muthuk_vanalingam

About

Username
muthuk_vanalingam
Joined
Visits
1,414
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
2,241
Badges
1
Posts
1,450
  • Compared: 2021 New 16-inch MacBook Pro vs. 2019 16-inch MacBook Pro

    nicholfd said:
    nicholfd said:
    zoetmb said:
    laytech said:
    Im sure someone has commented above but no Face ID, surely not. Are we still logging in with finger print? Surely not.
    So?  I prefer TouchID and I would prefer it on the iPhone as well.    It's easier to stick a finger over there than to have to stare at the camera and be recognized.   Especially on the phone in the car.    I HAVE to buy a new IPhone because I'm currently using an iPhone6 and a lot of the apps won't work anymore and it's bugging me that they won't restore TouchID until next year, so I'm going to be stuck without it. 


    And I wouldn't hold my breath "waiting until next year".  No one knows if Apple will ever return Touch ID.  Face ID is superior in almost all scenarios (and is proven more secure), so why return to something that is in general, inferior?
    Except when you are wearing masks and try to unlock your phone in the last 1.5 years.
    Not if you have an Apple Watch (I do).  My watch unlocks my phone almost as quickly as my face does.  The only time I'm not wearing my watch is when I'm cleaning up/showering.  So not an issue for me.

    ps. I did say "almost".
    There are 1 billion+ active iPhones in the world, of which at least 700-800 million would be having FaceID. How many of those iPhone owners have Apple Watch to unlock their iPhones? Yes, it is NOT an issue for you. But what about the rest of the world population who do not have Apple Watches?

    Edit: My earlier estimate of 700-800 million iPhones with FaceID seems to be on the higher side. For the last 4 years, considering a total of 800 million iPhones sold, it would be between 500-600 million iPhones with FaceID currently active, with earlier generation iPhones (7, 8 and SE series) making up the rest. Even then, the percentage of iPhone users with FaceID but not owning an Apple Watch is a HUGE population and their needs cannot be brushed aside just like that.
    williamlondonpscooter63vedelppadarkvader
  • House of Representatives bans staff use of 'high risk' TikTok

    jdw said:
    lkrupp said:
    This is frivolous to the lowest level. TikTok is an entertaining tool. Government building is for working. Of course it is inappropriate to use TikTok. But making it a national security issue is a plot by China haters to silence democracy. 
    Maybe the NSA, CIA, and the U.S. Military know something you don’t. But then you’re just a Chinese government operative spreading disinformation and propaganda. And who are you to be talking about democracy when your leader is a vicious despot.
    You are a liar! I have said here many times that I have nothing to do with Chinese government. And you China hater keeps making lies about me. And would you bet that every word I posted here have been recorded by CIA? US government has the world's largest network of spying. It is much larger than China or any other country. Can you deny it? NSA, CIA, and the U.S. Military know how to spy on every one. This is why they worry TikTok will spy on US. US has far more superior military power than China. I believe this is the simple reason CCP feel it is useless to spy everything on US. Of course they want to know what the US Congress is planning on Taiwan. And this is the reason US Congress don't want CCP to know. And this is democracy? I thought democracy is for peace like Jesus do.
    I personally believe you DO NOT have direct ties to the CCP.  However, based on your written defenses of anything pertaining to China, I would say that your wording is quite similar to other posts outside this forum authored by what are known as Chinese Nationalists.  Nationalists are average Chinese citizens who are extremely patriotic and defensive of China in general.  And while these nationalists are not affiliated with the CCP, they basically do precisely what the CCP wants insofar as the nationalists spread the same pro-China propaganda, and leave the door closed to anything negative about China.

    Overall, I would say your posts defending China here in this forum tend to be more defensive of China than just about any other person in the forum.  That shouldn't make you a target of hate, but it will attract the attention of people who strongly disagree with your largely pro-China stance.

    Personally, I wish we could all get along without strife.  But the only way to achieve that is to stop watching the news, stop being nationalistic/patriotic, and just view life in mostly optimistic terms.  Not everyone can do that.

    And so, because we are all different, the best we can do is just debate and fight for a time, then shake hands and agree to disagree in the end.  I think that's really the best way to settle matters of strong disagreement.  There's nothing wrong with even heated debate as long as it doesn't result in us hating each other.
    You are one of reasonable white Americans like GeorgeBMac. You know what is funny that despite what I said here I have not downloaded TikTok although I enjoy watching numerous TikTok videos my friends share with me, they are better and more decent that Google Shorts. 

