Trump vs. Harris: How to watch the September 10 Presidential debate online

13»

Comments

  • Reply 41 of 45
    XedXed Posts: 2,806member
    AppleZulu said:
    ilarynx said:
    After the debate, the question on everyone's minds is

    WHO WILL SAVE US FROM THE STORMING HARDS OF CAT EATERS??!!?!1??
    While on the surface, the pet-eating story seems comically like a b@tsh*t crazy, delusional old-man rant, there is a reason this particular falsehood was trafficked earlier by neo-Nazis. This is a proverbial racist dog-whistle, trying to paint a scary picture about Haitian migrants running rampant through lily-white suburbs. As with many of Trump's weird rants, often when they seem so bizarre, it's because he's not actually talking to you. He's talking to his base, which is primed to pick up on meanings you're not even thinking about. While you hear a crazy rant, they hear the Great White Hope (behind a layer of orange bronzer) who will save them from those people.
    While it did seem crazy and desperate folks tried to use that to cast a villainous hue upon the messenger, it has proven to be TRUE. All over the news. It is difficult to be wrong but when you are, it’s time to simply own it. Just like those who pretended Hilary Clinton didn’t receive advance debate question notice of from cnn. For the record, I thought Kamala Harris did a good job of posing, using facial expressions, promising free money to everyone, and making stuff up. So she won the style portion. And Donald J Trump did a good job of honestly answering the uesyions, despite arguments from moderators (who refused to argue with his opponent), and poking massive holes in Harris’ flip-flop facade. He won the substance portion.
    You are the poster child for "you can fool some of the people all of the time." I actually feel sorry for you. It's sad to think these weak ass cons and lies control your life so completely.
    edited September 15 spheric9secondkox2muthuk_vanalingamronn
  • Reply 42 of 45
    sphericspheric Posts: 2,663member
    AppleZulu said:
    ilarynx said:
    After the debate, the question on everyone's minds is

    WHO WILL SAVE US FROM THE STORMING HARDS OF CAT EATERS??!!?!1??



    While on the surface, the pet-eating story seems comically like a b@tsh*t crazy, delusional old-man rant, there is a reason this particular falsehood was trafficked earlier by neo-Nazis. This is a proverbial racist dog-whistle, trying to paint a scary picture about Haitian migrants running rampant through lily-white suburbs. As with many of Trump's weird rants, often when they seem so bizarre, it's because he's not actually talking to you. He's talking to his base, which is primed to pick up on meanings you're not even thinking about. While you hear a crazy rant, they hear the Great White Hope (behind a layer of orange bronzer) who will save them from those people.
    While it did seem crazy and desperate folks tried to use that to cast a villainous hue upon the messenger, it has proven to be TRUE. All over the news.
    You are either a liar or very, very easy to dupe with the dumbest of lies. 
    9secondkox2muthuk_vanalingamronn
  • Reply 43 of 45
    Xed said:
    AppleZulu said:
    ilarynx said:
    After the debate, the question on everyone's minds is

    WHO WILL SAVE US FROM THE STORMING HARDS OF CAT EATERS??!!?!1??
    While on the surface, the pet-eating story seems comically like a b@tsh*t crazy, delusional old-man rant, there is a reason this particular falsehood was trafficked earlier by neo-Nazis. This is a proverbial racist dog-whistle, trying to paint a scary picture about Haitian migrants running rampant through lily-white suburbs. As with many of Trump's weird rants, often when they seem so bizarre, it's because he's not actually talking to you. He's talking to his base, which is primed to pick up on meanings you're not even thinking about. While you hear a crazy rant, they hear the Great White Hope (behind a layer of orange bronzer) who will save them from those people.
    While it did seem crazy and desperate folks tried to use that to cast a villainous hue upon the messenger, it has proven to be TRUE. All over the news. It is difficult to be wrong but when you are, it’s time to simply own it. Just like those who pretended Hilary Clinton didn’t receive advance debate question notice of from cnn. For the record, I thought Kamala Harris did a good job of posing, using facial expressions, promising free money to everyone, and making stuff up. So she won the style portion. And Donald J Trump did a good job of honestly answering the uesyions, despite arguments from moderators (who refused to argue with his opponent), and poking massive holes in Harris’ flip-flop facade. He won the substance portion.
    You are the poster child for "you can fool some of the people all of the time." I actually feel sorry for you. It's sad to think these weak ass cons and lies control your life so completely.
    It’s called … the real world. Unfortunately. If you’d exit your echo chamber once in a while, you’d learn some things about the world. But I get it. The fairly tale really is better. 
  • Reply 44 of 45
    XedXed Posts: 2,806member
    Xed said:
    AppleZulu said:
    ilarynx said:
    After the debate, the question on everyone's minds is

