It's all so clear now. I'm surprised I didn't remember.
You'll have to take number giant. I'm currently scheduled to be under Brussle's bed and after that I have to be al Dajjal's boogie man. I might be able to be your vaporous apparition on the 31st of this month, but you'll have to furnish your own peyote.
You'll have to take number giant. I'm currently scheduled to be under Brussle's bed and after that I have to be al Dajjal's boogie man. I might be able to be your vaporous apparition on the 31st of this month, but you'll have to furnish your own peyote.
see. that was excatly your response when you changed your name after completely losing it. Then one of the mods pointed out that it actually was you.
I think there is a functionality to the restraints connected to the Jewish/Christian/Islamic/(even some "primitive" cultures) way of approaching marriage. Much in the same way that property rights give property value and make us want to "take care" of what we own. I think when you more of less sanction free love, then you end up with an unsustainable situation on a lot of different levels.
The thing with the culture transplant in the US is pretty complicated, but in the end the sexual revolution might have been more of a byproduct of the shift of the "Man under God/Justice as law" to the "Man as a crature of the state/Law to promote order" paradigm.
Without quoting any one sacred text or (Dena'ina tribal wisdom), most religions pretty much promise disaster with the marginalization of "the family".
Then one of the mods pointed out that it actually was you.
I'd rather hear that from the mods. I'm not certain there is way of conclusivly telling who is who on these boards. If that is true, then I think you might be getting angry and calling me names (agian). Trying to discredit me was amusing at first but, if you don't like what I say, maybe you shouldn't read my posts.
I think there is a functionality to the restraints connected to the Jewish/Christian/Islamic/(even some "primitive" cultures) way of approaching marriage. Much in the same way that property rights give property value and make us want to "take care" of what we own. I think when you more of less sanction free love, then you end up with an unsustainable situation on a lot of different levels.
The thing with the culture transplant in the US is pretty complicated, but in the end the sexual revolution might have been more of a byproduct of the shift of the "Man under God/Justice as law" to the "Man as a crature of the state/Law to promote order" paradigm.
Without quoting any one sacred text or (Dena'ina tribal wisdom), most religions pretty much promise disaster with the marginalization of "the family".
Let me put that through the bullshit filter and here is what we come up with.
Quote:
De-bullshitified Akso/Ena says:
My way or the highway. I'm a nosey fvck and cannot handle views different from mine which leads me to want to enforce change on society so that they adapt to my archaic, bigoted way of thinking. I think this idea stems from the time I spent that winter alone in the igloo without other human contact and that baby seal started looking a lot like anna nicole smith and well one thing led to another and now i'm a militant christian family values man as a result.
The society deciding what I use my money for is equiliant to the society deciding what I use my body for. Only difference is that I consider the body much more personally than my money and thus something much more importent for me to control.
Ah yes, "free love"--it makes keeping a concubine so much easier if you get rid of one word and call it something else.
Quote:
Main Entrytcon·cu·bine
Pronunciationt'kä[ng]-kyu-"bIn, 'kän-
Functiontnoun
EtymologytMiddle English, from Middle French, from Latin concubina, from com- + cubare to lie
Datet14th century
: a woman with whom a man cohabits without being married: as a : one having a recognized social status in a household below that of a wife b : MISTRESS 4a
On a societal level homosexuality is a suicidal impulse. Some cultures recognize this fact and militate against it. There are revelational morality issues, don't get me wrong, but all viable cultures protect their core (sometimes it's the family, sometimes its the state). One of the ways homosexuality attacks a culture's existence is on a numerical level.
Remember, if we were all homos, the human race would cease to exist. Speaking pluralistically, one of the litmus tests of a legitimate lifestyle is how well it scales across a culture. Homosexuality does not scale.
Oh, man, Askolodotna. What about greek or roman cultures?
and homosexuality is a natural part of animal behavior, so apparently no one told God that he ****ed up.
Look, it is obvious that ena is a repressed homosexual. As such, I am willing, in my everlasting quest to better this world, to have sex with him. Note that I am not gay, but it is one sacrifice I am willing to make in the war against all that ena stands for. So ena, tell me when. I'll bring the Vaseline.
Look, it is obvious that ena is a repressed homosexual. As such, I am willing, in my everlasting quest to better this world, to have sex with him. Note that I am not gay, but it is one sacrifice I am willing to make in the war against all that ena stands for. So ena, tell me when. I'll bring the Vaseline.
