jurassic

About

Username
jurassic
Joined
Visits
23
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
183
Badges
0
Posts
93
  • Here are the five biggest iPad Pro problems, because no device is perfect

    Actually, you can use external drives with iPads (even older iPads). Instead of connecting your drives by USB-C cable, you can connecting them wirelessly! I have a 1TB Seagate drive that has a battery and Wi_Fi built into it. I've been using it for years with my iPads and iPhones. And there are relatively inexpensive flash drives that you can buy, that also have an internal battery and Wi-Fi.

    The cool thing about using external drives wirelessly is that the drive can stay in your pocket, or on a table across the room, while you access files on it with your iPad.

    But, you don't need to buy a new wireless hard drive or flash drive if you already have external portable drives. You can buy a Kwilt (or another similar portable wireless server) and connect your drives to it. Then you can access the files on those drives either locally, or remotely access files on drives connected to your Kwilt and at home while you are away.

    mac_128StrangeDaysn2itivguytbornotpscooter63crossladgilly33bb-15watto_cobraapres587
  • Personality model casts Apple CEO Tim Cook as 'Advisor,' emphasizing values

    "Among famous Doers are... current U.S. President Donald Trump."

    Donald Trump: "I am a doer of very biggly things, using my stable genius brain, which happens to be the most genius brain in the world... and there is no collusion!"

    macky the mackystourquewatto_cobrachristopher126propodSpamSandwichGeorgeBMacjony0lolliver
  • Apple's first HomePod ads urge customers to 'order now'

    seankill said:
    Siri really isn’t that useful. 

    You may not have used Siri recently (or at all), but that opinion that Siri isn't useful, or in the same league as other AI assistants has been proven to be false.

    In December 2017 LoopVentures tested the various AI assistants with the same 800 questions divided into five categories.

    Test Results:

    • Understood Query:
    • Apple Siri: 99.0%
    • Amazon Echo: 97.9%
    • Google Home: 99.9%
    • MS Cortana: 98.9%

    • Answered Correctly:
    • Apple Siri: 75.4%
    • Amazon Echo: 63.8%
    • Google Home: 81.1%
    • MS Cortana: 56.4%

    Siri is currently only slightly behind Google Home, but well ahead of both Amazon Echo and MS Cortana. And Siri's ratings have been consistently improving.

    xzudewmerandominternetperson
  • Mac desktop shootout -- $3500 iMac 5K versus $1700 Mac mini

    "That's almost half the price the iMac and would leave you $1,600 for a monitor —except that you lose $400 of that if you add flash storage to the Mac mini that's comparable with the iMac's." "The 5K display is detailed and color-accurate, using the same exact panel that comes in LG's UltraFine 5K display. Bought separately, that display retails for $1,300. " "The iMac also comes with Apple's Magic Mouse 2 and Magic Keyboard in the box, so you don't have to worry about buying peripherals." ($178) "you can easily hook up an eGPU with the same Radeon 580 graphics card that comes in the top-spec iMac 5K for around than $500 total."

    So to bring the Mac mini up to the same features and specs as the iMac 5K it would cost $4,078 TOTAL ($1700 + $400 + $1300 + $178 + $500)! Buying the iMac 5K in this example would save you almost $800 compared to a similarly configured Mac mini!

    chasmfastasleepbaconstangcurtis hannahmike54lorin schultzGeorgeBMacwatto_cobra
  • Consumer Reports' dismissal of HomePod a familiar tale to Apple fans [u]

    If you want to get a good understanding of HOW Consumer Reports came out with such a negative assessment of the HomePod, in contradiction to the almost unanimous superlative reviews and testing results done by audio engineers and technology professionals, read this excerpt from CR's "review":

    "Consumer Reports evaluates sound quality for speakers, smart or otherwise, in a dedicated listening room in which our experienced testers compare each model with high-quality reference speakers. Each test unit that allows for user controls is tuned for optimum sound quality—we want the speakers to sound their best."

    Also, take a look at the photo of CR's testing "rig”. It has all speakers crammed together on a multi-shelf stand with many speakers in front of, behind, above, and below each other. It is a very cumbersome setup, in a very unnatural test environment (unlike ANY room and speaker placement that a real person would ever experience).

    In the photo of the Consumer Reports speaker setup in the listening room, notice that the HomePod speaker has no space or flat wall surfaces on the left and right sides, and on the back. The HomePod uses that free space around it, and the rear and side walls to reflect the left and right channels, using audio beamforming, while the center channel (audio that is centered in the sound space) is beamed forward.

    The HomePod is unlike other speakers that just have their internal speakers facing forward, and that DO NOT rely on reflected audio beamforming.

    In Consumer Report's setup, instead of clear, reflected left and right audio channels, the sound would have been muffled. It is unknown whether this debilitating positioning of the HomePod was done purposely, or if it was done due to a lack of understanding by the CR testers.

    In other words, it was a very poorly setup test environment, and the review consisted of "listeners" giving their own subjective feelings about which speaker they liked best. Aside from any unstated motives or biases of the "listeners" at Consumer Reports, there was no methodical or scientific testing done of the speakers, in various "natural" room environments. In contrast, this type of analytical and realistic testing WAS done by other reputable audio engineers and technology professionals.

    DAalsethpscooter63randominternetperson
  • Morgan Stanley sees Apple's video business rivaling Netflix by 2025, ups target to $245

    nunzy said:
    These analysts are ALWAYS wrong!

    If, as you say, analysts are always wrong... Then everybody would be billionaires by just doing the opposite of what any analyst recommends.

    But in reality saying "analysts are ALWAYS wrong!" is an untruth. The fact is that some analysts have better records of providing accurate analysis than others. Analysts prognosticate based on available data, and in general, they are neither right all of the time nor are they wrong all of the time.

    nunzywatto_cobra
  • Researcher demos new macOS Keychain exploit, holds data from Apple in protest

    "1) the person trying to steal your passwords has to first have access to your Mac."

    So don't give your Mac to the hacker... Problem solved! ;-))

    jdgazjbdragonmagman1979watto_cobra
  • Foxconn may transfer Chinese engineers to Wisconsin LCD plant due to difficult labor marke...

    "Foxconn may transfer Chinese engineers to Wisconsin"

    But... Doesn't that go against the Orange Clown's efforts to stop immigrants from "invading" the USA, and to MAWA... er, I mean MAGA?

    badmonkP-DogNCfallenjt
  • Full-screen Touch ID could come to the iPhone with acoustic fingerprint imaging

    "Face ID still has some flaws that Touch ID continues to be better at, such as unlocking the iPhone without looking at it , or with it still stored in the user's pocket."

    That doesn't make Touch ID "better". Reaching into your pocket for something else, or to adjust the position of the phone in your pocket, and accidentally "unlocking the iPhone without looking at it", only wastes battery by turning on the screen while the iPhone is in your pocket (without you being aware of it).

    And in general, "unlocking the iPhone without looking at it", even if the iPhone isn't in your pocket, doesn't make much sense. People need to look at their iPhones when they use them (if you can't see the screen it's impossible to use any apps).

    spheric80s_Apple_Guy
  • iPhone X beats out Galaxy S10+ CPU in alleged benchmark testing

    This will be Samsung’s “fastest” 2019 phone when it is eventually released for sale, but Apple’s 2017 iPhone X beats it. Apple’s 2018 iPhones with A12 are even faster than that. And when Apple’s much faster 2019 iPhones are introduced in June, with the upcoming A13 SOC, its benchmarks will put Samsung’s “fastest” 2019 phone to even greater ridicule.
    watto_cobra