Qualcomm urging Chinese courts to extend sales ban to iPhone XS & XR
Qualcomm is attempting to extend the iPhone ban in China, and is in the process of filing additional lawsuits in the courts to extend the iPhone sales restriction to Apple's latest hardware releases.
"We plan to use the same patents to file suit against the three new iPhone models," a lawyer acting on behalf of Qualcomm told the Financial Times. The patents behind the original injunction earlier this week relate to photo editing and managing apps with a touchscreen.
Apple is not only appealing that injunction but continuing sales as normal, contending that it doesn't apply to devices preloaded with iOS 12 -- something even models like the iPhone 7 now come with. Qualcomm disagrees with that position.
In either case Monday's injunction was only directed at devices leading up to 2017's iPhone X. It isn't precisely clear what percentage of Apple's sales in China are pre-2018 models, but analysts have postulated between 20 percent and as high as 50 percent are the iPhone 8 and earlier.
The acrimony between Apple and Qualcomm extends back to at lest January 2017, when Apple filed a $1 billion lawsuit over patent royalty rebates, claiming Qualcomm withheld them as retaliation for cooperation with antitrust investigations. The battle quickly escalated, resulting in suits and countersuits around the world. In September, Qualcomm accused Apple of handing trade secrets to Intel to improve the performance of modems.
An August settlement over similar matters saw Qualcomm pay $93 million in fines to Taiwan and promise to invest $700 million in the country over five years.
Some investors have expressed fears about the new ban, which could affect Apple's already volatile stock coping with worries about 2018 iPhone sales and the U.S.-China trade war. The U.S. International Trade Commission is meanwhile reviewing a previous ruling and could theoretically allow a U.S. ban.
"We plan to use the same patents to file suit against the three new iPhone models," a lawyer acting on behalf of Qualcomm told the Financial Times. The patents behind the original injunction earlier this week relate to photo editing and managing apps with a touchscreen.
Apple is not only appealing that injunction but continuing sales as normal, contending that it doesn't apply to devices preloaded with iOS 12 -- something even models like the iPhone 7 now come with. Qualcomm disagrees with that position.
In either case Monday's injunction was only directed at devices leading up to 2017's iPhone X. It isn't precisely clear what percentage of Apple's sales in China are pre-2018 models, but analysts have postulated between 20 percent and as high as 50 percent are the iPhone 8 and earlier.
The acrimony between Apple and Qualcomm extends back to at lest January 2017, when Apple filed a $1 billion lawsuit over patent royalty rebates, claiming Qualcomm withheld them as retaliation for cooperation with antitrust investigations. The battle quickly escalated, resulting in suits and countersuits around the world. In September, Qualcomm accused Apple of handing trade secrets to Intel to improve the performance of modems.
An August settlement over similar matters saw Qualcomm pay $93 million in fines to Taiwan and promise to invest $700 million in the country over five years.
Some investors have expressed fears about the new ban, which could affect Apple's already volatile stock coping with worries about 2018 iPhone sales and the U.S.-China trade war. The U.S. International Trade Commission is meanwhile reviewing a previous ruling and could theoretically allow a U.S. ban.
Comments
That would give the kind of signal that would stop this sort of nonsense.
Would take year + to buy and likely would never pass anti-trust review of US, EU and/or China
Qualcomm is being sued by the FTC and EU for anti-trust. They had to settle with South Korea at cost of $700 for monopoly charges
Apple has the upper hand when this goes to trail in the US in April. Especially so if this China "band" gets reversed. Qualcomm is going to look completely foolish if it is, after issuing all these statements
Yeah and the 30,000 employees with families, pensions, savings, health care, and the collateral effect on the economy be damned. Just because you want to throw a hissy fit.
If you do the short swipe up from the bottom while you are in an app, to get to the the multi-card view that shows recently used apps that you can scroll through horizontally, does the card for the app you were originally in appear in full in the center of the screen? Or does only part of it show, on the right side of the screen?
This is important for one of the patent claims at issue.
I'm trying to figure out know whether Apple designed around the claims at issue in iOS 12. If it did, then it should be able to get the order modified to not cover older models running iOS 12.
Nope. I say let them die, while Apple builds its own 5G chips.
Qualcomm is losing its mind. XR and XS use Intel chips.
They can’t even get the old iPhones with Qualcomm chips banned with iOS 12.