite close to the upper displays, without the extra heft.
On Dell's side, the XPS 15 starts with a quad-core Core i5 that has a maximum clock speed of 4.5GHz, with options to go for a six-core Core i7 with a 5GHz maximum clock, or an eight-core Core i7 that can be pushed to run at 5.1GHz.
At the time of writing, Dell hasn't released the full processor list for the XPS 17, but it will range from the same quad-core Core i5 as in the XPS 15 to an 8-core Core i9, with a higher maximum clock speed of 5.3 GHz.
The inside view of the Dell XPS 15.
Arguably, just looking at the core counts and clock speeds would put Dell as being in the lead here at the higher end, though not by that much. However, you also have to take into account that Apple uses ninth-generation processors, while Dell is using tenth-generation.
The generational difference will infer some more performance benefits to Dell's models for the time being, but it may not be for too long. Apple already uses tenth-generation processors in the upper-tier 13-inch MacBook Pro, and it wouldn't be outside the realm of possibility for Apple to upgrade the 16-inch line's processors at some point.
Memory is a factor in Apple's favor, as it equips the 16-inch MacBook Pro with 16 gigabytes of DDR4 as standard, with a maximum capacity of 64 gigabytes. Dell's XPS 15 starts at a lower 8 gigabytes, though it can be increased up to a matching 64 gigabytes.
Dell does have a slight advantage for memory, as it uses the faster 2,933MHz DDR4 instead of 2,666MHz memory that Apple includes in its notebooks.
So far, Dell has confirmed the XPS 17 will use DDR4 2,933MHz memory, with a maximum capacity of 64 gigabytes, but not how much will be offered in base configurations.
Apple offers the Radeon Pro 5300M 4GB, 5500M 4GB, or 5500M 8GB.
The XPS 15 is offered with the choice of either no discrete graphics or the inclusion of a GeForce GTX 1650Ti 4GB with Max-Q. On the XPS 17, the GTX 1650Ti 4GB is the default option, but can be exchanged for a GeForce RTX 2060 6GB GPU.
Results for Passmark G3D Mark benchmark tests puts the Radeon Pro 5300M at a score of 6,007, with the 5500M doing a fair bit better at 6,945 points. The GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q isn't as good as the Radeon GPUs, achieving just 5,335 under the same benchmark.
The upgrade to the RTX 2060 on the XPS 17 will be a considerable performance boost, at least according to the benchmark, with the mobile GPU hitting 11,359 points.
While Dell does well with the processors, the GPU choice ranges from being sub-par against the MacBook Pro, or in the event of someone opting for the RTX on the XPS 17, far outperforming its rivals.
To someone with a need for high graphical performance while on the move, the MacBook Pro may seem like the better option on this front. Of course, this ignores the possibility of acquiring an external GPU enclosure and buying a more powerful desktop-class graphics card, or buying a desktop PC or Mac like the Mac Pro, which offer more flexible and higher performance graphical options.
Apple uses the usual four Thunderbolt 3 ports and headphone jack combination on the MacBook Pro. It's a long-standing setup that Apple is unlikely to change anytime soon.
Dell only includes two Thunderbolt 3 ports on the XPS 15, but uses four on the XPS 17
For the XPS models, Dell has somehow gone down a different route to usual. Instead of the long list of ports, the XPS 15 instead has two Thunderbolt 3 ports with power delivery and DisplayPort support, one USB-C 3.1 with similar support, a full-size SD card reader, and a headphone jack.
Somehow, Dell's design decision has led to a situation where the MacBook Pro offers the ability to connect more devices than the XPS 15. Instead of giving users the option of plugging in their own fourth peripheral, Dell makes the choice for them with the card reader.
Dell could have evened things out by submitting to the dongle lifestyle fully instead of partially, replacing the USB-C and card reader with more Thunderbolt 3 ports, but it didn't do that.
On the XPS 17, Dell offers an extra two Thunderbolt 3 ports on top of the XPS 15's collection, bringing it up to four Thunderbolt 3 ports, the card reader, and a headphone jack. This does make the XPS 17 the best for connectivity, though not really by much.
