Jobs to get another shot at demolishing "abomination" of a home

1234568»

Comments

  • Reply 141 of 144
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Gyokuro View Post


    I appreciate your eye for detail. I would be first in line to rave about the sexy ways of syntax, grammar, and semantics, but not in these forums. Do you have anything to say related to Apple?





    Quote:
    Originally Posted by deanbar View Post


    For goodness sake, don't be so pedantic. I am also fussy about grammar and spelling, but when posting on forums, people usually type in a hurry to respond to a particular comment, and as in this case, it's usually obvious what is meant.





    Hi. I also am a stickler for people actually reading what was said, and not just assuming they know what's going on.



    The error was in the article and not a comment. It has now been corrected.
  • Reply 142 of 144
    jeffdmjeffdm Posts: 12,951member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Matthew Yohe View Post


    Hi. I also am a stickler for people actually reading what was said, and not just assuming they know what's going on.



    The error was in the article and not a comment. It has now been corrected.



    It helps to have a bit of context too though, you didn't quote the problematic lines.
  • Reply 143 of 144
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by JeffDM View Post


    It helps to have a bit of context too though, you didn't quote the problematic lines.



    Ah true... "You run an Apple website" and "you used "Job's" twice in this article" was a tad ambiguous.
  • Reply 144 of 144
    Loving the new design, great work. Will it always be this way?
Sign In or Register to comment.