    Why I defend China? It is simple. There are so much misconception and bias toward China. If you can convince me this is untrue I will stop defending China immediately. 

    Many years ago, one of my classmates who is studying at Stanford U took me on a tour to Fisherman's Wharf. While we walk along the crowded street a white guy walk past us and started yelling at me saying "go back to China!". Is this America? Is this democracy supposed to work? The US democracy is not for peace, it is to incite hatred. Although I admit there are more decent Americans than this guy, but you need just one to do bad things. 
    Just FYI - @Jdw is from Japan, not America. And how did you come to the conclusion of his skin color? You would be better off reading more and posting less (like @Jdw does) in AI forums. And that free advice is valid for me as well, so I will try my level best to follow my own advice going forward.
    waveparticleronnwilliamlondon
  • Apple unveils 16-inch MacBook Pro with M1 Pro, M1 Max starting at $2499

    elijahg said:
    Glad the ports many here declared "legacy" are back. Are they still "legacy" now?
    Apple doesn't use "legacy" ports ever. So, they are the "future" from now onwards :).
    AI_liaswilliamlondonelijahgavon b7cgWerksbaconstang
  • Meta's 11,000 job cuts may be only the beginning

    JP234 said:
    Since this is an Apple Insider forum, an appropriate example of historic trends seems appropriate.

    On January 26th, 1996, Sun Microsystems was in talks to buy up Apple, then worth $3.89 billion. Sun's market cap was over $10.6 billion.
    Today, Apple's market cap is $2.18 trillion. Sun was sold to Oracle Corporation in 2009 for $5.6 billion, and no longer exists.

    It remains to be seen how social media providers' competition for revenue shakes out, but the previous example speaks to the unpredicatbility of long term trends in customers' and clients' loyalties to tech providers. And with both customers and advertising clients abandoning existing social media platforms in large numbers, it's possible (even likely) the arc of their dominance will echo AOL's. No telling if a new social media platform will emerge to take their place, but it's also possible that global consumers have had enough of the toxic atmosphere generated by the lack of accountability or consequence. When I insult you in person, I risk violent retaliation, and thus am more likely to be civil. The anonymity and lack of physical proximity encourage the worst human instincts, as proven on ALL social media platforms. I've had enough. This is now the only forum in which I engage, and have been saddened by the increasing incivility I've been seeing here.
    Increasing incivility in this forum? I see that you have joined this forum on Feb-03-2022, just the beginning of this year. It used to be lot worse in the previous years. Forum admins have done a great job in moderation and it has become lot better compared to even 2 years ago. Just my 2 cents.
    tenthousandthingsbala1234sbdudewilliamlondonlolliverAlex1NFileMakerFellerJP234watto_cobra
  • Pay up or get out: Apple's options for South Korea's App Store law

    darkpaw said:
    What does this give to an indie developer? I can see it only affecting those developers who have the means to implement their own payment processor.

    What happens if Apple have to allow third-party stores onto iOS? Do I, as an indie dev, have to decide which stores to put my apps on? It's hard enough to deal with the one App Store at the moment, but adding extras will make it very time-consuming for me.

    Will Apple have to create some way for any third-party store to check our developer profiles and certificates?

    And what about updates? If I've signed up to three or four stores, every update has to go to those three or four stores. That multiplies my work with every store I sell in.

    Where are the updates stored? My own server? AWS? Who's paying for this?

    Will every store use the same image sizes for their marketing etc., or will I have to do a 2048x2048px image for Apple's store, and an 1896x1896px one for a different store?

    And what store is going to do this out of the goodness of their hearts? None. There will be a price. Will it be $99/year like Apple's? SO now I have to pay $99 plus $49 plus $35 plus $50 for those other stores every year.

    As an indie dev, I can't afford that. I'd stick with Apple's way of doing it.
    A post with too many silly questions. Funnily enough, you have answered ALL of your questions in the last line of your post. NOTHING changes for you. 
    tylersdadwilliamlondonelijahgurahara
  • Trump hesitates over instituting China tariffs that would hurt Apple

    FYI: the current trade agreement with Mexico and Canada was negotiated by the 1st Trump administration. That Trump trade agreement is what replaced NAFTA. So if he thinks Mexico/Canada are taking advantage of the U.S., it's because his own deal was garbage. 
    Do facts matter with cultists? I am from India and in similar situation to you guys in terms of dealing with cultists. Facts just do NOT matter to them. Only difference - We are in a slightly worser position here in India. Cultists have elected same PM for 3rd consecutive term (yes, it is allowed here, unlike US). And the signs are not looking good for next election in 2029 either.
    napoleon_phoneapartdewmelondordavsconosciutokurai_kageOferronn12Strangersdanox
  • Apple released the iMac 26 years ago and it's better than ever

    charlesn said:
    darkvader said:
    Dead_Pool said:
    Many have no idea how close Apple was to going under when the iMac was released. There was virtually no chance it would survive in the face of the onslaught by industry-standard Windows, which had finally been able to copy the Mac’s ease of use after more than a decade of trying. Today, Apple is arguably the most powerful company to ever exist. Truly unbelievable, and all thanks to one man: Steve Jobs. 
    All of that is complete bunk.