Seems like he?s probably repressing his deep desire to have a kinky threesome too.
How?s nine thirty sound to you?
I?ll bring the strap-ons, the bullwhip, & the poodle.
All you have to bring is a Vietnamese Immigrant & some raspberry jelly.
If you treated your Askolodotna strawman the way you just treated me, there's should be no surprise if (s)he twisted off on you.(and it's Soldotna, down on the Kenai Peninsula). Remedial geography, anyone?
And BR, the Anchorage-Matsu area has a population of about 325,000+ people. And no igloos. Get real---the earth isn't flat and Alaska isn't the end of it.
Quote:
Oh, man, Askolodotna. What about greek or roman cultures?
Hells bells giant, what about Christian, Jewish, Islamic and Chinese Cultures? Yes, they didn't burn out after several hundred years.---they all have a narrowly defined culture at their center.
You on the other hand is hinting hindering the actual love people are feeling
Try looking at it this way: when you see something you want you must pay for it. Much in the same way that property rights deny a thief what he must pay for. With any rule set there is denial (which is basically the point of the rules.)
BR and der Kopf let's quit with the personal attacks before the thread has to be closed.
If you don't agree, then don't agree, but don't weaken your stance and opinion by resorting to childish ad hominem attacks.
Here Here to that Applenut.
I started this post..I didn't think you wanted this thread to last Der Kopf ? Why do my posts get used as wrestling rings for people to fire spitballs at each other?
Sheesh, It's tough enough to be upside down in the furtherest point away from the rest of you on the planet, as well as having to post all alone as every one else on the planet is alseep. ( For whole hours there it literally no one else out there. )
Like I said, I opened this post to hear opinions, I like to think you are all level headed intellectual types..hmmm..Maybe I could learn from you guys..?
But my parrot has learn't enough swear words from you lot to last him ten life times\
Comments
Originally posted by Anders
Share your body freely? Please elaborate. Does that mean if I shared MY OWN MONEY freely it would be morally wrong?
Your thinking is screwed up severely.
Maybe, we'll see.
Originally posted by Hassan i Sabbah
Dear Askolodotna:
It's all so clear now. I'm surprised I didn't remember.
Originally posted by giant
It's all so clear now. I'm surprised I didn't remember.
You'll have to take number giant. I'm currently scheduled to be under Brussle's bed and after that I have to be al Dajjal's boogie man. I might be able to be your vaporous apparition on the 31st of this month, but you'll have to furnish your own peyote.
Originally posted by ena
Maybe, we'll see.
Elaborate please.
Originally posted by ena
You'll have to take number giant. I'm currently scheduled to be under Brussle's bed and after that I have to be al Dajjal's boogie man. I might be able to be your vaporous apparition on the 31st of this month, but you'll have to furnish your own peyote.
see. that was excatly your response when you changed your name after completely losing it. Then one of the mods pointed out that it actually was you.
Get a life, Askolodotna
Originally posted by bunge
Elaborate please.
I think there is a functionality to the restraints connected to the Jewish/Christian/Islamic/(even some "primitive" cultures) way of approaching marriage. Much in the same way that property rights give property value and make us want to "take care" of what we own. I think when you more of less sanction free love, then you end up with an unsustainable situation on a lot of different levels.
The thing with the culture transplant in the US is pretty complicated, but in the end the sexual revolution might have been more of a byproduct of the shift of the "Man under God/Justice as law" to the "Man as a crature of the state/Law to promote order" paradigm.
Without quoting any one sacred text or (Dena'ina tribal wisdom), most religions pretty much promise disaster with the marginalization of "the family".
Originally posted by giant
Then one of the mods pointed out that it actually was you.
I'd rather hear that from the mods. I'm not certain there is way of conclusivly telling who is who on these boards. If that is true, then I think you might be getting angry and calling me names (agian). Trying to discredit me was amusing at first but, if you don't like what I say, maybe you shouldn't read my posts.
Ya think?
You on the other hand is hinting hindering the actual love people are feeling
Originally posted by ena
Trying to discredit me was amusing at first but, if you don't like what I say, maybe you shouldn't read my posts.
I tried putting you on my ignore list, but it screwed up the formating of the threads, Askolodotna
Originally posted by giant
I tried putting you on my ignore list, but it screwed up the formating of the threads, Askolodotna
Giant, I gotta hand it to you, when you get something in your head you don't let go.