    WHO WILL SAVE US FROM THE STORMING HARDS OF CAT EATERS??!!?!1??
    While on the surface, the pet-eating story seems comically like a b@tsh*t crazy, delusional old-man rant, there is a reason this particular falsehood was trafficked earlier by neo-Nazis. This is a proverbial racist dog-whistle, trying to paint a scary picture about Haitian migrants running rampant through lily-white suburbs. As with many of Trump's weird rants, often when they seem so bizarre, it's because he's not actually talking to you. He's talking to his base, which is primed to pick up on meanings you're not even thinking about. While you hear a crazy rant, they hear the Great White Hope (behind a layer of orange bronzer) who will save them from those people.
    While it did seem crazy and desperate folks tried to use that to cast a villainous hue upon the messenger, it has proven to be TRUE. All over the news. It is difficult to be wrong but when you are, it’s time to simply own it. Just like those who pretended Hilary Clinton didn’t receive advance debate question notice of from cnn. For the record, I thought Kamala Harris did a good job of posing, using facial expressions, promising free money to everyone, and making stuff up. So she won the style portion. And Donald J Trump did a good job of honestly answering the uesyions, despite arguments from moderators (who refused to argue with his opponent), and poking massive holes in Harris’ flip-flop facade. He won the substance portion.
    You are the poster child for "you can fool some of the people all of the time." I actually feel sorry for you. It's sad to think these weak ass cons and lies control your life so completely.
    It’s called … the real world. Unfortunately. If you’d exit your echo chamber once in a while, you’d learn some things about the world. But I get it. The fairly tale really is better. 
    Good one. 🙄
    ronn
  • Reply 45 of 45
    sphericspheric Posts: 2,663member
    Xed said:
    AppleZulu said:
    ilarynx said:
    After the debate, the question on everyone's minds is

    WHO WILL SAVE US FROM THE STORMING HARDS OF CAT EATERS??!!?!1??
    While on the surface, the pet-eating story seems comically like a b@tsh*t crazy, delusional old-man rant, there is a reason this particular falsehood was trafficked earlier by neo-Nazis. This is a proverbial racist dog-whistle, trying to paint a scary picture about Haitian migrants running rampant through lily-white suburbs. As with many of Trump's weird rants, often when they seem so bizarre, it's because he's not actually talking to you. He's talking to his base, which is primed to pick up on meanings you're not even thinking about. While you hear a crazy rant, they hear the Great White Hope (behind a layer of orange bronzer) who will save them from those people.
    While it did seem crazy and desperate folks tried to use that to cast a villainous hue upon the messenger, it has proven to be TRUE. All over the news. It is difficult to be wrong but when you are, it’s time to simply own it. Just like those who pretended Hilary Clinton didn’t receive advance debate question notice of from cnn. For the record, I thought Kamala Harris did a good job of posing, using facial expressions, promising free money to everyone, and making stuff up. So she won the style portion. And Donald J Trump did a good job of honestly answering the uesyions, despite arguments from moderators (who refused to argue with his opponent), and poking massive holes in Harris’ flip-flop facade. He won the substance portion.
    You are the poster child for "you can fool some of the people all of the time." I actually feel sorry for you. It's sad to think these weak ass cons and lies control your life so completely.
    It’s called … the real world. Unfortunately. If you’d exit your echo chamber once in a while, you’d learn some things about the world. But I get it. The fairly tale really is better. 
    You’re the one repeating a proven lie. 
    ronn
Sign In or Register to comment.