    Apple was in no danger of going under.  Apple was consistently profitable, had a huge chunk of cash in the bank, and was making far better computers than everybody else.

    Where Apple was struggling was with the development of the next generation operating system.  The NeXT purchase made sense for picking up a good UNIX-based OS, but sadly came with Steve Jobs, the man who was very justifiably fired from Apple in the early '80s.  Had Amelio been slightly more competent the first thing he'd have done after buying NeXT would have been to fire Jobs again, or at least contain him to the marketing department, with no influence on computer design.

    Oh, and Microsoft didn't approach Macintosh ease of use for another decade and a half.  The ONLY release they've ever had that came close was Windows 7, what they had in the '90s was absolute garbage.  I know there were people at the time saying things like "Windows 95 = Macintosh 87" but the reality was very different, Win95 was still ultimately a shell on top of DOS.
    Vader, I always look forward to your fact-free fiction! Your posts can be counted upon to give me the biggest laughs of the day. Thank you for that!
    Just FYI - He was banned by AI many months ago. You are replying to a post from him which is one year old.
    nubuscharlesn
  • Apple CEO Tim Cook attending Trump inauguration after $1 million donation

    Xed said:
    WOW after of the complete disaster of Biden & Harris, the US economy and the country itself brought to its knees there is still this insane hatred of Trump! Unbelievable. That's and opinion of someone in the UK looking at what has happened to the great nation of the USA of the last four years. Tim Cook knows big change is coming and all he is doing is positioning himself and Apple to take advantage of that.
    I don't expect you to do any research or read any actual news, but I would appreciate it you kept the douchey comments to a minimum.

    No, I don't read the propaganda, unlike you. You are looking and believing an illusion. You will learn, eventually. You hope Trump fails but he will not.

    Has Trump succeeded in making Mexico build that wall along the US border with their own money in his previous term? Or, is that planned for the current term? Or planned for some unknown date in future?
    ForumPostdavavon b7blastdoorjibtiredskillssconosciutowatto_cobrabyronl
  • Netflix CEO says Apple Vision Pro market is too insignificant to bother with

    dewme said: The Netflix CEO is pretty much at the same place that many of us are at with Vision Pro - "we'll see where things go" which means we will wait and see. I'm waiting too. The big difference is we're all waiting because there is about $4K of our hard earned cash on the line and we don't really know for sure how this thing will fit into our lives other than the gee-whiz and oh-wow factor
    If you know how an 100" 4K OLED TV would fit into your life then you already know how the AVP would fit. And you would be saving multiple thousands of dollars by getting the AVP instead of the TV. 
    By purchasing an AVP for each of your family members. /s
    designrwilliamlondondewmeAlex1N
  • Apple stock bloodbath continues after China applies retaliatory tariffs

    spheric said:


    lwr32 said:
    And how often was Obama on the golf course?
    Obama played golf 333 times during his 8 years, which is more than Trump. Trump's golf tally is harder to count, because one of his homes is on a golf course, and he's not always playing golf when he's at that home.
    We know how much Obama played golf because the administration was transparent. We don't don show much Trump paid golf because the administration is not transparent. Also, in his first term he spent 102 million on golf. At the time was just 12 million under what Obama spent on golf for his two terms. So far in this term he has spend another 18 million. So he may or may not have played as much golf as Obama but he has spent more on golf and the personally profits from the money the government spends on his golfing. But he is totally about trying to cut government spending. 
    Oh, he’s played way more golf than Obama. 

    Isn't it a lot better that your presidents play as much golf as possible - at least they are only messing up the green rather than the whole world
    Just FYI - As far as I recollect, @Spheric is from Europe, not USA. @22july2013 is from Canada (for sure) and @Stabitha_Christie is from USA (I am assuming based on post history) . So you have to be careful in making assumptions while posting in a forum like AppleInsider.
    tiredskillsdanoxradarthekat