vadimyuryev
About
- Username
- vadimyuryev
- Joined
- Visits
- 38
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 562
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 170
Reactions
-
Apple targets thermal performance issues on 2018 MacBook Pros with software update
dws-2 said:Very happy news. I just need to wait for confirmation of this.
Oddly, I don't think people realize what a great update this is. The speed alone is great, but there really is a lot packed into this.
First, I don't think people appreciate the security aspect. This computer is almost as locked down as an iPhone now, so if I lose it, I no longer have to worry about anyone getting my business or personal data. That alone is worth a lot to me.
Second, true tone is really nice for someone who stares at a computer screen for 8 hours a day.
Third, the RAM!!! 32 GB makes running virtual machines much better, and the two extra processors don't hurt, either.
The last big thing is the keyboard, but that's still uncertain. I'm seriously thinking of updating from a 2016 MBP with touch bar, but I'm waiting to see how well the keyboard seems to be standing up. The keyboard on that 2016 drove me crazy until the second replacement.
In short, with the possible exception of the keyboard, this is a very, very nice laptop.
Exactly the same speeds with encryption on or off, even shortly after turning encryption on.
The 2017 model, on the other hand, took about 20 hours to encrypt the drive, with available speeds of 1300 read and write during encryption.
With FileVault off, we saw 2000 MB/s write and 2700 read for the 512GB model.
After FileVault encryption completed, read speeds dropped down to 2150MB/s.
2018 MacBook Pro storage speed is completely unaffected by FileVault. (1150 write speed and 2500 read speed on 256GB SSD) -
Here are over 150 new features and changes in iOS 12 for iPhone and iPad
SoCalZman said:- Leveler removed from Compass app
-
Review: The 2018 i7 15-inch MacBook Pro is much more than a spec bump
bkkcanuck said:It would be interesting to note if there is much of a real world difference between the 2.2 and 2.6 model one since there really is only a $100 difference between similarly optioned models. ($300 between 2.6 and i9).From our testing: 4 run average of Cinebench R15 CPU test back-to-back:Base: 991
Mid: 1001
i9: 1011
Clock speed averages for each under load after heating up and stabilizing:
Base: 3.05Ghz
Mid: 3.1Ghz
i9: 3.15Ghz
-
Blind comparison of photography on the iPhone XR versus Google Pixel 3 XL
MacMan1993 said:How come all the photos, except the one with the guy and his dark jacket, are all three feet nearer when taken with the Google phone? Hardly a fair like-for-like comparision, the shots are different. All the images looked good, some better than others. 50-50 with me, but it's great that we have such tech in small packages.
The good: Background compression looks really nice since it forces you to stand further back.
The bad: You can't take wide portrait photos. -
Tested: Thermal conditions in the 2018 i9 MacBook Pro dramatically hampering performance
bayridge8829 said:Is the i7 throttled as well? How does i7 performance compare to the spec? How does i7 throttled compare to i9 throttled?
The i7 (advertised at 2.2GHz base & 4.1GHz Turbo Boost) stayed at around 2.3 - 2.6GHz average clock speed during back-to-back CPU tests in Cinebench R15.
Reached a peak of 3.8GHz when the test started.The i9 (advertised at 2.9GHz base & 4.8GHz Turbo Boost) was at around 2.4 - 2.8GHz average clock speed.
Reached a peak of 4.2GHz when the test started. -
Amazon Echo recorded household audio, sent it to random contact [u]
-
Comparing the Dell XPS 13 9370 versus Apple's 2018 13-inch MacBook Pro with Touch Bar
tjwolf said:You mention the XPS has double the SSD storage - but you didn’t give any information about their relative performances. Not all SSDs are created equal. Personal example: started a new job last year and they gave me a super powerful Lenovo Windows desktop w. 64gb RAM and a 1TB SSD. A complete build of our application - very IO intensive activity - took 15 seconds. Very fast compared to my colleague’s hard disk based times (30+ seconds). When I needed to replace it with a laptop, I got a 2017 15” MBP with 16gb RAM and a 512gb SSD. It builds the same application in 7 seconds flat. Because the SSDs in Macs are the fastest on the planet.
-
Watch: iPhone X vs. Galaxy S9+ cameras compared
-
2018 iPad Pro: everything you need to know
Shane_H said:"This means users can connect an external 5K display, extra storage or even charge their iPhone with a USB-C to Lightning cable." Define extra storage? I cannot find anything about that on Apples Site. Looks like it can see the same external devices as before, Like cameras, keyboards and such. USB-C Hard drives and Flash drives are not mentioned.
Not sure who added the external storage bit. -
Samsung debuts iPhone X-challenging Galaxy Note 9 with upgraded S Pen, full-day battery & ...