On wireless connectivity, you're looking at Bluetooth 5.0 support on all devices, while Dell edges the win on Wi-Fi by supporting Wi-Fi 6, with Apple using Wi-Fi 802.11ac.
Apple also does better on the microphone front, using three with directional beamforming, while Dell employs just two mics. For video conferences, all use a 720p webcam.
The MacBook Pro uses Touch ID for biometric security, embedded into the Touch Bar on the keyboard. Dell matches this with its fingerprint reader built into the power button, as part of Windows Hello.
On battery life, Apple in theory should take the lead as it uses a 100-watt-hour battery that boasts up to 11 hours of usage time. However, while Dell uses 56-watt-hour and 86-watt-hour battery packs in the XPS 15, or 56- and 97-watt-hours in the XPS 17, it also claims to be able to have a battery life of up to 25 hours on a single charge.
For the XPS 15, Dell has five starting configuration options. On the low end is the $1,299.99, which sports 8GB of memory, 256GB of storage, the Core i5 processor option, the non-touch display, the 56WHr battery, and no discrete graphics option.
Moving up one stage adds in the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti 4GB, the upper-size 86WHr battery, and switches the processor to the six-core Core i7 at $1,749.99. The $2,199.99 model brings the RAM up to 16GB, the storage up to 512GB, and introduces the touch-enabled display.
The second most expensive model of the range is priced at $2,299.99, with the extra $100 increasing the storage to 1 terabyte. At the highest is the $2,449.99 model, which adds more memory to the equation, bringing it up to 32 gigabytes.
Pricing for all tiers of the XPS 17 has yet to be detailed, but the range is expected to start from $1,499.99.
The Dell XPS 15
The XPS 15 seems like the better deal looking at the lower end of things, albeit without comparable specifications to the lowest Apple offers. The equivalent would be the middle option of the five XPS 15 starting points, but even the $2,199.99 price is still practically $100 cheaper than the MacBook Pro.
Moving to the heavier end of the ranges, the MacBook Pro using the highest processor option 64GB of memory, the Radeon Pro 5500M with 8GB of GDDR6 memory, and 2 terabytes of storage works out to be $4,299, with further room to go to 8 terabytes for $6,099.
Maxing out the Dell XPS 15 configurator with the best processor, 64GB of memory, the highest 2TB capacity option, the higher-resolution touch-enabled display, and the bigger battery brings the price up to $3,049.
For comparable high-specification models, this seems like Dell is the better deal, even taking into account the XPS 17 will cost a few hundred more to account for the larger display.
After-market upgrades also allow users to get around the potentially high cost of selecting better components at the time of purchase, by putting their own separately-sourced and cheaper version in place of the cheapest version offered by the manufacturer.
Plainly speaking, Apple doesn't let users perform after-market upgrades. Neither the memory nor the storage are user-accessible after purchase, so they cannot be replaced or added to at all.
While the storage could be supplemented by an external Thunderbolt drive or network storage, there isn't such a workaround for the memory. You're stuck with whatever RAM value you agreed to at the time of purchase.
This also means that, if you wanted to have a MacBook Pro with a higher storage capacity and more memory down the line, you're going to be shelling out for those upgrades from the outset, and at Apple's pricing. Or alternately buying a brand new model.
Unlike Apple, Dell makes its notebooks user-serviceable, with upgrade options available post-purchase for both memory and storage. There are a pair of memory slots, two M.2 spaces, and even the battery can be replaced once it grows old, without needing to send it off for servicing.
This does mean that a user with the right knowhow can change the memory and RAM straight away after receiving the notebook. Down the road, upgrades are still going to be possible, and could be made in line with the user's actual needs at that time.
The XPS 15 is smaller but thicker than the MacBook Pro, but while the low-end models are underwhelming performance and specifications-wise, it's a fair bit cheaper to go for Dell's equivalent on a roughly comparable configuration. Dell's 4K-resolution screen and touch capabilities are also attractive elements that the MacBook Pro simply cannot match at this time.
