Briefly: Apple TV, QuickBooks warning, backdating suit, Triple Play

Posted:
in General Discussion edited January 2014
Apple TV is leading a pack of new retail-based Internet video devices, according to one firm. Meanwhile, Intuit screws up big time and issues an update to QuickBooks that caused data loss for some users. And Apple has filed for a trademark on the phrase "Triple Play."



Apple TV leads pack



A new breed of retail-based Internet video delivery devices has emerged over the past few years, lead by the $300 Apple TV wireless set-top-box, claims ABI Research. However, the firm notes in a new report that these devices have had difficulty resonating with consumers, largely due to their higher prices and competition from legacy set-top boxes, as well as confusion over the benefits they will ultimately bring to the buyer.



Overall, ABI Research believes that this new breed of devices will see shipments of 1.2 million in 2008.



?Since this category first emerged in 2004-2005 with the debut of Akimbo?s public Internet VOD product, vendors of these products have struggled with a number of hurdles that have so far made this market relatively unsuccessful,? said research director Michael Wolf. ?The high cost of these devices, their reliance on the home network, the need for consumer self-installation, and the scarcity of content have all contributed to their lack of commercial success.?



Nonetheless, ABI believes that two factors offer new hope for these devices. While early examples lacked significant amounts of content, new models such as Vudu?s video device have significant libraries, including high definition movies. Additionally, the firm noted that consumers? growing hunger for both user-generated and professionally produced content on the Internet could create greater demand for these new devices.



?This market will continue to be challenged by traditional set-top boxes, which are incorporating more VOD and public Internet delivery features, and by the emergence of VOD services on the Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3, and those such as the TiVo/Amazon Unbox offering,? Wolf added. ?However, we believe that there is a possibility of a break-out success among these new entrants if they can create compelling content offerings, make consumer installation and management incredibly easy, and offer both the hardware and content at compelling pricing. We believe one way to achieve this is by incorporating some premium content using advertising support."



QuickBooks warning



Meanwhile, some users of Intuit's Mac QuickBooks software were blind-sided this weekend when an automatic software update to the accounting software wound up deleting the entire contents of their Mac's desktop folder.



Apparently, there was a problem with the update for QuickBooks Pro Mac for version 2006 and 2007 that displayed the following message: "there is not enough disk space to install." User's who agreed to proceed with the installation knowing they did have the required space subsequently found the contents of their Desktop folder missing upon restart.



Intuit claims to have identified and resolved the issue, removing the automatic software update from its servers. However, those users who have already installed the update should contact Intuit's technical support team, which has undoubtedly scurried into emergency damage control mode.



Pension fund to press forth with suit



The pension fund for New York City's public employees is pushing forward with its lawsuit against Apple, even though a federal judge's ruling suggests shareholders don't have a case against the company.



Last month, U.S. District Judge Jeremy Fogel of San Jose granted Apple's motion for dismissal in the stock options backdating suit brought against chief executive Steve Jobs and thirteen other current and former members of the company's leadership, stating that shareholders hadn't suffered financial damages from the events because the company's shares continued to surge.



Fogel advised the shareholders to join a derivative suit, on behalf of the company, which would mean plaintiffs would not stand to receive payouts. However, the NY Sun reports that the New York City group decided not to heed the advice, and on Friday re-filed a new version of the suit seeking damages.



Apple seeks 'Triple Play' trademark



Finally, AppleInsider has learned that Apple recently filed for a trademark on the phrase 'Triple Play' through an overseas trademark office.



The filing, which remains under examination, described Triple Play as a "retail store services in the field of entertainment, namely, musical, audio and audiovisual works and related merchandise, provided via the internet and other computer and electronic communication networks."



