Giselle is very hot, however I can see some guys' point. It's good for a lady, even a "skinny" one, to have a little more to...uh...hold on to...if you know what I mean.
An infant can recognize a simple "pretty" face but it requires maturity to really appreciate women. Evidently you're still stuck at the infant part.
How about you and Chucker post your own pictures and we see who is more qualified to be judging attractiveness.
If you're into "classical" bodies, that's certainly a perference, but it's far from being more mature than appreciating the waif look. In fact, I drew some laughter at your comment "Female track athletes have the best legs," not because I think there's a problem with that, but because it harkens back to a certain line from a certain, well known cross-over rap song. Namely, "I like my women like Flo-Jo."
There are many different attributes in a woman that a given man might be attracted to, but I'll tell you for a fact that most men don't look for a woman that can run the 100m in 11.2 seconds. Ms. Bunchen has gotten to the place where she is now because she looks elegant in clothing, which more often than not men buy this stuff for their significant others. In this modern age, it's certainly a valid position to place aesthetic value on how a woman looks in clothes, rather than fertility, or, for that matter, the ability to quickly traverse a length of flat ground.
If you're into "classical" bodies, that's certainly a perference, but it's far from being more mature than appreciating the waif look. In fact, I drew some laughter at your comment "Female track athletes have the best legs," not because I think there's a problem with that, but because it harkens back to a certain line from a certain, well known cross-over rap song. Namely, "I like my women like Flo-Jo."
There are many different attributes in a woman that a given man might be attracted to, but I'll tell you for a fact that most men don't look for a woman that can run the 100m in 11.2 seconds. Ms. Bunchen has gotten to the place where she is now because she looks elegant in clothing, which more often than not men buy this stuff for their significant others. In this modern age, it's certainly a valid position to place aesthetic value on how a woman looks in clothes, rather than fertility, or, for that matter, the ability to quickly traverse a length of flat ground.
I'd rather place aesthetic value on how a woman looks out of clothes.
I find women more attractive if they are physically capable, because to a certain degree this is reflected in their appearance. The track athletes are attractive because they are athletic, in both their capacity for speed and the way it is reflected physically on their body.
I'd rather place aesthetic value on how a woman looks out of clothes.
I find women more attractive if they are physically capable, because to a certain degree this is reflected in their appearance. The track athletes are attractive because they are athletic, in both their capacity for speed and the way it is reflected physically on their body.
Plus, there are some real knockouts on the team.
Back in the day when I was on high school track, it wasn't exactly cool to run slower than girls, even if you are watching from behind. In the 3200 they'd run us together, and if you didn't double-lap the winning girl, the bus ride home from the meet was a bad one.
Moving along, most [good] distance runners have thin legs. Not Gisele-thin, but still pretty thin. As far as looking at a woman with her clothes off, the "classical" ideal was still very influenced on pre-historic ideals of fertility. Since then, women have become more than just baby-making machines, and I think it's very timely to appreciate a woman with more boyish looks than motherly looks. After all, the male aesthetic has traditionally been valued more, and for good reason: it was more elegant. Then steroids came along.
Comments
Originally posted by Elixir
you may have preferences and such but a pretty face will always be a pretty face.
She's pretty, but I just don't find her very exciting. Heck, Sheryl Crow would be better.
Originally posted by Chucker
She's pretty, but I just don't find her very exciting. Heck, Sheryl Crow would be better.
you must have just one testicle to say something like that....
a small one.
Originally posted by Elixir
you must have just one testicle to say something like that....
a small one.
You'd be mistaken.
And this thread is starting to suck.
Originally posted by Elixir
you must have just one testicle to say something like that....
a small one.
Isn't this a pretty much pointless argument since both women are way out of your range?
Originally posted by Elixir
oh please it has been scientifically tested that certain dimensions are sought after by even infants.
so dont give me that bullcrap.
you may have preferences and such but a pretty face will always be a pretty face.
An infant can recognize a simple "pretty" face but it requires maturity to really appreciate women. Evidently you're still stuck at the infant part.
How about you and Chucker post your own pictures and we see who is more qualified to be judging attractiveness.
Originally posted by geekdreams
... If anything, the caption under Giselle should read "Beauty" and the caption under the Mac should read "Beauty + Brains."
OMG, ROFL... that is great. Were you a finalist perhaps in the joy of tech comic caption contest? ha ha.
The caption..."Which one is hotter? Which would you prefer on your lap?"
Originally posted by Placebo
An infant can recognize a simple "pretty" face but it requires maturity to really appreciate women. Evidently you're still stuck at the infant part.
How about you and Chucker post your own pictures and we see who is more qualified to be judging attractiveness.
If you're into "classical" bodies, that's certainly a perference, but it's far from being more mature than appreciating the waif look. In fact, I drew some laughter at your comment "Female track athletes have the best legs," not because I think there's a problem with that, but because it harkens back to a certain line from a certain, well known cross-over rap song. Namely, "I like my women like Flo-Jo."
There are many different attributes in a woman that a given man might be attracted to, but I'll tell you for a fact that most men don't look for a woman that can run the 100m in 11.2 seconds. Ms. Bunchen has gotten to the place where she is now because she looks elegant in clothing, which more often than not men buy this stuff for their significant others. In this modern age, it's certainly a valid position to place aesthetic value on how a woman looks in clothes, rather than fertility, or, for that matter, the ability to quickly traverse a length of flat ground.
Originally posted by Splinemodel
If you're into "classical" bodies, that's certainly a perference, but it's far from being more mature than appreciating the waif look. In fact, I drew some laughter at your comment "Female track athletes have the best legs," not because I think there's a problem with that, but because it harkens back to a certain line from a certain, well known cross-over rap song. Namely, "I like my women like Flo-Jo."
There are many different attributes in a woman that a given man might be attracted to, but I'll tell you for a fact that most men don't look for a woman that can run the 100m in 11.2 seconds. Ms. Bunchen has gotten to the place where she is now because she looks elegant in clothing, which more often than not men buy this stuff for their significant others. In this modern age, it's certainly a valid position to place aesthetic value on how a woman looks in clothes, rather than fertility, or, for that matter, the ability to quickly traverse a length of flat ground.
I'd rather place aesthetic value on how a woman looks out of clothes.
I find women more attractive if they are physically capable, because to a certain degree this is reflected in their appearance. The track athletes are attractive because they are athletic, in both their capacity for speed and the way it is reflected physically on their body.
Plus, there are some real knockouts on the team.
Originally posted by Placebo
I'd rather place aesthetic value on how a woman looks out of clothes.
I find women more attractive if they are physically capable, because to a certain degree this is reflected in their appearance. The track athletes are attractive because they are athletic, in both their capacity for speed and the way it is reflected physically on their body.
Plus, there are some real knockouts on the team.
Back in the day when I was on high school track, it wasn't exactly cool to run slower than girls, even if you are watching from behind. In the 3200 they'd run us together, and if you didn't double-lap the winning girl, the bus ride home from the meet was a bad one.
Moving along, most [good] distance runners have thin legs. Not Gisele-thin, but still pretty thin. As far as looking at a woman with her clothes off, the "classical" ideal was still very influenced on pre-historic ideals of fertility. Since then, women have become more than just baby-making machines, and I think it's very timely to appreciate a woman with more boyish looks than motherly looks. After all, the male aesthetic has traditionally been valued more, and for good reason: it was more elegant. Then steroids came along.