Consumers most unsatisfied with poor voice control, bad speakers in current smart watches
As Apple is thought to be nearing the release of its own so-called "iWatch," early smart watch adopters have grown frustrated with the current generation of wrist-worn devices, according to a new report released Wednesday.
Users most often cited errors with on-screen notifications, issues with the devices' batteries, frustrating voice control solutions, and poor speaker quality, question-and-answer website Fixya noted. The problems were collated from more than 6,000 troubleshooting requests for the Martian Passport, I'm Watch, Samsung Galaxy Gear, Sony SW2, and Pebble.
Users view smart watches primarily as an extension of their smartphone rather than a standalone device, the report concludes. This leads to frustration when even simple operations -- such as receiving notifications -- fail, forcing users to pull out their pocket devices when they may prefer not to.
The devices' displays were found to be a major factor affecting their usefulness. The relatively small size often hampered the utility of on-screen notifications, for instance, while seemingly not helping to improve battery life by a noticeable amount.
The compact displays also deal a blow to interactivity, which some manufacturers have tried to supplement with other input methods including voice control. Those with voice control were panned for its poor quality, while others were dinged for its absence.
Apple's forthcoming iWatch is believed to ship with a flexible AMOLED display between 1.3 and 1.5 inches diagonally, which would be nearly identical to the size offered by current smart watches. The company would likely depend on the relative superiority of its Siri voice-controlled digital assistant to differentiate it from existing options.
Additionally, Apple is thought to be aiming for at least one day of battery life by using advanced battery technology and fine-tuning individual components. That is similar to the running time offered by Samsung's offering, for example, but well short of the nearly one week that the monochrome e-paper display-equipped Pebble achieves.
One area in which Apple's offering would differ significantly, however, might be its functionality. Many think that the device will feature a focus on biometrics and personal health tracking, particularly in light of the numerous biomedical sensor experts Apple has hired in recent months.
The iWatch is expected to ship this fall, with some analysts estimating that Apple might sell as many as 10 million units during the holiday season.
Users most often cited errors with on-screen notifications, issues with the devices' batteries, frustrating voice control solutions, and poor speaker quality, question-and-answer website Fixya noted. The problems were collated from more than 6,000 troubleshooting requests for the Martian Passport, I'm Watch, Samsung Galaxy Gear, Sony SW2, and Pebble.
Users view smart watches primarily as an extension of their smartphone rather than a standalone device, the report concludes. This leads to frustration when even simple operations -- such as receiving notifications -- fail, forcing users to pull out their pocket devices when they may prefer not to.
The devices' displays were found to be a major factor affecting their usefulness. The relatively small size often hampered the utility of on-screen notifications, for instance, while seemingly not helping to improve battery life by a noticeable amount.
The compact displays also deal a blow to interactivity, which some manufacturers have tried to supplement with other input methods including voice control. Those with voice control were panned for its poor quality, while others were dinged for its absence.
Apple's forthcoming iWatch is believed to ship with a flexible AMOLED display between 1.3 and 1.5 inches diagonally, which would be nearly identical to the size offered by current smart watches. The company would likely depend on the relative superiority of its Siri voice-controlled digital assistant to differentiate it from existing options.
Additionally, Apple is thought to be aiming for at least one day of battery life by using advanced battery technology and fine-tuning individual components. That is similar to the running time offered by Samsung's offering, for example, but well short of the nearly one week that the monochrome e-paper display-equipped Pebble achieves.
One area in which Apple's offering would differ significantly, however, might be its functionality. Many think that the device will feature a focus on biometrics and personal health tracking, particularly in light of the numerous biomedical sensor experts Apple has hired in recent months.
The iWatch is expected to ship this fall, with some analysts estimating that Apple might sell as many as 10 million units during the holiday season.
Comments
Of course consumers are unsatisfied with current "smart watches".
Apple hasn't shown the way yet.
Current "smart watches" are just opportunistic plays by the likes of shady companies such as Scamsung to try and beat Apple to the market by releasing and rushing to the market an uninspired and poorly thought out design, basically crap.
It's just like with tablets before the iPad was released. Sure, there were a few tablets that existed before the iPad, but they were all terrible and nobody wanted them. It wasn't until Apple came along and showed everybody how to properly make a tablet, that everybody wanted one all of a sudden.