You're also afforded the ability to actually upgrade and replace some components of the XPS range, which you simply cannot with the MacBook Pro.
Apple does pull away with several wins, such as its audio capabilities, larger battery, generally better graphics with the exception of the RTX GPU, and starts users off with 16 gigabytes of memory instead of 8 gigabytes. You also have the unexpected benefit on the 16-inch MacBook Pro of having more ports to use than the XPS 15, though the position is reversed for the XPS 17.
Also bear in mind that the MacBook Pro also has macOS, a secure operating system that many creatives and power users will be familiar with. Sure, you could use Windows on the Dell or move onto a Linux distribution if you need to, but if you want Windows and macOS, the only way to do that in a notebook officially is to get the MacBook Pro.
The 16-inch MacBook Pro's chips are a full generation behind the XPS 15's tenth-generation processors, and even with similar core counts and clock speeds, the newer generation processors are simply better chips.
A simple solution for Apple to overtake Dell in this front is to simply use newer processors and GPUs, potentially as part of an annual refresh that has so far not taken place for the 16-inch model. It would be expected that Apple would follow what it did with the 13-inch MacBook Pro in May with similar tenth-generation processor and GPU upgrades.
If Apple does such a product line refresh, it would once more give the 16-inch MacBook Pro the upper hand over its Dell rivals. All it needs is for Apple to actually make the upgrade.
Dell XPS 15, XPS 17
As one of the biggest PC vendors in the world, Dell is considered competition to Apple in the notebook market, with its XPS line being the nearest mainstream notebook Dell produces that is close to what Apple offers in its MacBook Pro lineup.
In May, Dell started to sell updated versions of the XPS range for 2020, with the high-performance notebook lineup including a redesigned XPS 15 alongside the larger XPS 17. The super-sized model is a revival of the variant after an almost ten-year hiatus, with the bigger screen making it a serious contender to the 16-inch MacBook Pro for mobile professionals and those with considerable processing requirements.
This comparison is based on data provided by Dell itself, and it has its limitations. While full details are available for the XPS 15, due to it being currently available to order, the same cannot be said for the XPS 17, as Dell has yet to offer a complete specification list ahead of its mid-June release.
Specifications
| 16-inch MacBook Pro | Dell XPS 15 | Dell XPS 17 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Display Size (inches) | 16 | 15.6 | 17.3 |
| Max Resolution | 3,072 x 1,920 | 1,920 x 1,200 non-touch, 3,840 x 2,400 touch | 1,920 x 1,200 non-touch, 3,840 x 2,400 touch |
| Brightness | 500 nits | 500 nits | 500 nits |
| Display Technology | Wide Color (P3), True Tone | InfinityEdge Anti-Glare | InfinityEdge Anti-Glare |
| Processors | 4.5Ghz 6-core i7, 4.8Ghz 8-core i9, 5.0Ghz 8-core i9 | 4.5GHz 4-core i5, 5GHz 6-core i7, 5.1Ghz 8-core i7 | 4.5Ghz 4-core i5, 5.3GHz 8-core i9 |
| Memory | 16GB 2,666MHz DDR4, up to 64GB | 8GB DDR4 2,933MHz DDR4, up to 64GB | Up to 64GB DDR4 2,933MHz |
| Graphics (integrated) | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | Intel UHD Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics |
| Graphics (discrete) | Radeon Pro 5300M 4GB, Radeon Pro 5500M 4GB, Radeon Pro 5500M 8GB | GeForce GTX 1650Ti 4GB, None | Geforce GTX 1650Ti 4GB, GeForce RTX 2060 6GB |
| Storage | 512GB, 1TB, 2TB, 4TB, 8TB | 256GB, 512GB, 1TB, 2TB | 256GB, 512GB, 1TB, 2TB |
| Trackpad | Force Touch | Yes | Yes |
| Keyboard | Backlit with ambient light sensor, Touch Bar with Touch ID | Yes | Yes |