While Apple does not offer a distinct service under the "Triple Play" name, it does currently offer "3 for 2 Triple Plays" via its iTunes download service. Essentially a video discount deal, iTunes Triple Plays offer three music videos ($1.99 each) from select artists for the price of two ($3.99).
«1

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 30
    [QUOTE=AppleInsider;1185541]Apple TV is leading a pack of new retail-based Internet video devices, according to one firm. Meanwhile, Intuit screws up big time and issues an update to QuickBooks that caused data loss for some users. And Apple has filed for a trademark on the phrase "Triple Play."





    Difficult for Apple to get a trademark on this phrase as it is already in use by a sportswear company of long standing.
  • Reply 2 of 30
    [QUOTE=AppleInsider;1185541]Apple TV is leading a pack of new retail-based Internet video devices, according to one firm. Meanwhile, Intuit screws up big time and issues an update to QuickBooks that caused data loss for some users. And Apple has filed for a trademark on the phrase "Triple Play."



    Oh, yes. One other thing it is also the title of a great Johnny Hodges CD
  • Reply 3 of 30
    nceencee Posts: 836member
    [QUOTE=lastofthebarons;1185555]
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by AppleInsider View Post


    Apple TV is leading a pack of new retail-based Internet video devices, according to one firm. Meanwhile, Intuit screws up big time and issues an update to QuickBooks that caused data loss for some users. And Apple has filed for a trademark on the phrase "Triple Play."



    Oh, yes. One other thing it is also the title of a great Johnny Hodges CD



    BUT, there is a small hole in the trademark laws called "the grey area" or is it "Grey Law" (I believe) - which basically say's that if one product or service, isn't of the same nature of another then one can use something already trademark.



    Case in point.



    There is a famous local Hot Dog stand in Lewiston, Maine, that for sometime, marketed themself as the "Best Place to get an HD" "Serving the best HD's around" "Home of the best HD's" and a few other simular sayings. Well you guessed it, Harley-Davidson went after them, but the case was thrown out of court, once is was pointed out, that the "HD" stood for "Hot Dogs" (and these were ones that didn't leak )



    At least this is what I was told by the owner of the stand.



    Skip
  • Reply 4 of 30
    [QUOTE=lastofthebarons;1185551]
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by AppleInsider View Post


    Difficult for Apple to get a trademark on this phrase as it is already in use by a sportswear company of long standing.



    It's also the name of Comcast's internet/voip/digital tv package
  • Reply 5 of 30
    I'm sure Apple's major lack of interest with the Apple TV might have had something to do with the lack of excitement.
  • Reply 6 of 30
    From Wikipedia:

    In telecommunications, the triple play service is a marketing term for the provisioning of the two broadband services, high-speed Internet access and television, and one narrowband service, telephone, over a single broadband connection. Triple Play focuses on a combined business model rather than solving technical issues or a common standard.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triple_...communications)
  • Reply 7 of 30
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by AppleInsider View Post


    ...iTunes Triple Plays offer three music videos ($1.99 each) from select artists for the price of two ($3.99).



    $1.99 * 2 = $3.98 ≠ $3.99



    Nitpick, I know, but which is it? A penny saved is a penny earned.



    Quote:
    Originally Posted by brianus View Post


    It's also the name of Comcast's internet/voip/digital tv package



    That's the first thing that came to my mind as well. And since Comcast markets internet and media services, I'm wondering if this is going to be a struggle. I wonder if Comcast has the term trademarked.....



    I hope it doesn't make for a poor business relationship because I use Comcast and Macs. Last thing I need is LESS interoperability between my electronics... especially due to stupid feuds (read: Microsoft and Netscape).



    -Clive
  • Reply 8 of 30
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by brianus View Post


    It's also the name of Comcast's internet/voip/digital tv package



    And Verizon's FiOS internet/voice/TV combo.



    This is an extremely widespread term, used by a lot of different companies in a lot of different industries. Apple should not be allowed to trademark the phrase.
  • Reply 9 of 30
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by shamino View Post


    And Verizon's FiOS internet/voice/TV combo.



    This is an extremely widespread term, used by a lot of different companies in a lot of different industries. Apple should not be allowed to trademark the phrase.



