Apple Intelligence vs Grammarly -- AI powered text tool showdown

Posted:
in iOS

Apple Intelligence provides iOS 18 and macOS Sequoia users with new AI-driven tools to improve their writing. Here's how it compares against the current market favorite, Grammarly.

Laptop displaying an email and resume beside a smartphone showing a document, all under a large Grammarly logo on a grid background.
Apple Intelligence's Writing Tools [left], Grammarly logo [right]



It's fair to say that Apple Intelligence is a big jump for Apple, in many different ways. After living with Siri for years, users are being promised a seismic shift in how their hardware works, with more intelligent features than ever before.

The imaging capabilities have gathered the most attention so far, with Siri's upgrades a close second. However, there's a lot to be said about the text tools included as part of Apple Intelligence.

The average person will be familiar to in-app tools to help correct spelling, grammar issues, and maybe a little guidance on readability. By contrast, Apple Intelligence offers a lot more, including rewriting stretches of text.

All of this is a bid to improve the user's writing for others to read.

The features are not the only literacy aids available, as tools like Grammarly have offered similar promises to upgrade a user's writing. Grammarly similarly provides AI-powered tools to correct and improve how a user writes.

As Apple Intelligence's writing tools are available in developer betas, and months away from a public launch, it's worth looking at whether Apple is going to consume Grammarly's subscribers.

Apple Intelligence vs Grammarly - Basic Checks



Everyone is very familiar with the underlines that appear in text if you make a spelling or grammatical error. These usually appear in specific writing tools and can be the bane of writers.

These corrective notices aren't always useful, such as if the user accidentally types in a homophone. Traditional spellcheckers probably won't detect the wrong word choice if a user types "their" instead of "there," as they're both correctly spelled words.

That's where tools like Grammarly step in. Once installed and enabled, Grammarly can hint to a user that there are problems in a stretch of text, but does more than a typical spellcheck.

Grammarly suggestion popup to change a sentence from 'there's a lot to' to 'much can' in a text editor.
Apple Intelligence vs Grammarly - An example of a Grammarly correction in macOS



That includes detecting things like homophones and other writing confusions, and offering corrections in each case. When it comes to grammar, it will also provide its own take on what you're trying to write, all shown as pop-ups overlaying your text.

Apple Intelligence doesn't have this function directly. You're still going to have to rely on an app's built-in spellcheck if you want in-line indications of your mistakes.

However, where Apple Intelligence comes into play is if you highlight text and tap Writing Tools. This brings up the Apple Intelligence Writing Tools popup, which includes an option to Proofread.

Text document with proofreading and rewriting tool interface, highlighting spelling errors such as 'biig' and 'thee'.
Apple Intelligence vs Grammarly - The Writing Tools of Apple Intelligence



Tapping Proofread then has Apple Intelligence analyze the text and display a corrected version in the pop-up. You don't get the option to see what exact mistakes you made, but it does correct them for you.

This text isn't automatically inserted into your document, but you do have options to copy, replace inline, or to share the corrected stretch with others.

Apple Intelligence vs Grammarly - Style and AI rewriting



Writing in a particular tone of voice can be hard. Not everyone can easily switch from a conversational style to something more formal.

Both Apple Intelligence and Grammarly offer ways to automatically alter the text to suit the tone you need.

Under Apple Intelligence Writing Tools, there are options to update the selected portion of text in friendly, professional, and concise ways. Much like proofreading this will bring the selected text into the popup and display a version in that particular style.

A digital document editor shows paragraphs of text about Apple Intelligence and a sidebar suggesting text rewrites. The editor interface includes text formatting tools.
Apple Intelligence vs Grammarly - Rewriting text using Apple Intelligence



If you would rather maintain your current style but feel it could be done better, you could instead select Rewrite. Again, it will display new text based on what you have selected, which can be inserted in place.

For Grammarly, it does offer some generative tone changes. Clicking a little icon in macOS brings up an option for improving the text, identifying gaps in what you've written, and so forth.

Setting your desired tone in Grammarly
Apple Intelligence vs Grammarly - Setting your desired tone in Grammarly



However, you can also "Set your voice," referring to your tone. This is a lot more extensive than the few options of Apple Intelligence, but it does start with the fairly similar formality options of neutral, casual, or formal.

When it comes to tone, you can select three from a list of six options: personable, confident, empathetic, engaging, witty, and direct.

You can even include your profession, just in case there's profession-specific terminology or writing style to consider.

Apple Intelligence vs Grammarly - Generating text



If you had no idea where to start or a bad bout of writer's block, you could ask Grammarly to write something for you. You simply tell it what you want written and it will craft a block of text in your chosen style.