| Dimensions (inches) | 14.1 x 9.7 x 0.6 | 13.6 x 9.1 x 0.7 | 14.7 x 9.8 x 0.8 |
| Weight (pounds) | 4.3 | 4 for non-touch display, 4.5 with touch display | 4.7 for non-touch display, 5.5 with touch display |
| Battery | 100-watt-hour, 11 hours of usage | 56-watt-hour, 86-watt-hour | 56-watt-hour, 97 watt-hour |
| Ports | 4x Thunderbolt 3, Headphone Jack | 2 x Thunderbolt 3, USB-C, SD card reader, Headphone Jack | 4 x Thunderbolt 3, USB-C, SD card reader, Headphone Jack |
| Wireless Connectivity | Wi-Fi 802.11ac, Bluetooth 5.0 | Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.0 | Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.0 |
| Audio | 6 speakers with force-cancelling woofers, Dolby Atmos, 3 microphones with directional beamforming. | 4 speakers with Waves MaxxAudio Pro tuning, 2 microphone array | Waves MaxxAudio Pro tuning |
| Price (Base Configurations) | From $2,399 to $2,799 Lowest 16-inch MacBook Pro prices | From $1,299.99 to $2,449.99 Dell Preferred Accounts: Save 5% with code DPA5 | From $1,499.99 Coming soon |
XPS 15 and XPS 17 vs 16-inch MacBook Pro - Size
Dell is pitching the XPS 15 as being redesigned, making it the "smallest 15.6-inch performance class laptop." The design changes include making the chassis from two pieces of machined aluminum and a new hinge design for the InfinityEdge display to be used.Obviously, most of the design elements are carried over to the XPS 17, and in both cases result in a relatively appealing package.
The XPS 15 measures 13.6 inches by 9.1 inches for its footprint, while the XPS 17 is bigger at 14.7 inches by 9.8 inches. The 16-inch MacBook Pro, by its nature, slots in between the two at 14.1 inches by 9.7 inches, making it almost as wide as the XPS 17, but in the middle of the two in terms of length.
The Dell XPS 17, closed
The same cannot be said about the thickness of the models. Even with Dell's design refresh, the XPS 15 is 0.7 inches thick while the XPS 17 is 0.8 inches, with both handily beaten by the MacBook's 0.6-inch thickness.
Given we are dealing with larger notebooks with differing footprints, you would at least expect the mid-sized MacBook Pro to be the middle for thickness, but Dell failed to make the XPS 15 slim enough.
XPS 15 and XPS 17 vs 16-inch MacBook Pro - Displays and weight
The 16-inch MacBook Pro has, as the name suggests, a 16-inch Retina display, equipped with Wide Color (P3) support and True Tone. It also sports a resolution of 3,072 by 1,920 and can output a maximum of 500 nits of brightness.For the XPS models, Dell offers a choice of two different displays. The standard display, offered on the lower-cost models, is a 1,920 by 1,200 InfinityEdge Anti-Glare screen, with a 1,650:1 contrast ratio and 500 nits of brightness.
While the base screen is lacking, the alternative on the higher-up configurations is a 4K version, offering a resolution of 3,740 by 2,400 and the same contrast ratio and 500 nits of brightness as the lower-resolution version. Furthermore, the 4K variant offers a feature that the MacBook Pro doesn't have, in the form of touch sensitivity.
Display options for the XPS models include a 4K-resolution touchscreen.
This higher-resolution display and touch controls make Dell's screens a more compelling avenue for users, but the option is also a factor in another part of the comparison that would usually be discussed alongside its size: weight.
In both sizes, the higher-resolution displays of the XPS models result in making the notebook heavier, increasing the non-touch 4-pound XPS 15 to 4.5 pounds, and the 4.7-pound XPS 17 without touch sensitivity to 5.5 pounds.
On Apple's side, there's only one weight to consider, and that's 4.3 pounds. That puts the 16-inch MacBook Pro between the non-touch and touch-enabled versions of the XPS 15, and far below the XPS 17's heft.
