KalMadda

sounds like they actually did have these features most of the way completed, but ran into issues later in the process, and so now have to spend time repairing and reworking elements.  And the ads they ran were very clear that those features weren’t available yet.  Sometimes things come up and happen, I’d rather they spend the time to fix whatever issues they ran into with it then them rushing it out for release…

"If these features exist in any sort of working state at all, no one outside Apple has vouched for their existence, let alone for their quality....
 Why did Apple show these personalized Siri features at WWDC last year, and promise their arrival during the first year of Apple Intelligence? Why, for that matter, do they now claim to “anticipate rolling them out in the coming year” if they still currently do not exist in demonstratable form? And now they look so out of their depth, so in over their heads, that not only are they years behind the state-of-the-art in AI, but they don’t even know what they can ship or when.

Their headline features from nine months ago not only haven’t shipped but still haven’t even been demonstrated, which I, for one, now presume means they can’t be demonstrated because they don’t work."

behind and slipping even further by the month. It’s so strange since it began with a large lead.  This doesn’t bode well for Apple software development.  

I want Robbie the robot AI? Sure, it’s behind the competition not, one test I would like to see in the future on mobile and on desktop systems is what happens when you turn off the internet connection and then test the so-called AI capabilities of the systems Apple is in competition with? Apple software/hardware development certainly is easily better than the competition.

Why because Apple controls the OS and the hardware Microsoft is missing in action in mobile tablets, watches and headgear and even has third parties in the kernel to boot, Samsung has no In-house OS, and no in-house SOC in their mobile devices in the USA (their flagship phones SOC (made by Qualcomm which are barely ahead of the Apple 12 series which is 5 years old), Googles flagship phone has an SOC that’s six years behind Apple (which is just behind the 11 series Pro iPhone, and no desktop or tablet OS or computers worth talking about, but it’s Apple that’s doomed and behind sure….

https://browser.geekbench.com/mobile-benchmarks  Apple is years ahead and just about every area, SOC/tablet/desktop/watch and even further ahead in SOC hardware/ OS software integration, across mobile/desktop/headgear/watches. The competition has released bits and pieces of Me-too gear combined with even worse software integration thru the years.