For example, asking for a thank you note offers a very usable stretch of text, with fill-in-the-blank sections included where necessary.

Note-taking application with a list of notes on the left and a Grammarly window on the right, suggesting a thank you note to Mom. Background features a gradient color.
Apple Intelligence vs Grammarly - Generating a thank you note's text in Grammarly



Apple Intelligence doesn't offer text generation directly. You can't tell it to create a block of text on a topic at all.

The nearest thing to it on the way is Smart Reply in Mail. When requested, Apple Intelligence will determine questions asked in an email and offer appropriate response options to the user.

It then uses these responses to create a quick reply to the email, which the user can then further adjust and send off.

As usual for any generated AI text, it is best practice to proofread it yourself before actively using it in a document.

Apple Intelligence vs Grammarly - Other assists



Apple Intelligence offers options to summarize stretches of text, to generate a list of key points, and even make a table if a bunch of data points is selected by the user.

Similarly, Grammarly does give other quick options, including shortening the text, adding more descriptions, simplifying text, and other tone tweaks.

Apple Intelligence vs Grammarly - Accessibility



As the name implies, Apple Intelligence is only available on Apple hardware. For the moment, that means the iPhone 15 Pro and iPhone 15 Pro Max, as well as Mac and iPad models with M-series Apple Silicon chips.

It's also a system-wide feature, so it will work with most apps, including third-party apps, that deal with text.

Grammarly, meanwhile, is available on Mac and Windows for desktop, iOS and Android on mobile. It also has add-ons for browsers, in case you don't want to install the full desktop versions.

When installed on the Mac desktop, you get the little icon in the corner of the window if you're typing in a text-based app. On mobile, you can use the Grammarly Editor app, as well as the keyboard to assist while writing in other apps.

Apple Intelligence vs Grammarly - Pricing



Apple Intelligence is free as part of the iOS 18, iPadOS 18, and macOS Sequoia update, which will be released to the public this fall.

While there's no price associated with it directly for writing tools, you do need the hardware to use it. For example, if you're on an older non-Pro iPhone, you're going to have to upgrade.

Grammarly does offer a free edition of its service to consumers, but it is limited to more basic spelling and grammar checking. You can also be told the tone of your writing, but you cannot adjust it.

You can also use the generative text elements, but you can submit just 100 prompts per month.

There is a premium option, which costs $12 per month when billed annually or $30 per month when billed monthly. Under premium, you get full access to Grammarly's feature set, including adjusting your writing tone, rewriting full sentences, and monitoring for plagarism.

You also get more prompts at 1,000 per month.

A Business option is also available for $15 per member per month when billed annually, or $25 per month when billed monthly. This introduces centralized billing, style guides, brand tone adjustments, analytics, more prompts, and other things beneficial to working in teams.

Apple Intelligence vs Grammarly - Semi-Sherlocked



If all you heard was that Apple Intelligence offered AI tools to assist in writing text, you would expect the worst for Grammarly. At face value, it seems like a case of Grammarly being Sherlocked, when Apple introduces a free feature that replaces a third-party app.

It's fair to say that this isn't a Sherlocking case. At least, not entirely.

Apple Intelligence certainly does bring some much-needed tools to the table for Apple users. It will help people improve their writing, and maybe even boost grades for children.

But the initial offering isn't all-encompassing. You're not asking your iPhone to write a book report automatically for you, or at least to generate birthday greeting emails to friends and family.

Improving a stretch of text in Grammarly
Improving a stretch of text in Grammarly



Grammarly offers an awful lot more to users if they want a lot more finessing of their text. You're given a lot more flexibility in terms of tone adjustments.

Then there's the generative AI element that can write text for you. Apple doesn't offer this at all, though the Siri connection to ChatGPT could eventually do so.

And that's before you consider that Apple Intelligence is only available if you're on Apple Silicon on a Mac or iPad, or you have an iPhone 15 Pro or later. Grammarly is offered on far more, and on other platforms too.

Where Grammarly runs into a problem is cost. It's hard enough to compete with "free and built-in," but the subscription price could put off all but those who write for a living.

Apple's new writing tools have a massive audience, namely people who want occasional help to straighten up their paragraphs. Grammarly's audience is for people who need a lot more specialized assistance.

Grammarly's existence is still safe. It's not been Sherlocked, and it will be fine for the moment.

At least, until Apple expands the capabilities of its tools down the road.



