why even post my own reply when mulatt sums it all up for me
Summarize? I think you mean simplify.
Quote:
Originally posted by Matsu
Are they counted? Whoa, that's different then, but not what I read, must check. Counted by whom, the PGA? If so, we've got a whole new game then because I believe the PGA only offically supports unisex clubs. Hmmm...
We need an avid golf afficionado to clear this up prease?
Is it prohibited discrimination? There's probably more legal room for manouver than you let on, since this now gets into a whole other host of arbitrary stipulations, like the number.
And where does it leave religious groups? Some of whom easily hav more than 400 members and DO conduct some pretty big business, yt by definition discriminate on the basis of religion?
It considers them as official events and counts money earned toward the PGA Tour money list. Winners of the four majors received a five-year exemption on tour.
Comments
Originally posted by ast3r3x
why even post my own reply when mulatt sums it all up for me
Summarize? I think you mean simplify.
Originally posted by Matsu
Are they counted? Whoa, that's different then, but not what I read, must check. Counted by whom, the PGA? If so, we've got a whole new game then because I believe the PGA only offically supports unisex clubs. Hmmm...
We need an avid golf afficionado to clear this up prease?
Is it prohibited discrimination? There's probably more legal room for manouver than you let on, since this now gets into a whole other host of arbitrary stipulations, like the number.
And where does it leave religious groups? Some of whom easily hav more than 400 members and DO conduct some pretty big business, yt by definition discriminate on the basis of religion?
Very interesting...
I've been saying that all along.
AP article in the Pittsburg Post-Gazette: PGA sticking with Masters
It considers them as official events and counts money earned toward the PGA Tour money list. Winners of the four majors received a five-year exemption on tour.