Sources reveal Apple's new iPod lineup with part numbers

Comments

• Reply 1 of 29

  ncee Posts: 857member

  September 9, 2009 10:14AM

  Just hours to go, to see how accurate the list is?
  
  
  
  Sure would be nice to see something New & Exciting come out of this meeting.
  
  
  
  Skip
• Reply 2 of 29

  ascii Posts: 5,936member

  September 9, 2009 10:14AM

  Do source think there might be a new iMac? Because Intel just released Core i5 this week.
  
  
  
  An iMac with Core i5 and SSD would be nice. Core 2 duo and HD is so yesterday
• Reply 3 of 29

  anantksundaram Posts: 20,392member

  September 9, 2009 10:15AM

  Touch?
• Reply 4 of 29

  john.b Posts: 2,741member

  September 9, 2009 10:16AM

  I'll take the following:

  • MC062LL/A - IPOD NANO 1[6]GB - BLACK
  
  
  • MC328LL/A- IPOD SHUFFLE 4GB - BLUE
  
  

  Also one of the new 64GB Touch iPods, when they start shipping.
  
  
  
  
• Reply 5 of 29

  2992 Posts: 202member

  September 9, 2009 10:17AM

  They will be just adding some bling-bling to what's already available.
  
  I'm not expecting anything special this time...
  
  iPod, is just so overrated. :P
• Reply 6 of 29

  ghostface147 Posts: 1,629member

  September 9, 2009 10:18AM

  If that lineup is proven correct, how uneventful from a hardware standpoint
• Reply 7 of 29

  iijuanii Posts: 19member

  September 9, 2009 10:21AM

  i was rally hoping for a 32 gb ipod nano. (with camera)
  
  
  
  for $200?
  
  that would sell like wildfire
• Reply 8 of 29

  roc ingersol Posts: 145member

  September 9, 2009 10:25AM

  That would be ... disappointing.
  
  
  
  Wonder if this is just Apple trying to set expectations?
• Reply 9 of 29

  2992 Posts: 202member

  September 9, 2009 10:27AM

  Quote:
  

  Originally Posted by Roc Ingersol
  
  
  That would be ... disappointing.
  
  
  
  Wonder if this is just Apple trying to set expectations?
  

  
  

  
  
  yep, as always, with most of rumours. Naughty Apple... )
• Reply 10 of 29

  unseenllama Posts: 9member

  September 9, 2009 10:29AM

  Bring on the Nike+ integration into the nano! One less piece to worry about losing. Hopefully they can add an HRM and update the software to allow for intervals.
• Reply 11 of 29

  teckstud Posts: 6,476member

  September 9, 2009 10:35AM

  Those specs for which shuffle? The latest one is so small why bother with colors?
• Reply 12 of 29

  lorre Posts: 396member

  September 9, 2009 10:35AM

  I'm more anxious about a snappier itunes tbh, not that it's a low application as is, but something tells me that some Cocoaification might bring it up a notch. Last.fm integration would also be cool since it'd allow me too uninstall the bloatware that is audioscrobbler.
• Reply 13 of 29

  nagromme Posts: 2,834member

  September 9, 2009 10:39AM

  (Double-post? Forums are messed up today.)
  
  
  
  I wonder if we won't see a new Touch until it comes out in Jan alongside a companion tablet-size model? The old Touch (now cheaper) and the Classic will fill in for the holiday season. Just a thought.
• Reply 14 of 29

  al_bundy Posts: 1,525member

  September 9, 2009 10:39AM

  Quote:
  

  Originally Posted by ascii
  
  
  Do source think there might be a new iMac? Because Intel just released Core i5 this week.
  
  
  
  An iMac with Core i5 and SSD would be nice. Core 2 duo and HD is so yesterday
  

  
  

  
  
  all iMacs and Mac Mini's use the same laptop CPU's as MBP's. Mac Pro's use the same server CPU as xServe's and HP/Dell servers. Unless Apple comes out with a new desktop line, iMac's will stay the same until the next laptop CPU from Intel
• Reply 15 of 29

  logisticaldron Posts: 833member

  September 9, 2009 10:39AM

  Last year Apple dropped the thicker, dual-platter 160GB iPod Classic and bumped the thinner, single-platter 80GB Classic to 120GB. I can’t find any evidence that HDD makers have increased the capacity of the single platter 1.8” HDDs to 160GB, so unless Apple plans on going back to the thicker Classic (which I can’t see happening and wonder if they did why not bump it to 240GB with dual-platters) I can’t see how the Classic will move to 160GB.
• Reply 16 of 29

  logisticaldron Posts: 833member

  September 9, 2009 10:39AM

  double
• Reply 17 of 29

  leonard Posts: 528member

  September 9, 2009 10:44AM

  Quote:
  

  Originally Posted by ascii
  
  
  Do source think there might be a new iMac? Because Intel just released Core i5 this week.
  
  
  
  An iMac with Core i5 and SSD would be nice. Core 2 duo and HD is so yesterday
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  No iMac announcement. This is gonna be an iTunes/iPod event. Apple typically keeps these events to one or two related topics.
  
  
  
  As well Intel announcements don't usually lead to Apple announcements. Apple announces their products on their schedule, not anyone else's, and Apple typically announces new hardware well after Intel, as the past has shown.
• Reply 18 of 29

  msantti Posts: 1,377member

  September 9, 2009 10:58AM

  No Touch=Epic fail IMO.
  
  
  
  Its the key product in the iPod lineup now.
• Reply 19 of 29

  mzungu Posts: 1member

  September 9, 2009 10:58AM

  how long will we have to wait for itouch upgrade? was hoping they'd announce now, sell as soon as tech fixed...?
• Reply 20 of 29

  ralphx Posts: 2member

  September 9, 2009 11:00AM

  think there will be new ipods and apple tv because of movies on itunes...
  
  but still waiting for new imacs..
  
  
  
  follow AppleStoreCheck on twitter and be the first to know when apple store is offline ;P