    Could it be a reference to the ability to buy a digital movie on iTunes and play it on...

    1) a Mac

    2) an iPod/iPhone

    3) an AppleTV
  • Reply 10 of 30
    so, they plan to sue for damages when their were no damages...... I am confused.... say whaaaaat? I think people just like to find *any* reason to sue. Our country is retarded...
  • Reply 11 of 30
    hattighattig Posts: 832member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by nofear1az View Post


    so, they plan to sue for damages when their were no damages...... I am confused.... say whaaaaat? I think people just like to find *any* reason to sue. Our country is retarded...



    It's doubly retarded in this case.



    1) The shares have been surging up for the past few years. They've made a boat-load of money regardless. Put up and shut up, perhaps? Maybe they lost a dollar apiece, which compared to the gains on the shares is like complaining about not getting the 1 penny change from a $99.99 purchase.



    2) Any cost to Apple of defending this suit lessens the value of Apple, and thus the value of its shares ...



    The judge has made his point quite clear. There are no damages. How they can hope to sue for damages now after that is quite beyond me. I think the only think damaged is their pride, since they've shown themselves to be so braindead. To think that people are entrusting their retirements to such people!
  • Reply 12 of 30
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by AppleInsider View Post


    Apple TV leads pack



    A new breed of retail-based Internet video delivery devices has emerged over the past few years, lead by the $300 Apple TV wireless set-top-box, claims ABI Research.



    The ABI report is titled "AppleTV leads a struggling bread..." but the report itself doesn't expand on that 'lead', except to say that there are a new breed of internet-based set top boxes and that AppleTV is the most notable of these.



    http://www.abiresearch.com/abiprdisp...p?pressid=1010



    I am of the opinion that the AppleTV hardware and ease of use is great... it just has no content.
  • Reply 13 of 30
    Quote:

    The pension fund for New York City's public employees is pushing forward with its lawsuit against Apple, even though a federal judge's ruling suggests shareholders don't have a case against the company.



    Last month, U.S. District Judge Jeremy Fogel of San Jose granted Apple's motion for dismissal in the stock options backdating suit brought against chief executive Steve Jobs and thirteen other current and former members of the company's leadership, stating that shareholders hadn't suffered financial damages from the events because the company's shares continued to surge.



    Fogel advised the shareholders to join a derivative suit, on behalf of the company, which would mean plaintiffs would not stand to receive payouts. However, the NY Sun reports that the New York City group decided not to heed the advice, and on Friday re-filed a new version of the suit seeking damages.





    What is needed is a corporate oppression remedy on behalf of all shareholders of Apple, inc.



    My advice to the New York City's public employees' pension fund: Hire the best corporate lawyers of New York City and sue Apple for the billions Steve Jobs wrongfully took from the company. Don't let Steve Jobs get away with your money!



    As a pension fund, you can afford the best lawyers that money can buy. If ever there was a case of corporate oppression, this is one.



  • Reply 14 of 30
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by ouragan View Post


    My advice... sue Apple for the billions Steve Jobs wrongfully took from the company. Don't let Steve Jobs get away with your money!







    What billions Steve took?

    (I'm assuming your means you're joking... but I'm not positive, and others may also interpret it as serious)



    Share backdating can affect the share price.. reducing the value of people's shares since somebody else gets given a huge number of cheaper shares. Just like paying someone a huge amount of cash, which can affect share price - except that the cash is obvious and well controlled, hence with backdating there is a law that Apple (or any company) should disclose what they're doing.



    If Apple shares weren't going up and up and up... there'd be more of a case that they were losing money. And that's pretty well what the Judge said.
  • Reply 15 of 30
    teckstudteckstud Posts: 6,476member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by shamino View Post


    And Verizon's FiOS internet/voice/TV combo.



    This is an extremely widespread term, used by a lot of different companies in a lot of different industries. Apple should not be allowed to trademark the phrase.