Obviously I've said something that has set you guys off. I'll leave you to it.
So much for a rational discussion.
Originally posted by ena
I think there is a functionality to the restraints connected to the Jewish/Christian/Islamic/(even some "primitive" cultures) way of approaching marriage. Much in the same way that property rights give property value and make us want to "take care" of what we own. I think when you more of less sanction free love, then you end up with an unsustainable situation on a lot of different levels.
The thing with the culture transplant in the US is pretty complicated, but in the end the sexual revolution might have been more of a byproduct of the shift of the "Man under God/Justice as law" to the "Man as a crature of the state/Law to promote order" paradigm.
Without quoting any one sacred text or (Dena'ina tribal wisdom), most religions pretty much promise disaster with the marginalization of "the family".
Let me put that through the bullshit filter and here is what we come up with.
De-bullshitified Akso/Ena says:
My way or the highway. I'm a nosey fvck and cannot handle views different from mine which leads me to want to enforce change on society so that they adapt to my archaic, bigoted way of thinking. I think this idea stems from the time I spent that winter alone in the igloo without other human contact and that baby seal started looking a lot like anna nicole smith and well one thing led to another and now i'm a militant christian family values man as a result.
Originally posted by Anders
The society deciding what I use my money for is equiliant to the society deciding what I use my body for. Only difference is that I consider the body much more personally than my money and thus something much more importent for me to control.
Ah yes, "free love"--it makes keeping a concubine so much easier if you get rid of one word and call it something else.
Main Entry
Pronunciation
Function
Etymology
Date
: a woman with whom a man cohabits without being married: as a : one having a recognized social status in a household below that of a wife b : MISTRESS 4a
Originally posted by ena
On a societal level homosexuality is a suicidal impulse. Some cultures recognize this fact and militate against it. There are revelational morality issues, don't get me wrong, but all viable cultures protect their core (sometimes it's the family, sometimes its the state). One of the ways homosexuality attacks a culture's existence is on a numerical level.
Remember, if we were all homos, the human race would cease to exist. Speaking pluralistically, one of the litmus tests of a legitimate lifestyle is how well it scales across a culture. Homosexuality does not scale.
Oh, man, Askolodotna. What about greek or roman cultures?
and homosexuality is a natural part of animal behavior, so apparently no one told God that he ****ed up.
Originally posted by der Kopf
Look, it is obvious that ena is a repressed homosexual. As such, I am willing, in my everlasting quest to better this world, to have sex with him. Note that I am not gay, but it is one sacrifice I am willing to make in the war against all that ena stands for. So ena, tell me when. I'll bring the Vaseline.
Seems like he?s probably repressing his deep desire to have a kinky threesome too.
How?s nine thirty sound to you?
I?ll bring the strap-ons, the bullwhip, & the poodle.
All you have to bring is a Vietnamese Immigrant & some raspberry jelly.
If you don't agree, then don't agree, but don't weaken your stance and opinion by resorting to childish ad hominem attacks.
And BR, the Anchorage-Matsu area has a population of about 325,000+ people. And no igloos. Get real---the earth isn't flat and Alaska isn't the end of it.
Oh, man, Askolodotna. What about greek or roman cultures?
Hells bells giant, what about Christian, Jewish, Islamic and Chinese Cultures? Yes, they didn't burn out after several hundred years.---they all have a narrowly defined culture at their center.
Originally posted by Anders
Free love? Who is talking about free love?
You on the other hand is hinting hindering the actual love people are feeling
Try looking at it this way: when you see something you want you must pay for it. Much in the same way that property rights deny a thief what he must pay for. With any rule set there is denial (which is basically the point of the rules.)
Originally posted by applenut
BR and der Kopf let's quit with the personal attacks before the thread has to be closed.
If you don't agree, then don't agree, but don't weaken your stance and opinion by resorting to childish ad hominem attacks.
Here Here to that Applenut.
I started this post..I didn't think you wanted this thread to last Der Kopf ? Why do my posts get used as wrestling rings for people to fire spitballs at each other?
Sheesh, It's tough enough to be upside down in the furtherest point away from the rest of you on the planet, as well as having to post all alone as every one else on the planet is alseep. ( For whole hours there it literally no one else out there. )
Like I said, I opened this post to hear opinions, I like to think you are all level headed intellectual types..hmmm..Maybe I could learn from you guys..?
But my parrot has learn't enough swear words from you lot to last him ten life times