These are large notebooks, and while size matters, weight is equally important, since these are items designed to be carried around.
Apple plainly wins on this front. The MacBook Pro's display outshines the lower-resolution XPS screens while being quite close to the upper displays, without the extra heft.
XPS 15 and XPS 17 vs 16-inch MacBook Pro - Processors and memory
Apple's 16-inch MacBook Pro is offered with a choice of three processors: A 2.6GHz six-core Core i7 that clocks at 4.5GHz under Turbo Boost, a 2.3GHz eight-core Core i9 that boosts to 4.8Ghz, or a 2.4GHz eight-core Core i9 boostable to 5GHz.On Dell's side, the XPS 15 starts with a quad-core Core i5 that has a maximum clock speed of 4.5GHz, with options to go for a six-core Core i7 with a 5GHz maximum clock, or an eight-core Core i7 that can be pushed to run at 5.1GHz.
At the time of writing, Dell hasn't released the full processor list for the XPS 17, but it will range from the same quad-core Core i5 as in the XPS 15 to an 8-core Core i9, with a higher maximum clock speed of 5.3 GHz.
The inside view of the Dell XPS 15.
Arguably, just looking at the core counts and clock speeds would put Dell as being in the lead here at the higher end, though not by that much. However, you also have to take into account that Apple uses ninth-generation processors, while Dell is using tenth-generation.
The generational difference will infer some more performance benefits to Dell's models for the time being, but it may not be for too long. Apple already uses tenth-generation processors in the upper-tier 13-inch MacBook Pro, and it wouldn't be outside the realm of possibility for Apple to upgrade the 16-inch line's processors at some point.
Memory is a factor in Apple's favor, as it equips the 16-inch MacBook Pro with 16 gigabytes of DDR4 as standard, with a maximum capacity of 64 gigabytes. Dell's XPS 15 starts at a lower 8 gigabytes, though it can be increased up to a matching 64 gigabytes.
Dell does have a slight advantage for memory, as it uses the faster 2,933MHz DDR4 instead of 2,666MHz memory that Apple includes in its notebooks.
So far, Dell has confirmed the XPS 17 will use DDR4 2,933MHz memory, with a maximum capacity of 64 gigabytes, but not how much will be offered in base configurations.
XPS 15 and XPS 17 vs 16-inch MacBook Pro - Graphical power
The integrated graphics consist of Intel UHD Graphics 630 in the MacBook Pro, and Intel UHD Graphics for the two Dells. Despite the somewhat confusing name convention, the XPS' version is newer, though given this is integrated graphics and discrete graphical options will be available in the majority of cases, it's relatively moot.Apple offers the Radeon Pro 5300M 4GB, 5500M 4GB, or 5500M 8GB.
The XPS 15 is offered with the choice of either no discrete graphics or the inclusion of a GeForce GTX 1650Ti 4GB with Max-Q. On the XPS 17, the GTX 1650Ti 4GB is the default option, but can be exchanged for a GeForce RTX 2060 6GB GPU.
Results for Passmark G3D Mark benchmark tests puts the Radeon Pro 5300M at a score of 6,007, with the 5500M doing a fair bit better at 6,945 points. The GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q isn't as good as the Radeon GPUs, achieving just 5,335 under the same benchmark.
The upgrade to the RTX 2060 on the XPS 17 will be a considerable performance boost, at least according to the benchmark, with the mobile GPU hitting 11,359 points.
While Dell does well with the processors, the GPU choice ranges from being sub-par against the MacBook Pro, or in the event of someone opting for the RTX on the XPS 17, far outperforming its rivals.
To someone with a need for high graphical performance while on the move, the MacBook Pro may seem like the better option on this front. Of course, this ignores the possibility of acquiring an external GPU enclosure and buying a more powerful desktop-class graphics card, or buying a desktop PC or Mac like the Mac Pro, which offer more flexible and higher performance graphical options.