Read on AppleInsider

Luis.A.Masanti

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 20
    The article says it’s will work with the M series chips but does this include an M1? I seem to recall reading somewhere that M1s could not handle Apple Intelligence. 
  • Reply 2 of 20
    Mike WuertheleMike Wuerthele Posts: 6,908administrator
    The article says it’s will work with the M series chips but does this include an M1? I seem to recall reading somewhere that M1s could not handle Apple Intelligence. 
    It does include M1.
    appleinsideruser
  • Reply 3 of 20
    Other than sending out form letters, I really don’t get the appeal of having AI write for someone.
    jas99dewmewilliamlondonM68000
  • Reply 4 of 20
    eriamjheriamjh Posts: 1,711member
    Other than sending out form letters, I really don’t get the appeal of having AI write for someone.
    Have you seen some of the article writing on websites out there that ISN'T bot generated?  

    There may be just as many people who hate writing an article or email as there are that don't like to make phone calls or talk in person.  Social anxiety to the max!
  • Reply 5 of 20
    bluefire1bluefire1 Posts: 1,308member
    I was planning on trading in my 14 Pro for the 16 Pro, but if AI is going to take a long time to roll out, I’m thinking of just waiting for the 17 Pro when it will be fully embedded in the device.  Thoughts?
  • Reply 6 of 20
    gregoriusmgregoriusm Posts: 517member
    bluefire1 said:
    I was planning on trading in my 14 Pro for the 16 Pro, but if AI is going to take a long time to roll out, I’m thinking of just waiting for the 17 Pro when it will be fully embedded in the device.  Thoughts?
    I am waiting for the 17 Pro. Just to be sure, since a lot of the Apple Intelligence won’t be out until sometime in 2025 anyway. 
  • Reply 7 of 20
    22july201322july2013 Posts: 3,676member
    I would never use a product (like Grammarly) that requires sending my text to a remote site, possibly even in another country, and let the people who work there or the company itself take advantage of the information in my text to profile me or sell me products based on my words (how safe are my credit card numbers if they appear in the text?)

    Apple's solution is approximately 100% secure, (I would even say Apple's "Private Cloud Compute" is 100% secure) since Apple cannot gain access to your data even with a government warrant. Until proven otherwise, I will assume Grammarly is 0% secure. There is no comparison between these two products. There shouldn't even be an article written comparing the functionality of these two products because they work on entirely different privacy premises. It's somewhat like comparing the quality of a disposable camera with a permanent camera - what's the usefulness in that? They are completely different products. In this case, one product is for people who care about privacy, and the other product is for people who don't.

    I have seen 100 ads for Grammarly this year, and not a single one touted any respect for my privacy.
    edited July 30 danox
  • Reply 8 of 20
    My guess is that the enhanced version which Sherlocks "Grammarly" will be part of an iCloud subscription. Of course that will likely be deemed anti-competitive by the EU  so the EU will miss out on this feature and then complain that missing out is anti-competitive!  :D
    danox
  • Reply 9 of 20
    danoxdanox Posts: 3,211member
    bluefire1 said:
    I was planning on trading in my 14 Pro for the 16 Pro, but if AI is going to take a long time to roll out, I’m thinking of just waiting for the 17 Pro when it will be fully embedded in the device.  Thoughts?
    Do you have a M1 Mac computer or a M1 iPad Pro if so you don't need to upgrade your iPhone it still works and the other two devices support Apple Intelligence? Owner of a M2 Mac Studio and a new M4 iPad Pro and a 11 Pro iPhone.
    edited July 30
  • Reply 10 of 20
    cjlaczcjlacz Posts: 46member
    Didn’t even read this. Can you please stop presenting early betas as some kind of final product review?
    edited July 30 mac_dogwilliamlondon
  • Reply 11 of 20
    Congrats! Excellent article.

    Just a couple of clarifications that I need.

    1— Apple Intelligence will not ‘create text.’ And this is ‘by design,’ similar to the decision to not generate realistic images.

    2— The description of Grammarly's prices talks about ‘prompts.’
    That makes me thing that the AI processing is made in Grammarly servers.

    In Apple Intelligence the processing is made in the device, or in the Personal Cloud Compute with data transmitted encrypted and erased after use, and only in ChatGPT goes —with restrictions— to external servers.
    I have no clue of what are the server processing conditions… if they occur… for Grammarly.

