chutzpah
About
- Banned
- Username
- chutzpah
- Joined
- Visits
- 14
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 1,296
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 392
Reactions
-
All the Apple subreddits set to go dark in protest of Reddit's API charges
ChrisSalvatore2003 said:Isn't that convenient that Apple takes their reddit tags away with their 30% fees they charge. For shame, for shame. -
Apple Vision Pro headset will get its own App Store featuring apps for visionOS
-
Apple making the case that Apple Silicon Mac & iPhone are great gaming machines
-
Apple Vision Pro $3,499 mixed-reality headset launches at WWDC after years of rumors
9secondkox2 said:Xed said:twolf2919 said:I watched the introduction and couldn't help but laugh when I saw this thing: like a mix of ski and scuba goggles - bonus: the "see through" eyes that seem slightly larger than real-life LOL. Then I noticed the tether that every shot tried so desperately to hide - in hair, scarfs...anything. By the time I saw the price I already knew this was DOA - the $3500 was just the flowers on the grave.
Don't get me wrong: from a technical perspective, Apple did an amazing job. But this product is done in by its form factor - nobody wants to be even more isolated than they already are by wearing dorky goggles, tethered to some batteries in your pocket no less - and by the lack of a killer app. You heard the word "replace" a lot during the presentation - it can "replace" a large screen TV (not mentioned, of course, is that it can only do so when you're alone)...it can replace multiple monitors so you can work with more of your apps (of course, interacting with those apps is a lot more clumsy than with a physical keyboard and mouse/touchpad)....I kept looking for the metaphor that best fits this product as presented - "jumped the shark" came to mind. Apple just threw everything it had at the board and hoped that something will stick to make this product succeed. But I really don't see a standout feature I'd pay $3500 for. Heck - I don't see a standout feature I'd pay $1000 for. Now - if this had been presented in a nice pair of stylish AR glasses without an insane tether to an external battery, I might have been convinced....wait another 3-5 years, I guess.
All 8 photos of it being worn on their main page shows a cable very clearly.
https://www.apple.com/apple-vision-pro/ -
Apple Vision Pro $3,499 mixed-reality headset launches at WWDC after years of rumors
9secondkox2 said:
Then I saw they’re using Unity as their 3D base. So it will only be Apple Arcade games. -
Hands on with visionOS -- using the Apple Vision Pro operating system
darkvader said:You know, this thing could actually be useful (if it runs Mac apps) or completely useless and stupid (if it doesn't).I wonder which one will happen?
And there's plenty of scope for it to be useful without running Mac apps. Silly trolling. -
Mac Pro M2 review - Maybe a true modular Mac will come in a few more years
nubus said:With Intel shipping PCI Gen 5 (double bandwidth), latest Xeon delivering +2x multicore performance, no GPU-support, the removal of ECC memory, and no way of upgrading... are we looking at the last in a series that started with Mac II?
Should Cook have axed it like Jobs discontinued Newton, servers, and printers? Why didn't he? They have been doing their best not to upgrade the Mac Pro for more than a decade. With all the benefits of Apple Silicon then be honest about "we're no longer in the modular workstation market". -
Giant 30-inch iMac, iPhone 15, OLED iPads: Apple's roadmap for 2023-2024
-
Spotify cutting off remaining customers paying through the App Store
-
Apple Car is a matter of 'when, not if' claims analyst
jeffharris said:Does the world REALLY need another car? Apple or otherwise.
What the world needs and what the world gets are seldom the same.