XPS 15 and XPS 17 vs 16-inch MacBook Pro - Wi-Fi, ports, and connectivity
The port situation normally is a close-run thing, with the PC-based notebook offering a plethora of connection options while the MacBook Pro uses a more limited palette. This time around, things are actually quite close.Apple uses the usual four Thunderbolt 3 ports and headphone jack combination on the MacBook Pro. It's a long-standing setup that Apple is unlikely to change anytime soon.
Dell only includes two Thunderbolt 3 ports on the XPS 15, but uses four on the XPS 17
For the XPS models, Dell has somehow gone down a different route to usual. Instead of the long list of ports, the XPS 15 instead has two Thunderbolt 3 ports with power delivery and DisplayPort support, one USB-C 3.1 with similar support, a full-size SD card reader, and a headphone jack.
Somehow, Dell's design decision has led to a situation where the MacBook Pro offers the ability to connect more devices than the XPS 15. Instead of giving users the option of plugging in their own fourth peripheral, Dell makes the choice for them with the card reader.
Dell could have evened things out by submitting to the dongle lifestyle fully instead of partially, replacing the USB-C and card reader with more Thunderbolt 3 ports, but it didn't do that.
On the XPS 17, Dell offers an extra two Thunderbolt 3 ports on top of the XPS 15's collection, bringing it up to four Thunderbolt 3 ports, the card reader, and a headphone jack. This does make the XPS 17 the best for connectivity, though not really by much.
On wireless connectivity, you're looking at Bluetooth 5.0 support on all devices, while Dell edges the win on Wi-Fi by supporting Wi-Fi 6, with Apple using Wi-Fi 802.11ac.
Other Specifications
The MacBook Pro offers a theoretically better audio experience, packing 6 speakers with force-canceling woofers and Dolby Atmos support, while the XPS 15 uses four speakers with Waves MaxxAudio Pro tuning. While Waves MaxxAudio is confirmed for the XPS 17, it is unknown how many speakers it will have.Apple also does better on the microphone front, using three with directional beamforming, while Dell employs just two mics. For video conferences, all use a 720p webcam.
The MacBook Pro uses Touch ID for biometric security, embedded into the Touch Bar on the keyboard. Dell matches this with its fingerprint reader built into the power button, as part of Windows Hello.
On battery life, Apple in theory should take the lead as it uses a 100-watt-hour battery that boasts up to 11 hours of usage time. However, while Dell uses 56-watt-hour and 86-watt-hour battery packs in the XPS 15, or 56- and 97-watt-hours in the XPS 17, it also claims to be able to have a battery life of up to 25 hours on a single charge.
XPS 15 and XPS 17 vs 16-inch MacBook Pro - Pricing
Apple's 16-inch MacBook Pro range ships in two base versions. The lower tier using the 2.6GHz 6-core Core i9 with 16GB of memory, 512GB of storage, and the Radeon Pro 5300M costs $2,399, while the upper-tier version with the 2.3GHz 8-core Core i9, 1TB of storage, a Radeon Pro 5500M 4GB GPU, and the same amount of memory is $2,799.For the XPS 15, Dell has five starting configuration options. On the low end is the $1,299.99, which sports 8GB of memory, 256GB of storage, the Core i5 processor option, the non-touch display, the 56WHr battery, and no discrete graphics option.
Moving up one stage adds in the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti 4GB, the upper-size 86WHr battery, and switches the processor to the six-core Core i7 at $1,749.99. The $2,199.99 model brings the RAM up to 16GB, the storage up to 512GB, and introduces the touch-enabled display.
The second most expensive model of the range is priced at $2,299.99, with the extra $100 increasing the storage to 1 terabyte. At the highest is the $2,449.99 model, which adds more memory to the equation, bringing it up to 32 gigabytes.
Pricing for all tiers of the XPS 17 has yet to be detailed, but the range is expected to start from $1,499.99.
The Dell XPS 15
The XPS 15 seems like the better deal looking at the lower end of things, albeit without comparable specifications to the lowest Apple offers. The equivalent would be the middle option of the five XPS 15 starting points, but even the $2,199.99 price is still practically $100 cheaper than the MacBook Pro.