    One thing that most certainly Apple Intelligence will… almost… never have is the ‘business’ level for style and/or brand style. I think it will be… at least for 5-10 years… just ‘personal.’
    Also… I have no idea how Grammarly manage plagiarism. 
  • Reply 12 of 20
    coolfactorcoolfactor Posts: 2,314member
    I wouldn't subscribe to Grammarly on its own, particularly since the interface appears to be somewhat non-native. That always grinds me. But I would subscribe to Grammarly if it was an add-on for Apple Intelligence. That's the greatest opportunity for Apple .. enabling its intelligence feature to be a gateway to the wealth of third-party providers.
  • Reply 13 of 20
    firelockfirelock Posts: 241member
    Thank you for the article. Exactly what I wanted someone to write as I have been contemplating purchasing Grammarly Pro for personal use. I already use Pro at work and find it extremely useful, but was wondering if AI would give me the same features for free. Sounds like Pro is still worth it for a someone who is not just a casual writer.
  • Reply 14 of 20
    Fidonet127Fidonet127 Posts: 557member
    My Apple Intelligence still shows preparing since the beta came out. Long wait list or did it get stuck?
    williamlondon
  • Reply 15 of 20
    gatorguygatorguy Posts: 24,513member
    I'm using Language Tool, along with the very occasional "Google Help Me Write". Until somewhat I was a Grammarly subscriber, even if never completely comfortable with them. In fact I had turned the extension off, only enabling when I was writing longer responses, particularly business related, giving Language Tools a fair test. Thanks to some other comments here I've cut the Grammarly relationship completely now.

    Like Apple, the free Language Tools doesn't log and store any text I enter. Google, for it's part, pops up a warning not to enter credit card or SS numbers in Help Me Write. The two serve different purposes for me, and both services are working very well. 
    edited July 31
  • Reply 16 of 20
    caskeycaskey Posts: 35member
    cjlacz said:
    Didn’t even read this. Can you please stop presenting early betas as some kind of final product review?
    If this was People magazine, I'd understand your point. However, this is Apple Insider...INSIDER being the key word. Apple Intelligence is the biggest development to come out of Apple software in years, of course a blog for dedicated Apple fanatics is going to do a "first look" at a new feature when it comes out. It is mentioned several times in the article that this is new and Beta and not complete, but it's not insane for them to give a summary of a new feature when people finally have access to it and Apple opening up the developer Beta to anyone makes it very widespread and newsworthy.
    williamlondonFidonet127jib
  • Reply 17 of 20
    M68000M68000 Posts: 827member
    Other than sending out form letters, I really don’t get the appeal of having AI write for someone.
    I’m already tired of the hype.
  • Reply 18 of 20
    CheeseFreezeCheeseFreeze Posts: 1,318member
    But Grammarly IS in trouble though when both Microsoft and Apple are building competing features on an operating system level! It’s “Sherlocked/Redmonted”.

    Even if Apple Intelligence does 60-70% of what Grammarly does today, it provides a service out of the box, running locally without connection to the internet, solving for people’s primary use-cases.

    People who adapt Apple Intelligence and never used Granmarly before will never ‘miss’ the 30-40% because they never experienced this portion in the first place. 
    As Apple keeps improving and adding on to it, people grow accustom to having it out of the box, never seeking a commercialized version.

    My guess is that it will immediately hurt new customers (acquisition) in 2025 and over a longer period of time will hurt customer retention also.
  • Reply 19 of 20
    timmilleatimmillea Posts: 250member
    I am dyslexic. When I was an academic, forever having to write papers for publication, I relied heavily on others to proof-read my papers. I am hoping that this update will take their place. Common errors I make, apart from not being able to spell longer words, are putting two or three letters and even words in the wrong order, missing out words because my mind is already on the next then, when I read it, I cannot see the errors but merely read what I intended to write. Of course simple spell-checking catches most of the letter order errors but not when the mistake is also a correct word! Grammar checking is also useful but not infallible and missing out a word such as "not" completely changes the meaning of what I wrote. I hope Apple will add a dyslexic mode in future. 
    muthuk_vanalingam
  • Reply 20 of 20
    123Go123Go Posts: 20member
    I would never use a product (like Grammarly) that requires sending my text to a remote site, possibly even in another country, and let the people who work there or the company itself take advantage of the information in my text to profile me or sell me products based on my words (how safe are my credit card numbers if they appear in the text?)

    Apple's solution is approximately 100% secure, (I would even say Apple's "Private Cloud Compute" is 100% secure) since Apple cannot gain access to your data even with a government warrant. Until proven otherwise, I will assume Grammarly is 0% secure. There is no comparison between these two products. There shouldn't even be an article written comparing the functionality of these two products because they work on entirely different privacy premises. It's somewhat like comparing the quality of a disposable camera with a permanent camera - what's the usefulness in that? They are completely different products. In this case, one product is for people who care about privacy, and the other product is for people who don't.

    I have seen 100 ads for Grammarly this year, and not a single one touted any respect for my privacy.
    I 100% Agree. I cannot use Grammarly as it stores and processes your data on a sever. 
Sign In or Register to comment.