I appreciate your eye for detail. I would be first in line to rave about the sexy ways of syntax, grammar, and semantics, but not in these forums. Do you have anything to say related to Apple?
Quote:
Originally Posted by deanbar
For goodness sake, don't be so pedantic. I am also fussy about grammar and spelling, but when posting on forums, people usually type in a hurry to respond to a particular comment, and as in this case, it's usually obvious what is meant.
Hi. I also am a stickler for people actually reading what was said, and not just assuming they know what's going on.
The error was in the article and not a comment. It has now been corrected.
Comments
I appreciate your eye for detail. I would be first in line to rave about the sexy ways of syntax, grammar, and semantics, but not in these forums. Do you have anything to say related to Apple?
For goodness sake, don't be so pedantic. I am also fussy about grammar and spelling, but when posting on forums, people usually type in a hurry to respond to a particular comment, and as in this case, it's usually obvious what is meant.
Hi. I also am a stickler for people actually reading what was said, and not just assuming they know what's going on.
The error was in the article and not a comment. It has now been corrected.
Hi. I also am a stickler for people actually reading what was said, and not just assuming they know what's going on.
The error was in the article and not a comment. It has now been corrected.
It helps to have a bit of context too though, you didn't quote the problematic lines.
It helps to have a bit of context too though, you didn't quote the problematic lines.
Ah true... "You run an Apple website" and "you used "Job's" twice in this article" was a tad ambiguous.