Moving to the heavier end of the ranges, the MacBook Pro using the highest processor option 64GB of memory, the Radeon Pro 5500M with 8GB of GDDR6 memory, and 2 terabytes of storage works out to be $4,299, with further room to go to 8 terabytes for $6,099.
Maxing out the Dell XPS 15 configurator with the best processor, 64GB of memory, the highest 2TB capacity option, the higher-resolution touch-enabled display, and the bigger battery brings the price up to $3,049.
For comparable high-specification models, this seems like Dell is the better deal, even taking into account the XPS 17 will cost a few hundred more to account for the larger display.
XPS 15 and XPS 17 vs 16-inch MacBook Pro - Upgradability
As a notebook ages, or the user's workload increases, there's usually a need to upgrade some of its components. More RAM may help increase performance, while replacing the storage could help give it a higher capacity.After-market upgrades also allow users to get around the potentially high cost of selecting better components at the time of purchase, by putting their own separately-sourced and cheaper version in place of the cheapest version offered by the manufacturer.
Plainly speaking, Apple doesn't let users perform after-market upgrades. Neither the memory nor the storage are user-accessible after purchase, so they cannot be replaced or added to at all.
While the storage could be supplemented by an external Thunderbolt drive or network storage, there isn't such a workaround for the memory. You're stuck with whatever RAM value you agreed to at the time of purchase.
This also means that, if you wanted to have a MacBook Pro with a higher storage capacity and more memory down the line, you're going to be shelling out for those upgrades from the outset, and at Apple's pricing. Or alternately buying a brand new model.
Unlike Apple, Dell makes its notebooks user-serviceable, with upgrade options available post-purchase for both memory and storage. There are a pair of memory slots, two M.2 spaces, and even the battery can be replaced once it grows old, without needing to send it off for servicing.
This does mean that a user with the right knowhow can change the memory and RAM straight away after receiving the notebook. Down the road, upgrades are still going to be possible, and could be made in line with the user's actual needs at that time.
A close battle that could change with a refresh
It's plain to see that Dell is keeping up with the MacBook Pro hardware with its own notebooks. It's also fairly obvious that Dell is providing considerable value for money with its XPS 15 when directly compared against the 16-inch MacBook Pro.The XPS 15 is smaller but thicker than the MacBook Pro, but while the low-end models are underwhelming performance and specifications-wise, it's a fair bit cheaper to go for Dell's equivalent on a roughly comparable configuration. Dell's 4K-resolution screen and touch capabilities are also attractive elements that the MacBook Pro simply cannot match at this time.
You're also afforded the ability to actually upgrade and replace some components of the XPS range, which you simply cannot with the MacBook Pro.
Apple does pull away with several wins, such as its audio capabilities, larger battery, generally better graphics with the exception of the RTX GPU, and starts users off with 16 gigabytes of memory instead of 8 gigabytes. You also have the unexpected benefit on the 16-inch MacBook Pro of having more ports to use than the XPS 15, though the position is reversed for the XPS 17.
Also bear in mind that the MacBook Pro also has macOS, a secure operating system that many creatives and power users will be familiar with. Sure, you could use Windows on the Dell or move onto a Linux distribution if you need to, but if you want Windows and macOS, the only way to do that in a notebook officially is to get the MacBook Pro.
The 16-inch MacBook Pro's chips are a full generation behind the XPS 15's tenth-generation processors, and even with similar core counts and clock speeds, the newer generation processors are simply better chips.
A simple solution for Apple to overtake Dell in this front is to simply use newer processors and GPUs, potentially as part of an annual refresh that has so far not taken place for the 16-inch model. It would be expected that Apple would follow what it did with the 13-inch MacBook Pro in May with similar tenth-generation processor and GPU upgrades.
If Apple does such a product line refresh, it would once more give the 16-inch MacBook Pro the upper hand over its Dell rivals. All it needs is for Apple to actually make the upgrade.