The same thing will happen with "smart watches". It'll take Apple to come along and release theirs before the buying public realizes how useful and desirable a smart watch could actually be.
There's a word for people who would consider buying a "smart watch" today, and that word is suckers, especially with Apple's watch right around the corner, if we are to believe the rumors.
I hate the way Samsung implemented the speaker on its Gear watch. The voice comes out loud. Hope, Apple addresses this.
Pranav Mistry could have used his brain a little more.
1) Why do I need a display on the backside of my wrist where I can't see it? Can you imagine a watch with that?
2) Why do I want a display and the other electronics to be flexible? Can you imagine a watch with that?
i could see the bio medical side of this being a major driver for many, especially as more sensors are crammed into the thing and more 3rd party ecosystems harvest and run analytics on the data
Users will be most unsatisfied with future smart watches when they utilize wireless technology (e.g., Bluetooth) that allows the wearer to be tracked (hacked?) everywhere. This is the downside (downfall?) of iBeacon. It's why every iOS update turns Bluetooth back on.
Users will be most unsatisfied with future smart watches when they utilize wireless technology (e.g., Bluetooth) that allows the wearer to be tracked (hacked?) everywhere. This is the downside (downfall?) of iBeacon. It's why every iOS update turns Bluetooth back on.
That's like saying the downside of a smart watch is that it's strapped to your wrist. The definition of iBeacon is that it "tracks" you and delivers content as you approach an iBeacon with your iPhone. Like it or not, it's just the way it works.
How is this any different from any or the wireless technologies that is being generated from your devices for years? Even just having a dumb phone means you're being tracked.
You're worried about Bluetooth, but not having an actual GPS in the phone that you carry around?
How is this any different from any or the wireless technologies that is being generated from your devices for years? Even just having a dumb phone means you're being tracked.
Precision + Accessibility = Pervasive
Could you elaborate on why wireless technologies are bad?
Could you elaborate on why wireless technologies are bad?
You know you're just trying to stifle dissent in an area where you stand to personally profit. I know very few people who are not concerned about the amount of their "cyber lives" that is tracked by Google. Now we're talking about technology--that Apple is fervently advancing--which will allow pervasive tracking of our everyday lives. It's already being done to a degree with Wi-Fi. Bluetooth (or some other wireless technology) will add an even more pervasive character. Unlike you apparently, I am being consistent in not wanting my on-line and everyday activities to be tracked.
1) How exactly do I profit from Bluetooth?
2) How exactly do you not think you're being tracked by any wired or wireless technology that connects to the internet. You're complaining about a single leaf while ignoring the forest.
1) How exactly do I profit from Bluetooth?
2) How exactly do you not think you're being tracked by any wired or wireless technology that connects to the internet. You're complaining about a single leaf while ignoring the forest.
1. iBeacon
2. (Bluetooth = Precision) + (iBeacon = widespread accessibility) = Pervasive detailed tracking
If you don't understand that, you don't know tech. Most likely, though, you're just being obtuse.
1) How do I profit from iBeacons?
2) How exactly are you tracked better with an iBeacon than simply using a cellphone where your position is constantly monitored and that info can be given to law enforcement, currently without your knowledge, as opposed to an iBeacon which is limited to 10 beacons stored in an app given to iOS, that also needs you to specifically allow?
3) Sure, you keep telling yourself that.
1) How do I profit from iBeacons?
2) How exactly are you tracked better with an iBeacon than simply using a cellphone where your position is constantly monitored?
3) Sure, you keep telling yourself that.
Quote:
1. iBeacon
2. (Bluetooth = Precision) + (iBeacon = widespread accessibility) = Pervasive detailed tracking
If you don't understand that, you don't know tech.
Popcorn. Popcorn. Popcorn. Popcorn.
To turn smart watches into a mainstream product, it's going to take some imagination and vision. If Apple simply created a miniature iPod Touch with a tiny touchscreen and an App Store, it wouldn't convince mainstream buyers to spend money on it. Whatever Apple comes up with when they enter this market, it should come with a product vision that sells it. Otherwise, Apple is going to have to call it another "hobby."