    I'd say. What a lame name to be trying to get a trade mark for.

    What's next a "Buy One Get One Free" trademark application?

    Also if you buy a movie, like a song, you should be able to play it on many devices not just Apple's.
  • Reply 16 of 30
    jeffdmjeffdm Posts: 12,949member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by nofear1az View Post


    so, they plan to sue for damages when their were no damages...... I am confused.... say whaaaaat? I think people just like to find *any* reason to sue. Our country is retarded...



    Damages to stock price are hard to measure but I don't think the damages were zero. There's no way to know if the stock would be 195 today if more stockholders had more confidence in the leadership's ethics. Certain people did take more from the company than the company approved, and that difference can be easily calculated. It would be the difference in value of a share from the real strike date price to the forged strike date price times the number of optioned shares in question.
  • Reply 17 of 30
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by teckstud View Post


    What a lame name to be trying to get a trade mark for.

    What's next a "Buy One Get One Free" trademark application?



    Perhaps Apple doesn't want the trade mark.

    ie: What they want is clarity on whether they can use the term.



    By applying for the trademark they'll either

    1) get the trademark (and use it in marketing etc)

    2) get told someone else has the trademark (and NOT use it)

    3) get told it's generic and open for anyone to use (and they can use it in marketing).
  • Reply 18 of 30
    jeffdmjeffdm Posts: 12,949member
    [QUOTE=ncee;1185558]
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by lastofthebarons View Post




    BUT, there is a small hole in the trademark laws called "the grey area" or is it "Grey Law" (I believe) - which basically say's that if one product or service, isn't of the same nature of another then one can use something already trademark.



    Case in point.



    There is a famous local Hot Dog stand in Lewiston, Maine, that for sometime, marketed themself as the "Best Place to get an HD" "Serving the best HD's around" "Home of the best HD's" and a few other simular sayings. Well you guessed it, Harley-Davidson went after them, but the case was thrown out of court, once is was pointed out, that the "HD" stood for "Hot Dogs" (and these were ones that didn't leak )



    At least this is what I was told by the owner of the stand.



    That's true, but I don't know what it's called. Basically, when a trademark is registered, it's actually registered under one of a large number of specific categories. If "Triple Play" was registered as a media service, it's still legitimate to have footwear and clothing under the same "Triple Play" name, though I think the logo has to be distinctive and it's in an unrelated industry, i.e., not easily confused with each other.



    This is all my understanding, I really don't remember how I learned about this.
  • Reply 19 of 30
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by GregAlexander View Post


    What billions Steve took?



    Share backdating can affect the share price, reducing the value of people's shares since somebody else was given a huge number of cheaper shares. Just like paying someone a huge amount of cash, which can affect share price - except that the cash is obvious and well controlled, hence with backdating, there is a law that Apple (or any company) should disclose what they're doing.





    What I have in mind are the bonuses paid to Steve Jobs and his pet Vice-Presidents over the last 2 years: Over one billion dollars, most of it through illegal backdating of stock options.



    And it would seem that most bonuses paid since 1997, since Steve Jobs returned to Apple, were illegally backdated, billions of dollars in illegal bonuses.



    Illegal means just that: illegal, forbidden.



    Greedy Steve had it coming, as if the 4 billions he made from the sale of Pixar were not enough. Pixar was bought with the money Steve Jobs received from the sale of his Apple founder's shares in 1985.



    Steve Jobs is paid more than $15 millions per year to be Apple's CEO. To put matters in perspective, a bank CEO is paid $6 millions per year, all bonuses included. And Steve Jobs has a high school education. Why should he run a multinational corporation? And continue to do so after a 10 and a half year tenure? A CEO's position is not for life. Otherwise, it's called a tyrany.



  • Reply 20 of 30
    on another completely random happenstance thought: could a "triple play" be in reference to the rumored iTunes rental service? As in, purchasing a "triple play" of an individual file?



    mreh.
Sign In or Register to comment.