Comments
You mean Dell is using Comet Lake processors, not Ice Lake. Comet Lake-U and Comet Lake-H are basically further binned Coffee Lake processors fabbed on Intel 14 nm. Intel has long been at the point of getting more performance by using more Watts on 14 nm. So if these are more performant at all, it's because they are using more power than Coffee Lake processors.
As well, unlike the XPS 15, the 17 uses vapor chamber cooling that is said to be an excellent system.
I'd also add that there are the Precision versions of both of these laptops, the 5550 and the 5570.
These can be equipped with up to the Intel Xeon W-10855M (15") / Intel Xeon W-10885M (17"), 64 GB DDR4 ECC, and a Quadro T2000 (15") / Quadro RTX 3000 (17"). They also have optional 5 year next business day onsite service warranties.
We’ve made the additions.
Yep. I've replaced the wifi card in my Dell XPS 9550 twice. Most people won't, but it's a $20 upgrade and now I have WiFi 6 in a 2016 laptop. It was also nice when a battery recall was user-replaceable.
It is a cross-platform world, now more than it has been in the last decade. More knowledge is better than less.
I'd also be surprised if their preinstalled software didn't phone home with such telemetry. But in either case, I would expect the number to be rather under-reported. Enterprise is likely on a refresh schedule and wouldn't bother, and the non-enterprise people who are likely to upgrade such things are also prone to nuking and reinstalling a clean OS.
Industrial design includes things like the thermal design, asymmetrically spaced impeller blades in their blowers that produce a more pleasing white noise, the Touch Bar, the keyboard feel, the coolness (temperature) of aluminum, Thunderbolt ports, 5K and 6K display support, left-right symmetry, slipper glass haptic trackpads, the levelness and clean lines, etc.
These 2020 XPS models look like they adjusted the plastic+aluminum sandwich industrial design of older models. The industrial design was really a plastic body with metal top and bottom plates. At least they look like metal, not sure. It looks like it still has a plastic "top" part in the base, where your hands would rest. It's not a unibody style design either. So, maybe the biggest change was the bottom plate and the sides being one piece now. The interior is basically straight Apple layout and packaging. It looks like it draws air in from the bottom through grills on the left and blows it out through the rear edge. Someone should check on how this affects cooling if those grills are covered. I assume air will be drawn in from the side slots like in Apple's design (which is also where the audio goes out).
Good to see that they moved to 16:10 aspect ratio on the display. Also, it has a huge trackpads like Apple's 4th gen MBP models. While people may not be able to precisely elucidate why this or that industrial design is "better", they certainly can tell at a gestalt level. The hardware is important. The chip or feature set comparisons are often Charlie Brown-esque adult speak, but the emotional connection of good industrial design will be there as they can see it, feel it.
As for Apple, the shoes will hopefully drop on the ARM Macs soon. That's when they can finally start moving away from the unibody aluminum and glass industrial design that has been so mimicked in PC laptops for a long long time now. These Intel 14 nm chips are really an embarrassment. If you read laptopmag.com 2019 XPS 15 review, there is a horrifying statement:
https://www.laptopmag.com/reviews/laptops/dell-xps-15-2019
This is pure doublespeak shit as far as I tell. 88 °F on the touchpad is cool? 95 °F is their "comfort" threshold? 102 °F is "warm"? Those are insane criteria. The 10th gen Comet Lake-H chips will run hotter. It does look like Dell has redesigned the thermal design, so hopefully these types of numbers will be cooler with the 2020 models.
Crash reports, service reports, end of life reports, etc. They just need to get a representative sample. Eg, they provide service for 1% of the laptops. That 1% is enough data (what, 2 million laptops that are serviced?) will be enough to say what percentage of users install after-market parts for the population at large.
Internally, these are modular and user serviceable. Not at all like a MacBook Pro.
That's not plastic, it's carbon fibre.
Dave Lee had a nice hands on with early engineering samples (this is not his full review, that's still to come):
He described the XPS 17's vapor chamber cooling solution as very impressive.
Anybody smart enough to upgrade the SSD or RAM is smart enough to avoid using substandard but over priced OEM crap. You only get pushed into that if its a Mac.